Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBigIf

I’m not all right with the perverted things you and others think up—who sits around thinking about such gross stuff? Not me. If you say it’s homosexuals, you sure seem to think about what they think about a lot.

If you can’t see the difference between sex with an animal, and sex with a consenting fellow adult, I don’t know what your definition of ‘conservative’ means.

Let me be clear about this, since you folks can’t seem to understand no matter how many times I type it—I’m not condoning anything they or you or anyone else does with a fellow consenting adult because I DO NOT CARE what any two adults do in their own lives. And the reason I do not care is because that’s the conservative way—the government and the rest of us should not be so interested in what CONSENTING ADULT CITIZENS are doing with each other.

This means there are countless people out there doing stuff I wouldn’t do, don’t believe in, and don’t care for.

And so what?

It’s completely different from using the public schools to prosletyze—I’m against that. It’s completely different from giving gays special rights—I’m against that.

But as a conservative, I have NO RIGHT and I certainly don’t give a damn what people do with their own lives.

I can’t figure out what supposed conservatives are so fixated on these subjects—the issue at hand is about a serving military members asking a policy question. That’s it.

What’s funny is how folks here are cheerleading this silly booing, like they’re at a sporting event, when we’re trying to present a reasonable ADULT alternative to the childish left.

Instead we have handed the libs a golden soundbite—conservatives booing the military.

You and others can say over and over and over “We’re not booing his service!” but you simply aren’t grasping the reality.

And please, spare me this: “You keep on saying how you do not care if a soldier is openly homosexual in order to put down others who do very well care.”

Expressing MY point of view isn’t in itself putting down someone who has another point of view. If you think anyone merely having a different position from yours is a put-down, you really need to get over yourself. The world doesn’t revolve around you, and I don’t express my opinion to put anyone else down, merely to express my opinion. If one needs to play victim, that’s the weakest case ever—that someone else doesn’t agree with you. Boo flippin hoo.

69 posted on 09/23/2011 4:16:53 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

So your point is exactly the same as the point made by the left-wing over and over again....

As long as it is ‘two consenting adults’ then what is wrong with it?

BS. First off you completetly ignore the fact that the term ‘two consenting adults’ needs to be defined and that your entire homosexual rights movement attacks allowing the people to have representation in order to define such things.

Secondly, if you think that ‘two consenting adults’ is such a sacred criteria for respecting any type of perverted sex act the why not ‘three consenting adults’ or how about four or five?

And sorry if I do not want to make special allowances for the perversion of homosexuality the way you want to. I do not care to see much of a difference between those who promote homosexuality or those who promote pedophelia or any other type of perversion. THEY ARE ATTACKING OUR SCHOOLS WITH THIS PERVERSION AGENDA.

82 posted on 09/23/2011 4:34:27 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson