Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Bridge to Nowhere
National Review ^ | 9/21/2011 | Andrew Stiles

Posted on 09/21/2011 5:23:39 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross

The president promotes his jobs bill with a project that is not shovel-ready.

In an effort to highlight the need for the American Jobs Act, which would provide billions in new infrastructure funding, the president will deliver a speech within sight of a “functionally obsolete” bridge on the Ohio River.

Though the president disavowed “political grandstanding” in an address to Congress earlier this month, even the communications staff at the White House could not deny the political motives behind the visit. “This was on a long list, but it was notable because it connects . . . Ohio and Kentucky,” White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer told the Cincinnati Enquirer on Tuesday, referring to the home states of House speaker John Boehner (R.) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R.) respectively. “It says a lot that the bridge that would connect the states of two such powerful leaders would be considered functionally obsolete.”

But in this case, even the president’s political grandstanding isn’t very well thought out.

The bridge in question is the Brent Spence Bridge, a 48-year-old structure spanning the Ohio River. It lies on a critical commercial route, carrying an average of 172,000 vehicles each day, more than double the number it was designed to carry.

In his address to Congress earlier this month, President Obama singled out the bridge as example of one that “needs repair.” White House press secretary Jay Carney echoed this line last week. “It’s pretty clear that this bridge could benefit from a little repair and renovation,” he told reporters. But local authorities are already on the case. They have been working for nearly a decade on a plan to replace the bridge with an entirely new structure, part of a broader initiative to alleviate vehicle congestion in the area.

Pfeiffer told the Enquirer that passing the president’s jobs bill would put unemployed construction workers to work right away on infrastructure projects across Ohio and Kentucky. The term “shovel-ready” comes to mind. However, there is nothing “shovel-ready” about the Brent Spence Bridge. Analysis on the project began only recently, and the Federal Highway Administration has yet to open the issue to public comment. Even if all the necessary funding were in place (which it’s not), the FHWA estimates, the earliest possible start date for construction on the project would be 2015, with a completion date in 2022.

Part of the reason is that various noise and environmental studies are still being conducted to ensure that the project is in compliance with state and federal regulations. According to a 2004 agreement between Ohio and Kentucky, the “environmental phase” of the Brent Spence Bridge project was estimated to cost $18 million.

As for the funding, the project carries a price tag of $2.4 billion. Under a typical arrangement, the federal government provides 80 percent of the funding, with state and local governments pitching in the rest. In this case, the feds would provide $1.9 billion, with state and local governments on the hook for $500 million. So far, only about $90 million of the state and local share has been allocated. And again, even if all that funding were to be released tomorrow, actual construction wouldn’t begin for at least another four years.

President Obama himself admitted that one of the flaws of the stimulus package was the fact that “shovel-ready wasn’t as shovel-ready as we expected.” And yet here he is touting efforts like the Brent Spence Bridge replacement as an example of an infrastructure project that could “put people to work right now” and get the economy growing again. Can Obama really blame members of Congress, including a number of Democrats, for being a bit skeptical this time around?

The first stimulus plan included $51.9 billion for “transportation” and “infrastructure” programs. Of that tidy sum, the Brent Spence Bridge received exactly $0, despite having already been declared “functionally obsolete.” Given the president’s professed concern for the bridge’s health, surely this omission was an egregious oversight.

There is no “Brent Spence Bridge Clause” in the American Jobs Act, so despite what the White House would have the citizens of Ohio and Kentucky believe, passing the president’s bill would not guarantee federal funding for the project, much less speed up the construction timeline. Either way, because the project won’t be ready to break ground for another several years, it would be a rather ill-advised investment to make in the name of economic “stimulus.”

“The only thing that can stop [the American Jobs Act from passing] is politics and our hope is that everyone is willing to put country before party to get something done,” Pfeiffer said. That the president would ignore his own advice and embrace political grandstanding should come as no surprise. But who knew he’d be so inept at it?

TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bridge; n0bama; zero
Hey Zero. It doesn't matter anyhow. We're not for sale.

And in the greatest of ironies, n0bama is gonna shut down this very bridge for hours due to his inept grandstanding!

1 posted on 09/21/2011 5:23:43 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Yeah but the bridge connects the 56th and 57th state! Isn't that important?

Think he'll put that bedpan on his head, get on his girly bike, and peddle across it???????????

2 posted on 09/21/2011 5:27:02 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
If he did not fix it last time, why would I believe that he wants to truely fix it this time? Why was it not important to fix last time? And since he did not fix it last time, where did the money go to fix it? Or did the bridge get too small in a just a couple of years?

I was wondering, how many bridges can you fix for one Solar Company Payola?

"The first stimulus plan included $51.9 billion for “transportation” and “infrastructure” programs."

Oh, I see, TEN National Stimilus packages fit in ONE doners loan package.

Obviously if they want a new bridge, all they need to do is donate $10k to Obamas re-election. Obviously all the bridges in the United States are not as important as one doner when it comes to "stimilus".

I thought bribes and missdirection of public funds was illegal. Silly me, that must only when the sum is less than a million. Shucks, there are people in prison right now for longer than Obamas term limits for stealing less than .0001% of what that solar deal cost the taxpayers.

Grand theft is $10,000. I tried to calculate what percentage of grand theft that deal was, but had to do it long hand, my calculator does not GO THAT HIGH! That is 500,000 Grand theft charges in one deal. Amazing...

Just think, if Obama had to spend ONE day in prison for every charge of Grand Theft this generates, he would be in prison for ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND SIXTY NINE YEARS. Sometimes, with Obama, I really struggle to get a grasp on just how EVIL his schemes are.

3 posted on 09/21/2011 5:51:33 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Oh, I see, TEN National Stimilus packages fit in ONE doners loan package.

I think you are confusing you millions and your billions.

And the sad part is, on this solar scam thing, you are far from the only one. Only off by a thousand times or so, but $530 billion somehow seems like a figure that a solar panel maker would borrow; something like $1,500.00 from every man woman and child in America, rather than $1.00.

Just shows how desensitized people are becoming to the magnitude of borrowing and spending going on.

4 posted on 09/21/2011 6:46:24 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson