Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iím for the Rich: A wealthy person gave me my first job. And Iíll bet the same is true of you.
National Review ^ | 09/19/2011 | Mona Charen

Posted on 09/20/2011 7:46:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

President Obama and the Democrats are finally happy. Liberated from thoughts of compromise with Republicans, they can fully indulge their most lascivious pleasure — trashing rich people. “We simply cannot afford these special lower rates for the wealthy,” President Obama declared in his Rose Garden message Monday.

“Give ’Em Hell, Barry” cheered Hendrik Hertzberg of The New Yorker. Hertzberg was chipper. Not so Paul Krugman of the New York Times, the Democratic party’s choleric scold: “The rage of the rich has been building ever since Mr. Obama took office,” he glowered. “And among the undeniably rich, a belligerent sense of entitlement has taken hold: it’s their money, and they have the right to keep it.” Imagine.

The president, brimming with indignation, asserts that “hedge-fund managers” are paying taxes at a lower rate than “teachers and firefighters.” “How can you defend that?” he demands.

You don’t have to defend that, because it isn’t true. This synthetic outrage about the taxes paid by the super-rich — the so-called Buffett Rule — is the greatest waste of political time and energy in recent memory.

As Stephen Moore, an economics writer for the Wall Street Journal, has observed, we cannot know with certainty what Warren Buffett paid in taxes (and he is certainly free to write a larger check to the IRS). But “according to the Congressional Budget Office, middle-class families in 2007 (earning between $34,000 and $50,000) paid an effective 14.3% of their income in all federal taxes. The top 5% of income earners paid 27.9% and the top 1% paid 29.5%. And what about the highest earners? Americans with annual incomes above $2 million paid an average 32% of their income in federal taxes in 2005 (the most recent year for which data are available).”

In 2008, Charlie Gibson questioned Barack Obama about his desire to raise the capital-gains tax. Gibson reminded candidate Obama that presidents Clinton and Bush had reduced the capital-gains tax rate. “And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down. So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?”

“Well, Charlie,” Mr. Obama replied, “What I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital-gains tax for purposes of fairness.”

So it isn’t a matter of raising revenue — and by most estimates, the amount raised by a millionaires surtax would be trifling compared with the size of the national debt — it’s a matter of sticking it to those guys with the “belligerent sense of entitlement” to their own property.

Well, I’m for the rich, and not just because the top 1 percent of earners in America paid 38 percent of income taxes in 2008. And not just because I suspect that attempting to tax the rich more will only lead to more tax avoidance, not more tax revenues for the federal government. I’m for the rich because, with some exceptions, they’ve earned their money. A Prince and Associates study found that only 10 percent of multi-millionaires had inherited their wealth.

In the process of earning their wealth, the rich have created products, services, and whole industries that have dramatically improved my work life, my family life, and my health. I’m so grateful to them for the GPS, iPads, non-drowsy antihistamines, smartphones, XM radio, and The Teaching Company courses — to name only a few advances of the past decade or two.

I’m for the rich because nearly all of the rich people I’ve met are extremely public-spirited. They volunteer. They form committees to improve things in their communities. And they are incredibly generous with their money. As Arthur C. Brooks of the American Enterprise Institute notes, “The top 10 percent of households in income are responsible for at least a quarter of all the money contributed to charity, and households with total wealth exceeding $1 million give about half of all charitable donations.” In general, I think they probably make wiser choices in their charitable giving than the federal government would make if it took their money and spent it.

I’m for the rich because they create the dynamism and energy of a growing economy. The rich create businesses and hire people.

A wealthy person gave me my first job. And I’ll bet the same is true of you.

I’m for the rich and for all the people who simply want an opportunity to become rich — opportunities that are becoming scarcer with every passing day of Mr. Obama’s presidency.

— Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rich; taxes; wealthy

1 posted on 09/20/2011 7:46:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My first job was with a nonprofit, but I think I am part of a very small minority there.

One of the things I learned was that I did not want to ever work for a nonprofit company again.


2 posted on 09/20/2011 7:48:56 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Liberals always get their jobs from poor people. After all, liberals would never work for evil people like the rich.


3 posted on 09/20/2011 7:49:45 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (California: Making Texas more Conservative one voter at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Many years ago, someone told me...Give a poor man a dollar and he spend it. Give a rich man a dollar and he’ll turn it into two.


4 posted on 09/20/2011 7:50:12 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Too bad Barry got rich by Running for President and writing a couple of books.....And will get richer after his Presidency(I’m guessing at least 1 more book and lots of money for giving speeches!)


5 posted on 09/20/2011 7:50:37 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

RE: My first job was with a nonprofit

Your nonprofit receives its money from many people who have the money to donate. Many of them are rich. So, indirectly you got from first job from the generosity of the rich as well.


6 posted on 09/20/2011 7:51:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When’s the last time anyone got a job from a homeless person?


7 posted on 09/20/2011 7:52:01 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Obama's presidency is shovel-ready; let's bury it in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have never worked for a poor person. Even when I was in the Navy.....if I’m not mistaken, the owner of the Navy is very rich.


8 posted on 09/20/2011 7:52:43 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

The greedy poor like to sponge off the rich and not so rich.


9 posted on 09/20/2011 7:57:38 AM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I work for the ultimate capitalist enterprise - a small start up company where we all own a chunk of the company (the VCs own most of it). We all hope to make some money on it someday. I’m amazed at the ultra liberals in our enterprise — those who love taxing the rich and punishing success. I just don’t know how they survive the cognitive dissonance. My brain would disolve into quivering mush if I had to simultaneously believe in two such diametrically opposed ideas.


10 posted on 09/20/2011 7:59:58 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I know rich people, middle class people, and poor people. Of the 3 groups, the rich people are the ones that are willing and able to create jobs.

And most of my jobs have involved working for rich folks (rich by oBama’s definition).


11 posted on 09/20/2011 8:06:33 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
I just don’t know how they survive the cognitive dissonance.

They are looking forward to getting rich so they can pay huge taxes and support our great nation. [/sarc]

12 posted on 09/20/2011 8:08:07 AM PDT by tpmintx (The people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
My brain would disolve into quivering mush if I had to simultaneously believe in two such diametrically opposed ideas.

You need to work on your "doublethink", this is a necessary survival skill in the post 1984 era.

Regards,
GtG

13 posted on 09/20/2011 8:20:51 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
back in 1960 a very wealthy gave my mom and dad a job taking care of their property and mom prepared their meals, she was not a chef but a good country cook..
what a wonderful life they had for many years, after my dad's sudden death at 63 mom continued working for them until 75yrs.old...I will love and value that family FOREVER...

and yes I worked for many wealthy before I worked for my self..
if not for the wealthy where would this country be??? obama needs to loose it all and try starting all over..he would be lost and he will be lost when he leaves office on Jan. 20, 2013...
OH HAPPY DAY THAT WILL BE

14 posted on 09/20/2011 8:26:28 AM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The premises behind a ‘non-profit’ are intellecutally dishonbest and morally bankrupt.

Also - I’ve never been hired by a poor individual.

Where do these morons think wealth comes from?


15 posted on 09/20/2011 8:33:18 AM PDT by Noumenon (The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: haircutter
and I should mention that family continued caring (financially) for my mom until her death at 85.
16 posted on 09/20/2011 8:33:19 AM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Those with wealth are important engines within an economy since they are able to invest, sponser, expand and start new enterprises.

What I loathe is the attitude of hating the rich because they are rich.

I believe this comes from two primary feelings:

The first of these is driven by the idea that wealth is limited and so for someone to be rich, they must have made others poor.

The second I think is just simple jealously. Individuals look at the possessions of another and, unable to buy their own, want to tear that person down.


17 posted on 09/20/2011 8:43:56 AM PDT by Byzantine Basileus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

They work for the poor people, or so they say. They most likely have a job because of a rich businessman providing the opportunity for them. They will never say they are rich, because they despise the rich. If for some reason they do either make or come into some money, they FEEL guilty. They want the rich people (even though most of them are conservatives) to feel guilty as well. My Dad always said the quickest way to turn a liberal into a conservative is to let them have a little money. It’s easy to spend other people’s money, but it’s a lot harder if the money being spent is your own.


18 posted on 09/20/2011 8:49:15 AM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Not so Paul Krugman of the New York Times, the Democratic party’s choleric scold: “The rage of the rich has been building ever since Mr. Obama took office,” he glowered.

"Rage of the rich"? Really?!

The only raging I've heard is from the parasite class and the Øbongobots. They are fiscal crack-whores looking for another fix and completely indifferent to who they damage in their craven pursuit.

19 posted on 09/20/2011 8:51:36 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
One of the things I learned was that I did not want to ever work for a nonprofit company again.

If you don't make a profit, you're doing it wrong.

20 posted on 09/20/2011 9:00:49 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My first job was waitressing at a small cafe that held less than 40 customers so it was just me, the cook and the occasional dishwasher. The owner was definitely not rich though should have been since he never turned in our social security withholdings.


21 posted on 09/20/2011 9:10:45 AM PDT by bgill (There, happy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Many years ago, someone told me...Give a poor man a dollar and he spend it. Give a rich man a dollar and he’ll turn it into two.

And many many years ago a man we all should know had this to say:

Matthew 25:14-30

14 “Again, it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted his wealth to them. 15 To one he gave five bags of gold, to another two bags, and to another one bag,[a] each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The man who had received five bags of gold went at once and put his money to work and gained five bags more. 17 So also, the one with two bags of gold gained two more. 18 But the man who had received one bag went off, dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.

   19 “After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them. 20 The man who had received five bags of gold brought the other five. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with five bags of gold. See, I have gained five more.’

   21 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’

   22 “The man with two bags of gold also came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with two bags of gold; see, I have gained two more.’

   23 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’

   24 “Then the man who had received one bag of gold came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘I knew that you are a hard man, harvesting where you have not sown and gathering where you have not scattered seed. 25 So I was afraid and went out and hid your gold in the ground. See, here is what belongs to you.’

   26 “His master replied, ‘You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? 27 Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest.

   28 “‘So take the bag of gold from him and give it to the one who has ten bags. 29 For whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 30 And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

22 posted on 09/20/2011 9:38:41 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
They just want to be invited to the right parties!
Think of the party scene in Atlas Shrugged where Dagny meets Reardon’s wife.
23 posted on 09/20/2011 9:45:22 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m all for rich people, too...but billionaires no longer. Tax ‘em all 100% to help them remember that communism is not all it’s cracked up to be.


24 posted on 09/20/2011 10:45:33 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This article contains good, in-your-face rhetoric that is needed to counter the socialist pseudo-fairness argument.


25 posted on 09/20/2011 1:56:56 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (Socon-Econ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson