[lbryce]

One man's worst moment is another man's finest, most heroic hour.

[Vision]

He was boo’ed because he’s bringing his sexual choices into the military. To hell with Fleischer.

[so_real]

A man injected a question regarding his personal preferences for alternative sexual gratification into a political venue discerning the next president of the United States ... Perhaps the entire audience should have boo'd him. Poor choice of time and place.

[Antoninus]

They weren't booing the soldier. They were booing his comment which was stupid and tiresome.

I have no problem with it myself.

Plus, Santorum's answer was outstanding. God bless him for having the guts to say it. I don't think anyone else up there would have.

[MayflowerMadam]

Clearly, “The Atlantic” cares more about political correctness than America’s security.

[jla]

If Palin’s running, as her drones assert, it is *convenient* she doesn’t (yet) have to participate in these debates and actually answer questions. Her response to this would be priceless. I’ll bet we won’t see any tweets or Facebook posts from her in regard to this. Better safe than sorry, eh Sarah?

[SoJoCo]

"Any type of sexual activity has no place in the military," former senator Rick Santorum told Hill

Thousands of hookers and bargirls just had heart attacks.

[bray]

He was booed for promoting the homosexual agenda. He should be thrown out of the army for homosexuality or at least tested for steroids. People are sick and tired of tolerance politics.

Santorum hit a home run on that question.

Pray for America

[Graybeard58]

In Tampa, Fla., at the CNN-Tea Party Express debate, the audience cheered the idea of letting an uninsured 30-year-old man die (video) without care, greeting the idea with applause and shouts of "Yeah!"

More accurately, they cheered Paul's answer, which by the way, was one of the more lucid things he has ever said.

[RetSignman]

When I served in the military, ( ‘58- ‘62 ) it was, by law, forbidden for military members to engage in a media public debate on politics.

My question is, was that law stricken from the the books and, if not, was this ‘proud’ homosexual soldier in violation of military Code?

[MadelineZapeezda]

How do we know that these jerks aren’t Demoncratic plants???

[fwdude]

They were clearly booing the DADT repeal. That was what was being flaunted by the homosexual soldier, and THAT is what was being booed.

Idiots.

[manc]

think many of us are missing the point here.

WHEN THE HELL DID HOMOSEXUALITY BECOME JUST NORMAL ?
That is what we should be asking not whether some booed a homosexuals or booed the question.

It’s down right not normal and if anyone thinks it is then why are they on here anyway plus I suggest they think about what these deviants do to each other and how they act.

Got a pal and he had no problem either with them but one day the guy at his work asked for a life home as his car was broken down.
He then dropped him off and then saw him to go another guy at the house and on the way home my pal thought to himself what they were doing to each other right there and then and since that he has been disgusted by them.

IT IS NOT NORMAL and they should not be in the military and do need to be told they need help.
As for those who say they have because they have a friend who is a queer then think about what they are dong and then would that person not have a problem because their friend has sex with their pet dog, young girl,daughter etc?

[jwalsh07]

This was a political event and some soldier who self identifies by his sexuality asked a political question. So what if that question got booed. Hell, I booed soldiers when I was in the Army and even punched a couple in the face. They got over it.