Posted on 09/19/2011 9:15:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Hey Zero, what makes you think your scam will even see the light of day.
Can’t wait until America vetoes him out of OUR House next year or sooner.
Barack, sit down, shut up and eat your peas. The Tea Party is about to force-feed them to you.
What as the the Stupid Party’s response been? It should be laughter.
Beyond Dumb
STUPID, STUPIDER and STUPIDEST! This is the progressive liberal thought process. It can get worse, worser and worsest.
Sorry to pervert the English language but how else to describe it, escapes me at this moment.
FUBO
Let me be the first here to say this: There is no affirmative action program for the Presidency of the United States. You pass or you fail.
Higher Taxes Won’t Reduce the Deficit
History shows that when Congress gets more revenue, the pols spend it.
In the late 1980s, one of us, Richard Vedder, and Lowell Gallaway of Ohio University co-authored a often-cited research paper for the congressional Joint Economic Committee (known as the $1.58 study) that found that every new dollar of new taxes led to more than one dollar of new spending by Congress. Subsequent revisions of the study over the next decade found similar results.
But no matter how we configured the data and no matter what variables we examined, higher tax collections never resulted in less spending.
The grand bargain so many in Washington yearn fortax increases coupled with spending cutsis a fool’s errand. Our research confirms what the late economist Milton Friedman said of Congress many years ago: “Politicians will always spend every penny of tax raised and whatever else they can get away with.”
The countdown continues...
And how exactly does it do that? How many 'most vulnerable' are there that we need to spend $3.4 TRILLION dollars this year?
$3.4Trillion, divided by 300 million (population of the USA) equals over $11,000 per person.
Don’t forget - Pelosi’s PAYGO program is still in affect.
OweBama is determined to be a one-term president.
Hey Barry, it isn’t the raising of taxes that will do you in or help your *cause*, it is the resulting economic collapse that will sink your sorry excuse for a leader.
Go ahead and put all your eggs in that basket, because it is the final nail in the coffin that is your reelection chances.
Does this mean Obama will VETO the "jobs bill" if it does not tax the job creators?
I'm going out and get the popcorn.
I have a nightmare that when we do get rid of this pile of horse dung, that the Media that loves him will keep barfing him up on us every couple of days like they do with Bubba the Clinton.
Not that many months left until we get to veto that idiot.
Then he can go back to his peers in Chicago - land of sleaze.
OK How about this. We’ll put a 50% property tax on hollywood mansions and leave everyone else alone.
I suppose he could sign an executive order to remain in control after jan 20th 2013 once the violence he and his ilk are inciting starts up in our cities. You know, in the name of national security.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.