Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worst Fox News-Google Debate Moment: Audience Boos a Gay Soldier
The Atlantic ^ | September 23, 2011 | Garance Franke-Ruta

Posted on 09/23/2011 12:19:04 AM PDT by lbryce

The last three GOP presidential primary debates have been nearly as notable for the actions of audience-members as for the candidates who appeared before them.

In California at the MSNBC-Politico debate at the Reagan library, the audience applauded mention of the high number of executions in Texas and Rick Perry's defense of the death penalty. "If you come into our state and you kill one of our children, you kill a police officer, you're involved with another crime and you kill one of our citizens, you will face the ultimate justice in the state of Texas, and that is that you will be executed," the Texas governor said to hoots, whistles, and applause.

In Tampa, Fla., at the CNN-Tea Party Express debate, the audience cheered the idea of letting an uninsured 30-year-old man die (video) without care, greeting the idea with applause and shouts of "Yeah!"

And last night, at the Fox News-Google debate in Orlando, Fla., some audience-members booed a recently-out gay soldier stationed in Iraq who submitted a question through Google's YouTube video-sharing site. His offense? Asking the candidates if they would circumvent the progress made for gays and lesbians in the military.

Watch the interaction with Stephen Hill:

"Any type of sexual activity has no place in the military," former senator Rick Santorum told Hill, saying that the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ban on out service constituted "special privileges" and "social experimentation."

The audience response led former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer to tweet, "Booing a soldier serving our nation is uncalled for. If I were on stage, I would make that point."

But he wasn't on the stage, and none standing there spoke up on Hill's behalf.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dadt; debates; doaskdotell; gay; gop; homonaziagenda; homonazisoldier; homopsychoagenda; homopsychosoldier; homosexualagenda; homosexualism; homotyranny; homotyrantsoldier; narcissism; republicanvalues; ricksantorum; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-166 next last
To: dagogo redux

You nailed it, that is exactly what it seems like.


51 posted on 09/23/2011 3:34:05 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Why don’t these “journalists” ask the people that supposedly Boo why they did... why are they blaming the GOP Audience? Oh, never mind..


52 posted on 09/23/2011 3:37:09 AM PDT by BallyBill (WARNING:Taking me serious could cause stress related illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Would that be ari the “poofter” fleischer?

LLS


53 posted on 09/23/2011 3:40:35 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
He was booed for abusing his position for the radical gay agenda ... not for his service... we honor his service... he dishonors himself.

LLS

54 posted on 09/23/2011 3:42:40 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
Not nearly as bad as the teamsters hoffa threatening to take out Conservatives... get some perspective.

LLS

55 posted on 09/23/2011 3:44:19 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

In your post you’ve discussed those subjects more than he did by asking a policy question.

I just don’t get the freaking out. And if you can’t see the difference between pedophilia and two consenting adults doing whatever gross thing they feel like doing together, I don’t know what to say.

Why don’t you petition for him to be tossed out of the military? Does it bother you that gays have served and died to protect your life and liberties? How about non-gays who’ve done things you and I wouldn’t approve of—not every person who serves in the military shares your values.

I don’t get people who freak out over these people anymore than I get what these people are into. Plenty of folks around here probably do things in their own homes I would object to. I couldn’t care less what consenting adults do, even if I find it disgusting. All I ask is that they mind their own business and keep out of mine, and as long as they are not hurting anyone but themselves, it’s none of my business, or yours, frankly.

Just asking a question about a real policy isn’t the end of the world. It sure won’t stop me from voting for representatives who oppose that policy. And I’m just not getting where people get all this anger about something I never think about...until I read your post.


56 posted on 09/23/2011 3:47:44 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: Darkwolf377
From your about page: "I really liked coming here since 9/11/01. Sorry to leave, but this place isn’t for me anymore"

Please by all means, leave again.

58 posted on 09/23/2011 3:52:58 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

If they kept it private, as you say, how do we know that any gay men “bravely served the United States in every war since the Revolution”? We don’t “know” anything of the sort. We can only guess that some may have. Try not to repeat the mantra of the left.


59 posted on 09/23/2011 3:54:32 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PalmettoMason

Why wasn’t “Stephen” identified by his rank?
I didn’t hear the booing, because as soon as the video was over I wondered aloud to my wife why the service member’s rank was not given.
In every case I can think of where a service member is on the news media, they are identified by their rank, even after their ETS.
This stood out to me
************************
I wondered the same, I also wondered why he first sent in a video with his face hidden, then uncovered after the repeal. (as MK made sure to dramatically tell everyone)

Everyone knew DADT was to be repealed, he never needed to cover his face (he could have stipulated if the DADT repeal was somehow blocked, just go with sound or blur his face)

He had on his Iraq tee, he said he had to lie before being deployed to Iraq for fear of losing his job—does that mean somebody broke the DADT law in asking him? Was he suspected?

I just found him suspect or very dramatic.


60 posted on 09/23/2011 3:54:48 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I disagree. When I was in the army, many soldiers behaved poorly. Further, the left has booed our soldiers for decades for doing their duty, and has had no problem doing a heck of a lot worse to our troops than booing one individual.


61 posted on 09/23/2011 3:57:46 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
I’m gonna get the government to FORCE you to like where I like to put my penis.

How do you know he was a pitcher and not a catcher?

62 posted on 09/23/2011 3:58:36 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

That sentence should be repeated from the mountaintops every day.


63 posted on 09/23/2011 4:00:09 AM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

He was boo’ed because he’s bringing his sexual choices into the military. To hell with Fleischer.


64 posted on 09/23/2011 4:00:43 AM PDT by Vision ("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

You keep on saying how you do not care if a soldier is openly homosexual in order to put down others who do very well care.

So if a soldier is openly making it known that he sex with animals are you also alright with that?

Or if a soldier openly admits that he is a pedophile? Do you still not care?

This soldier got booed for being a pervert and deserved such. He should not be serving this nation if he is a pervert so he deserves no additional respect for doing so.


65 posted on 09/23/2011 4:03:15 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

oops, ARMY tee not Iraq


66 posted on 09/23/2011 4:03:52 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

So then you feel the same way about pedophiles?

BS! This soldier is a pervert and deserved to be booed.


67 posted on 09/23/2011 4:04:30 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

The only bad thing was that it was only 3 or 4 people that had the courage to boo. People are so afraid to speak the truth. A Republican debate...full of Republicans.... where people boo or cheer the positions they hear...and only 3 or 4 boo this pervert? A sad day indeed.

If he had asked why he can’t have sex with animals on a military base are we also supposed to respect him as a soldier?


68 posted on 09/23/2011 4:16:53 AM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

I’m not all right with the perverted things you and others think up—who sits around thinking about such gross stuff? Not me. If you say it’s homosexuals, you sure seem to think about what they think about a lot.

If you can’t see the difference between sex with an animal, and sex with a consenting fellow adult, I don’t know what your definition of ‘conservative’ means.

Let me be clear about this, since you folks can’t seem to understand no matter how many times I type it—I’m not condoning anything they or you or anyone else does with a fellow consenting adult because I DO NOT CARE what any two adults do in their own lives. And the reason I do not care is because that’s the conservative way—the government and the rest of us should not be so interested in what CONSENTING ADULT CITIZENS are doing with each other.

This means there are countless people out there doing stuff I wouldn’t do, don’t believe in, and don’t care for.

And so what?

It’s completely different from using the public schools to prosletyze—I’m against that. It’s completely different from giving gays special rights—I’m against that.

But as a conservative, I have NO RIGHT and I certainly don’t give a damn what people do with their own lives.

I can’t figure out what supposed conservatives are so fixated on these subjects—the issue at hand is about a serving military members asking a policy question. That’s it.

What’s funny is how folks here are cheerleading this silly booing, like they’re at a sporting event, when we’re trying to present a reasonable ADULT alternative to the childish left.

Instead we have handed the libs a golden soundbite—conservatives booing the military.

You and others can say over and over and over “We’re not booing his service!” but you simply aren’t grasping the reality.

And please, spare me this: “You keep on saying how you do not care if a soldier is openly homosexual in order to put down others who do very well care.”

Expressing MY point of view isn’t in itself putting down someone who has another point of view. If you think anyone merely having a different position from yours is a put-down, you really need to get over yourself. The world doesn’t revolve around you, and I don’t express my opinion to put anyone else down, merely to express my opinion. If one needs to play victim, that’s the weakest case ever—that someone else doesn’t agree with you. Boo flippin hoo.


69 posted on 09/23/2011 4:16:53 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Booing his sodomy and the forcing of his sin upon me is correct


70 posted on 09/23/2011 4:17:01 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Those “faggot soldiers” have chosen to put themselves in harms way for you, your family, and friends.


71 posted on 09/23/2011 4:19:11 AM PDT by tal hajus ("Thank you sir. May I have another?" GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Booing his sodomy and the forcing of his sin upon me is correct

How is he 'forcing his sin on' you, unless you're hanging around people like that? Good God, the need to pose as the put-upon is positively liberal. No lib gay has ever 'foced his sin' on me--that's disgusting.

I officially give up on this thread. If you think that momentary feel-good of booing a military man is worth the gift of that clip, enjoy.

If we can't think of the larger picture when we want our emotional outbursts above all else, we've already lost the next election--and the gay lobby has already won.

72 posted on 09/23/2011 4:20:16 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

He is the one who said that being gay is *who he is.*

Santorum did a great job. This is social experimentation and shouldn’t be turned into a political game show question.


73 posted on 09/23/2011 4:22:26 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tal hajus
Those “faggot soldiers” have chosen to put themselves in harms way for you, your family, and friends.

You are probably gay but I will say this anyway: frankly, I don't give crap about queer soldiers they can GTH. The only reason why this DADT repeal is flying is that the economy is so bad. As soon (if ever) the economy picks up the volunteer military is finished.

74 posted on 09/23/2011 4:22:32 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
"Man, we can't even show simple respect to our soldiers anymore unless they're "our" kind of soldiers? What the heck is going on here? "

You one of those 'Log Cabin' republicans?

75 posted on 09/23/2011 4:24:10 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
It's IMMORAL and UNNATURAL and a SIN! PERIOD!

Two consenting adults do NOT have God's permisssion to do anything they please.

76 posted on 09/23/2011 4:27:14 AM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Your lack of clarity on this is telling

Forcing the acceptance of sodomy on America is what is happening

Are DRUNKS insisting we accept drunkeness?
Are pedophiles demanding we accept their pedophilia?

Why is one of those true?

And which one is connected to the homo soldier?

Why are homos demanding we accept their homo-ness?

The laws that are being forcedupon people are not just, Holy laws, they are laws that insist we accept the sin of men, that we accept what God has always called sin.

We need to accept the drug addict
we need to accept the drunk
we need to accept the pedophile
we need to accept the racism of some
we need to accept the false religion that orders it’s adherants to kill Christians and Jews

people like you who refuse to say STOP except against laws that tell you to behave...

You MUST be a ron paul fan


77 posted on 09/23/2011 4:29:49 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
How is he 'forcing his sin on' you, unless you're hanging around people like that?

We pay their salaries, Every sailor, soldier, airman and/or marine is a representative of our country. The faggot soldier give the wrong impression, that we are weak and effeminate and not serious like the Europeans. It's dangerous. You are dangerous and are probably gay to boot. Heck maybe that was you in the youtube.

78 posted on 09/23/2011 4:32:20 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Your lack of clarity on this is telling

If that's true, why is your entire post a lie?

I said none of the things you accuse me of.

It's telling that you can't have a discussion based on an opposing opinion. So you just make stuff up.

Since you can't argue my actual position but have to simply bring in all sorts of off-topic stuff as a diversion from your inability to respond to my actual points, you are dismissed.

79 posted on 09/23/2011 4:33:20 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
All I ask is that they mind their own business and keep out of mine, and as long as they are not hurting anyone but themselves, it’s none of my business, or yours, frankly.

_________________________________________

Minding ones own business doesn't usually include announcing a sexual preference, that is asking for a reaction, either of acceptance, rejection, or silence (silence, that's odd, eh--reverse DADT, but they are allowed to break the DA part).

It can be hurtful to the one being addressed, because now you will be forced to hold your opinion, of something that may be highly immoral to you, and if opinion is spoken of non-acceptence--judgement will be rendered--GUILTY-- non-pc homophobe hate crime.

Held up by the media as terrible evil(like this article in several papers, for example) or the military guy who has a negative opinion of homosexuals losing his job if he isn't silent

____________________________________________

Just asking a question about a real policy isn’t the end of the world.

____________________________________________

If a question is asked for the sole reason of an answer--there is no need to declare sexual preference. Just as Santorum stated. The man expected preferential treatment and I highly suspect he wanted to get a reaction. That is not pure of heart and only seeking an answer.

Will Christian beliefs be as protected as sexual preference?

80 posted on 09/23/2011 4:33:28 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I think Dark wolf plays for the other team.


81 posted on 09/23/2011 4:33:45 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

So your point is exactly the same as the point made by the left-wing over and over again....

As long as it is ‘two consenting adults’ then what is wrong with it?

BS. First off you completetly ignore the fact that the term ‘two consenting adults’ needs to be defined and that your entire homosexual rights movement attacks allowing the people to have representation in order to define such things.

Secondly, if you think that ‘two consenting adults’ is such a sacred criteria for respecting any type of perverted sex act the why not ‘three consenting adults’ or how about four or five?

And sorry if I do not want to make special allowances for the perversion of homosexuality the way you want to. I do not care to see much of a difference between those who promote homosexuality or those who promote pedophelia or any other type of perversion. THEY ARE ATTACKING OUR SCHOOLS WITH THIS PERVERSION AGENDA.


82 posted on 09/23/2011 4:34:27 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
Will Christian beliefs be as protected as sexual preference?

I must have missed all the oppression of Christian belief in this country of 80%+ Christians.

Where did all this victim stuff come from? Talk about lefty infiltration.

83 posted on 09/23/2011 4:36:08 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

A man injected a question regarding his personal preferences for alternative sexual gratification into a political venue discerning the next president of the United States ... Perhaps the entire audience should have boo'd him. Poor choice of time and place.


84 posted on 09/23/2011 4:39:56 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf
And sorry if I do not want to make special allowances for the perversion of homosexuality the way you want to.

I have said over and over I do NOT want that, but I've now learned my lesson--you are another of those so scared of true conservative ideas that you can't engage on actual points made, so you just make stuff up.

You can't handle honest discussion, so you smear--just like the left.

I've repeatedly said the homosexuals MUST be stopped if they try to push their stuff in the schools, and MUST be prevented from gaining special rights.

But you can't handle that someone isn't afraid of them as you are, but who simply thinks "What you do isn't my business, but when you try to foist it on the rest of us--THEN it's a problem."

All as a diversion from the real issue--that this clip is solid gold for the left.

Obama thanks you and your scared kind, who can't see the REAL threat from the homosexual lobby.

85 posted on 09/23/2011 4:40:15 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
They weren't booing the soldier. They were booing his comment which was stupid and tiresome.

I have no problem with it myself.

Plus, Santorum's answer was outstanding. God bless him for having the guts to say it. I don't think anyone else up there would have.
86 posted on 09/23/2011 4:42:39 AM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
You can't handle honest discussion, so you smear--just like the left.

Calling someone gay is a smear? au contraire it is perfectly acceptable now right? They should be boo'ed because it is "normal" now right?

Tell us are you gay or not? A simple yes or no will do.

87 posted on 09/23/2011 4:43:24 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
worth noting that gay men have bravely served the United States in every war since the Revolutionary War. However, they kept their personal life private and that is how it should be when serving your country in the serious role of serving in the military.

Yeah, they kept their personal vices private because if they didn't the punishment for sodomy was death.

No idea where you got your info that "gay" soldiers served in the Revolution. If any did, it was the same kind of "gay" that you find in prisons.
88 posted on 09/23/2011 4:45:26 AM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Point missed! There is (or should be) only one kind of soldier...a soldier plain and simple. Anyone who identifies themselves as a ____-Soldier isnt much of a soldier and should be shown the door/released from service. It is a dangerous and destructive distraction from the work at hand (killing our enemy and breaking their stuff). I am living this hell. I have been in service with the Marines for 24 years and am demoralized by the actions of this administration. It should be a non-issue, but because of soldiers like this and other activists on the “inside” it isnt.


89 posted on 09/23/2011 4:49:23 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I hope people enjoyed that boo, cuz you can be sure we’re going to be seeing it over and over and over in the coming months leading up to the election. And it won’t be our side repeating it.

Let them. The more people are forced to think about the "gay" agenda, the less they like it. The narcissistic homo media hasn't figured that out yet.
90 posted on 09/23/2011 4:49:23 AM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I must have missed all the oppression of Christian belief in this country of 80%+ Christians.

Where did all this victim stuff come from? Talk about lefty infiltration
************************

Whoa—I didn’t claim victim. I asked a valid question.


91 posted on 09/23/2011 4:50:14 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Clearly, “The Atlantic” cares more about political correctness than America’s security.


92 posted on 09/23/2011 4:52:25 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("I know that God's tomorrow will be better than today!" A. H. Ackley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

I have the message from the top and they deleted all the references to homosexual conduct from all the manuals. They also deleted stuff about bisexuality etc from all the manuals. I can’t post it here but any one in uniform can verify.


93 posted on 09/23/2011 4:56:13 AM PDT by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
If we can't think of the larger picture when we want our emotional outbursts above all else, we've already lost the next election--and the gay lobby has already won.

Right. Just like they "won" the NY-9 a couple weeks ago?

FACT-the gay issue is only potent in the media. The rest of the country is sick of it and wants it to go away.
94 posted on 09/23/2011 4:56:13 AM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Right. Just like they "won" the NY-9 a couple weeks ago?

Last try: What does that have to do with anything? I said they "won" a victory by having this video to show over and over, and you know Maddow and that bunch WILL.

FACT-the gay issue is only potent in the media. The rest of the country is sick of it and wants it to go away.

Good God, we agree on something, even if you don't know it.

People seem to forget how gay marriage was a stealth issue in the 2004 campaign. It won't be this time around because it's not on the front burner. But that's why THIS sort of thing is just what the gay lobby wants.

95 posted on 09/23/2011 5:00:05 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

We can’t say homosexual anymore. That would land you in the EO office. The correct term is gay.


96 posted on 09/23/2011 5:00:46 AM PDT by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Tell us are you gay or not? A simple yes or no will do.
***************
Darkwolf isn’t gay [s]he has stated [s]he doesn’t approve of it, but wishes for a more live and let live.


97 posted on 09/23/2011 5:01:02 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

If Palin’s running, as her drones assert, it is *convenient* she doesn’t (yet) have to participate in these debates and actually answer questions. Her response to this would be priceless. I’ll bet we won’t see any tweets or Facebook posts from her in regard to this. Better safe than sorry, eh Sarah?


98 posted on 09/23/2011 5:01:36 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

Are you gay?


99 posted on 09/23/2011 5:03:55 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Are you gay?
***************
No, are you? hahaha! :p


100 posted on 09/23/2011 5:07:01 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson