Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut Governor Enacts Card Check Through Executive Order
Big Government ^ | 9/22/11 | Dr. Susan Berry

Posted on 09/22/2011 12:34:58 PM PDT by Nachum

Continuing a fiat governance style that is right out of the Obama playbook, Democratic and Working Families Party Governor Dannel Malloy issued two executive orders yesterday that will force daycare providers and home healthcare workers in Connecticut to join unions. The orders, his ninth and tenth since taking office in January, will force the state’s 4,000 daycare providers to add over $1 million in dues to union coffers, and remove the right to secret ballot election for these workers by instituting a card check process.

(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: card; check; connecticut; dannelmalloy; democratcorruption; democrats; governor; govtabuse; liberalfascism; liberals; malloy; tyranny; unioncorruption; unions
Obamanomics
1 posted on 09/22/2011 12:35:10 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

But hey this won’t hurt the two parent working family that is struggling as it is. What’s a few more bucks to the daycare. You can just cut out 5 large pizzas a month to cover it.//////


2 posted on 09/22/2011 12:40:19 PM PDT by lakeman (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Somewhere Ayn Rand is smiling............


3 posted on 09/22/2011 12:41:49 PM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
My guess is that the primary result of this action will be to drive many small in-home daycare providers and parents “under the table” where the parent and the provider work out a cash only payment arrangement so as to avoid all the union crap, not to mention the tax man.
4 posted on 09/22/2011 12:45:11 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What’s next? Force parents to utilize these Union providers?


5 posted on 09/22/2011 12:48:14 PM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I love his quote that he is for worker’s rights to organize. What a liar. If he really cared about worker’s “rights”, he would not force an open ballot.


6 posted on 09/22/2011 12:48:50 PM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: apillar
My guess is that the primary result of this action will be to drive many small in-home daycare providers and parents “under the table”

Which will drive the Ministerium für Staatssicherheit into high gear. They'll start raiding those types of places.

7 posted on 09/22/2011 12:51:05 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Deploy. Dominate. Disappear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Who’s gonna watch the babies when the daycare worker gets her union-ordered coffee and lunch breaks and goes into overtime t 8 Hours?

Were I a daycare provider, I’d go Galt before I’d send money to a union

Maybe start a petsitting busineess!


8 posted on 09/22/2011 12:52:27 PM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

We’re clearly entering an epoch where any pretense of the ‘rat party being separate from unions is completely blown. The ‘rat party, unions, big govt are all synonyms... along with “the enemy within that wants to suck the life out of the private sector”.


9 posted on 09/22/2011 12:53:20 PM PDT by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
What’s next? Force parents to utilize these Union providers?

Shhhhhh... don't give them ideas :(

10 posted on 09/22/2011 12:56:24 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

coming to MN soon courtesy Gov.Marx Dayton...


11 posted on 09/22/2011 12:58:00 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lakeman

nooooo, of course not. Nor will it hurt the single mother who prefers to work and actually make something of herself, rather than raise her child or children on welfare, and has all she can do to pay for childcare as it is. The state needs to make it even more difficult for these mothers to work!


12 posted on 09/22/2011 1:02:30 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: apillar

The state has already all but prohibited that, apillar. The increase in regulations for child care are astounding.


13 posted on 09/22/2011 1:04:53 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist

Open Ballot? Those who throw the letters out will find themselves in a union they didn’t even have a say in.

These people do not work for the same employer, I thought tiny businesses that employed a few people were exempt from unionization? Not any more I guess.

Liberals are simply insane.


14 posted on 09/22/2011 1:09:13 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Here's some background on the charlatan gangster in action:

Malloy faced Republican Tom Foley, the former United States Ambassador to Ireland under President George W. Bush, in the race for governor. In the last Quinnipiac University poll released on the morning before Election Day, Malloy trailed Foley 48% to 45%.[20]

According to The New York Times on November 3, Malloy was officially elected governor; they later placed Foley in the lead with no declared winner.[21] The Associated Press had at one point also placed Foley ahead by 8,424 votes because they hadn't added the votes from New Haven or Bridgeport at that time.[22] In the days following the election, there was controversy over several polling locations in Bridgeport remaining open until 10 p.m. on Election Day due to ballot shortages.[22] Foley's team looked into the events that took place in Bridgeport and determined that there was no fraud involved.[23]

15 posted on 09/22/2011 1:11:03 PM PDT by parisa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Let me guess cthe Democrat and Working Families Party should be renamed Democrap and SEIU Party.


16 posted on 09/22/2011 1:22:33 PM PDT by OrioleFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Hey, the voters in CT. had a choice last year and they chose to elect a commie for their governor. I’m sure many of those being affected by these orders voted for the dictator-wanna-be.


17 posted on 09/22/2011 1:26:08 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The “smart” people the dictator’s royal orders power.


18 posted on 09/22/2011 1:27:55 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The drooling libs that infest CT got what they voted for. Hope they stew in it.


19 posted on 09/22/2011 1:30:22 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Being the amoral thug she was, I am sure she is cackling...if they permit souls in hell to watch their socially corrupt handy work play out. I don't know that she knows.
20 posted on 09/22/2011 1:31:08 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Who’s gonna watch the babies when the daycare worker gets her union-ordered coffee and lunch breaks and goes into overtime t 8 Hours?


Service to self is all that matters. To hell with the babies.


21 posted on 09/22/2011 1:32:35 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

A lot of us in CT know Malloy stole the election. Fraud and the state labor unions got him Selected. It’s the inner cities and portions of Connecticut that should belong to New York that also doomed us.


22 posted on 09/22/2011 1:36:45 PM PDT by kneehurts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Not everyone chose to elect a commie.

But then, take note of my screen name.


23 posted on 09/22/2011 1:39:23 PM PDT by surroundedinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

More unions ,less business. CT is going down a greased hill.


24 posted on 09/22/2011 1:46:09 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ....Rats carry plague)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Lol. I can imagine the union rules for daycare!

Falling: call 911 to pick up baby; have two union reps present when baby is raised.

Choking: call 911 to perform heimlich (not covered in contract); have two union reps present when attempting to remove foreign object.

etc.


25 posted on 09/22/2011 1:53:10 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

The collapsing birth rate and thus long term extinction of our civilization make this additional pressure all the more dangerous.

Honestly at this point we might hope for a compete collapse rather then a slow death. Maybe more women will start focusing on children rather then economic prosperity in this life.

All I can say for sure is the one that do focus on having more kids instead of being more successful in this one life are the ones that will continue to exist(genetically) in the future.

We are breeding the so called “high achievers” out of existences.


26 posted on 09/22/2011 2:12:38 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

Is this Dayton person any relation to the family that started Dayton’s department stores?

I wonder how many of those employees were forced to be unionized???

Marxist bastards. All of them.


27 posted on 09/22/2011 2:19:16 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

same guy. (inherited his family’s money)

Daytons became Marshal Fields, I think.


28 posted on 09/22/2011 2:22:00 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

These people do not work for the same employer, I thought tiny businesses that employed a few people were exempt from unionization? Not any more I guess.””

Similar legislation is being pounded thru the Calif legislature.

Also a bill concerning BABYSITTING-—where your babysitter needs a ‘break for bathroom & rest” every 4 hours & a ‘substitute babysitter’ must be hired for that break. Also mandatory WORKMEN’S COMP for babysitters & METICULOUS records of payroll & paychecks.

Wait until they go after the teen age boys for lawn mowing.

Glad I left California when I did.


29 posted on 09/22/2011 2:22:08 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Looks like the libs are launching a "Yellow Sh!t Storm".


30 posted on 09/22/2011 3:25:09 PM PDT by capt. norm (Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves for they shall never run out of material. c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist
union protectionism isn't a 'right.' It's a violation of others' rights - to trade freely and without interference, intervention, or legal force.
31 posted on 09/22/2011 6:25:56 PM PDT by 4Liberty (88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan
SEIU Party. Very good. So MLK and Gandi like, peaceful transactors in a Civil Society, aren't they? [not]
32 posted on 09/22/2011 6:31:54 PM PDT by 4Liberty (88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

Democraps think the only working people are union members. Boy are they misinformed.


33 posted on 09/22/2011 7:36:58 PM PDT by OrioleFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Unions are the modern day plantations. Obama is the overseer.


34 posted on 09/22/2011 7:41:06 PM PDT by OrioleFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Obamanomics

Let's not dignify these abuses of power, even with a sarcastic label like above. THIS ... IS ... TYRANNY!

Useless to pretend we live and work under any sort of free enterprise system anymore. The time Benjamin Franklin presaged, when "... people discover they can vote themselves money" has definitely arrived. Now we have to push back a tidal wave of union corrupt/elitist investor-banker non-productive filty rich (ex. Soros, Buffet) laws and regulations. (Was that a run-on sentence???)

I'd rather we'd been hit by a giant tsunami than what has transpired in my lifetime.

BTW, just what kind of a party is the 'Working Families Party'? Hmmm, let me guess ... .. .. . . . . . . or let me gestapo!?!

35 posted on 09/22/2011 7:52:58 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Crony Capitalism & Unionboot-licking Marxist politicians are our undoing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; cableguymn; 4Liberty; apillar; bert; Bloody Sam Roberts; C210N; capt. norm; Catsrus; ...
How can any executive order apply to persons who are not employees of the executive branch?

I don't get it but I heard the commie governor of MN is considering doing something similar, but the signatures the union collected by subterfuge in MN are mostly wayyyyy too old. He might just conveniently ignore that and do the same as CT.
36 posted on 09/22/2011 8:31:11 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

Would there be a reason you are pinging me?


37 posted on 09/22/2011 8:36:19 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

That is a good question. I guess the answer is that Executive branch has been allowed to expand and expand their powers over the decades without any real challenge.


38 posted on 09/22/2011 8:36:46 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Just so everyone knows, Malloy won when a box of ballots was ‘found’ in Bridgeport (a solid Dem city), after a supposed election problem with ballots in Bridgeport, so polls were open an extra 2 hours in that city. It was a very close election.


39 posted on 09/22/2011 8:43:24 PM PDT by Betis70 (Bruins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The orders, his ninth and tenth since taking office in January, will force the state’s 4,000 daycare providers to add over $1 million in dues to union coffers,

I doubt it will do any such thing. It's a political stunt and the details can be found in this article.

40 posted on 09/22/2011 8:50:11 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater
How can any executive order apply to persons who are not employees of the executive branch?

Read the article cited in my post #40.

41 posted on 09/22/2011 8:51:52 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
Let's not dignify these abuses of power, even with a sarcastic label like above. THIS ... IS ... TYRANNY!

Sir, yes sir!

42 posted on 09/22/2011 9:52:45 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


43 posted on 09/22/2011 11:04:10 PM PDT by nutmeg (...just another terrorist, SOB tea-partyin' Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

“How can any executive order apply to persons who are not employees of the executive branch?

I don’t get it but I heard the commie governor of MN is considering doing something similar, but the signatures the union collected by subterfuge in MN are mostly wayyyyy too old. He might just conveniently ignore that and do the same as CT.”

Beyond lawlessness, you could have such a large mass of laws passed by the state that the executive order could simply be claiming to implement any part of the vast body of existing laws.

A body so vast as to authorize almost anything at the governors discretion.


44 posted on 09/23/2011 1:22:45 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

the ultimate answer to unlawful authority is civil disobedience

If formerly independent daycare providers and babysitters want to resist being forced to underwrite unions, and have any means of going Galt, time to plan for it


45 posted on 09/23/2011 5:37:40 AM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist

We all know that babysitters and elder care workers must be represented against evil and exploitive parents and relatives of the elderly, who would see them toil in sweat shop conditions

Babysitters of thr world unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!!

oh, wait....


46 posted on 09/23/2011 5:41:52 AM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

You are correct about Minnesota. Many of the signatures collected here are not only old but were collected with lies. No one knew that signing would be a request to unionize.


47 posted on 09/23/2011 6:13:30 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

The “smart” people - the international socialists who want to “rule” are thinking they are above the rule of law now. These people are treasonous.

They have good reason to think that. They very rarely are prosecuted or legally challenged with they break the law. If they do get nailed in a court, there is no big penality and treason is never mentioned. We need law that defines treason for this generation’s “ruler” wannabes and we need to prosecute it.


48 posted on 09/23/2011 7:59:16 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Democratic and Working Families Party Governor Dannel Malloy issued two executive orders yesterday that will force daycare providers and home healthcare workers in Connecticut to join unions.

So, what happens if they don't join? Do they go "private"?

49 posted on 09/24/2011 4:16:12 AM PDT by hattend (If I wanted you dead, you'd be dead. - Cameron Connor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson