I have read the entire Federal Convention debate and the philosophers favored by the authors.
and you cannot pick and choose which parts of the Constitution should and should not be followed nor can you decide which people will and will not be protected by the Constitution.
This has NOTHING to do with picking and choosing which parts we should or should not follow. Islam is incompatible with the social contract simply because its adherents believe their claims SUPERSEDE the Constitution in its entirety.
Got it? I didn't pick and choose, Muslims did. They are not Americans regardless of the twisted fantasy that has conferred them the legal status of "citizenship" with they gladly use to dismember that very Constitution. They are not deserving of its protections because they have stated, in writing, that they seek to destroy them.
Glad to clear things up for you.
“They are not Americans regardless of the twisted fantasy that has conferred them the legal status of “citizenship” with they gladly use to dismember that very Constitution. They are not deserving of its protections...”
Could you please cite a SCOTUS case where it was ruled that Muslims cannot be American citizens and are also not protected by the Constitution?