Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Funding crisis: Senate blocks House bill
Politico ^

Posted on 09/23/2011 10:11:28 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Funding crisis: Senate blocks House bill

By: Jake Sherman and Manu Raju September 23, 2011 08:56 AM EDT

Senate Democrats on Friday blocked a House Republican stopgap budget plan, intensifying a bitter impasse that threatens to bring government operations to a halt in a matter of days.

On a 59-36 vote, the Senate voted to table the House plan, just the latest escalation in a government spending crisis that has dominated Capitol Hill this year.

The vote now threatens to derail next week’s congressional recess, dry up federal funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency by early next week and shutdown many government operations by Sept. 30 — unless both parties and chambers can reach an accord in a matter of days.

Still, senators and House members were scrambling behind the scenes to find a solution Friday afternoon.

After approving their seven-week stopgap funding bill after midnight, senior House officials say members will start leaving town early this afternoon, a move that could pressure the Senate into approving their bill over the staunch opposition of Hill Democrats. Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said the House is planning to be out of session after votes this morning.

“This is why people don’t like Washington,” Cantor said Friday, referring to the impasse.

“There is no other option than for the Senate to pass our bill. That’s it. That’s all. There is no next step,” said a senior House Republican aide.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; debt; democratcorruption; democrats; fema; green; liberalfascism; reid; shutdown; spending

1 posted on 09/23/2011 10:11:32 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

DON’T GIVE IN!


2 posted on 09/23/2011 10:14:19 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“There is no other option than for the Senate to pass our bill. That’s it. That’s all. There is no next step,”

It is only a 7 week continuing resolution.

This is such political bullshit, and these idiots wonder why there is such contempt for all politicians.

3 posted on 09/23/2011 10:16:59 AM PDT by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

‘Funding Crisis’

Ya know... With the amount of tax dollars wasted in Washington, I really can’t say we have a funding crisis. Now comes the predictable headlines and talking points from the socialists, good luck sellin’ - I ain’t buyin.


4 posted on 09/23/2011 10:18:13 AM PDT by Made In The USA (This post may be recorded for quality purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
On a 59-36 vote, the Senate voted to table the House plan

The current party split is 53 (Dem and "Independents" voting with the Dems) - 47 Republicans. That means at least 6 Republicans voted to table this bill.

5 posted on 09/23/2011 10:19:42 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA
Reid is blocking the vote. Thus he can be blamed for this debacle.

The President also says he will veto anything that doesn't have a tax increase - doubling down on his campaign and candidacy to Raise Taxes.

A Walter Mondale if I ever saw one.

6 posted on 09/23/2011 10:21:32 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Spending bills have to originate in the HoR as per the Constitution. The House should vote on the same bill again and send it to Harry.


7 posted on 09/23/2011 10:22:18 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The measure failed 230 to 195. Only six Democrats voted for it, while 182 Democrats voted against. More significantly, 48 conservative Republicans opposed the measure.

According to the Washington Times and other sources, the conservative Republicans are willing to vote in favor of additional funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to deal with the recent flooding along the eastern seaboard but they want corresponding budget cuts to ensure federal government spending stays within the debt limit agreed to in July/August.

Reportedly, Democrats overwhelmingly opposed the measure because it offset $1.5 billion of $3.65 billion in disaster relief funding with a cut to a program that loans money to car companies to encourage the production of energy-efficient cars. They believe the government sponsored energy-efficient car loans program create jobs and FEMA, strained by repeated natural disasters, both need more funding.

After the vote last night, the main stream media glossed over the 182 Democrats that opposed the measure and immediately began to focus on the 48 Republicans who are "refusing to compromise". While there is no doubt more of the story yet to be told, one has to wonder why Congress (especially considering the recent struggles over the debt ceiling and the resulting dissatisfaction with both Republicans and Democrats in Congress) would immediately return to traditional spending practices.

Arguably, the general public is looking for fiscal restraint and responsibility, even if it means cutting current spending to fund emergency aid. This, however, is not necessarily where the main stream media or, for that matter, the majority of our Congressional membership is focused.

We should now expect the media to focus on the 48 House members who voted against the measure with terms like "obstructionists" and "ideologues" instead of the real problem(s) that face our nation and our future. The problem is the debt; the debt is the result of the spending. Our representatives must get control of the spending and start to reduce real (not just projected) spending.

8 posted on 09/23/2011 10:23:31 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Democrats Are Obstructionists!
9 posted on 09/23/2011 10:25:21 AM PDT by Obadiah (Okay, so what's the speed of dark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
That means at least 6 Republicans voted to table this bill.

Hmmm. Wonder which ones...


10 posted on 09/23/2011 10:27:06 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
GOP = Party of OBSTRUCTION !!! Watch the news announcements later today. It is a given...............
11 posted on 09/23/2011 10:27:57 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

The dims are desperate to continue funding their union allies.

If the unionized companies go broke before the election it will hurt Obama’s reelection bid.


12 posted on 09/23/2011 10:35:03 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Send a bill with more spending cuts and make them wish they passed this current bill.


13 posted on 09/23/2011 10:38:58 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: darth

In a floor speech, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) deemed the Republican’s FEMA bill “frugal and cheap.” Criticizing the bill for its offsets from the DOE program, Ellison said the bill “is the most stingy, short-sighted, poorest form of representative government I’ve ever seen. It is outrageous to tell Americans facing disaster that you don’t get any help unless you can find how to squeeze it out somewhere.”


14 posted on 09/23/2011 10:39:41 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

There were also about 6 Republicans that would vote against it because it is too liberal.


15 posted on 09/23/2011 10:40:03 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

you forgot Brown! The vote totals not yet available on roll call


16 posted on 09/23/2011 10:41:12 AM PDT by BillGunn (Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BillGunn
you forgot Brown! The vote totals not yet available on roll call

Could be, but I'm still sticking with my first five...

17 posted on 09/23/2011 10:43:26 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Its not a crisis. The rats have a bill and they can pass it in the senate.


18 posted on 09/23/2011 10:44:23 AM PDT by tobyhill (A Democrat that doesn't lie would be a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
The republicans that voted to table: Toomey, Risch, Paul, Lee and Johnson.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00151

19 posted on 09/23/2011 10:48:18 AM PDT by BillGunn (Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Just shut the whole damn mess down. Keep it shut down until Jan 2013. I don’t think they realize how many millions of us out here would be extremely pleased if they shut it all down and went home.


20 posted on 09/23/2011 10:48:58 AM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Now it will go back to the House and Boehner will bend over, AGAIN. The CR they sent OVER was already $24 BILLION MORE than the Ryan Budget protocols. NOW they’re gonna “negotiate” with the Senate to WASTE EVEN MORE?! WILL BOEHNER and these “Establishment Republicans” NEVER LEARN?! WILL the “Tea Party” Rep’s that were elected EVER FINALLY MEAN IT when they claim they stand against waste, FOR balancing the budget — that they will STOP IT!?! Or will the majority cave yet again??


21 posted on 09/23/2011 11:08:27 AM PDT by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

Boehner needs to be shuttled aside and let Ryan become Speaker.


22 posted on 09/23/2011 11:13:38 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

That was Monday.
The House Dems wanted more money but the House leadership cut another $100 million instead and got more conservative votes to pass it last night LOL!
(They cut it out of the program that funded Solyndra LOL again!)

So far this is outstanding, though the cuts are tiny.


23 posted on 09/23/2011 11:17:22 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Not Monday- Wednesday.


24 posted on 09/23/2011 11:21:40 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Send a bill with more spending cuts and make them wish they passed this current bill.

About $50B per day would work. 

After a week, it should go to $100B per day.

25 posted on 09/23/2011 11:25:38 AM PDT by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Yes, then Harry could pick this current bill back up and offer it up for a vote. Until Harry allows a vote, the House should repeatedly resupply the Senate with newer more caustic versions than the previous one as you suggested. But then again, we are talking about Boehner growing a pair.


26 posted on 09/23/2011 11:33:59 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson