Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Space Woe: Blurry Vision
Discovery ^ | 9/22/11 | Irene Klotz

Posted on 09/23/2011 1:34:19 PM PDT by LibWhacker

A newly discovered affliction has some doctors wondering if astronauts traveling to Mars could be blind by the time they got there.

A new study of astronauts shows that radiation and bone loss aren't the only health risks for long-duration stays in space. About one-third of the U.S. space station crew members return with impaired vision, a condition in which at least one case was permanent.

The data has been slow in coming since astronauts can be disqualified from flying if they have serious ailments.

"These are guys who really don't like to complain about physical issues because it may ground them. They're desire is to get back into space, so they are not complainers," neurosurgeon Bruce Ehni at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, told Discovery News.

But in 2005, one unnamed astronaut came forward to reveal his affliction, prompting a survey of the corps. NASA discovered 35 percent of its former space station crew members, who typically spend about six months in orbit, experience visual acuity issues, agency spokesman Mike Curie told Discovery News.

"It wasn't until a couple of years ago when we started seeing this on station that we injected true acuity scans and MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging) to produce actual medical data. That type of exact data does not exist from the shuttle astronauts," who typically spent two weeks in space, Curie added.

The condition isn't serious enough to cause blindness in the short term, but it raises concern about what would happen to astronauts during a three-year mission to Mars. The vision loss seems to be due to a swelling of the optic nerve, a condition similar to a disease on Earth called pseudotumor cerebri, which mostly afflicts heavy women.

"Nobody knows why pseudotumor cerebri occurs, but it's a condition which, if left untreated in some people who are really afflicted badly with it, can lead to complete blindness," Ehni said.

"The question is 'Is there a possibility that an astronaut on a very long mission could arrive at the end of that mission unable to see, or be so visual compromised that he'd be non-functional?' The possibility is real enough that they need to look into this," Ehni said.

With a relatively small pool of subjects to study -- around 30 U.S. astronauts have lived on the International Space Station -- doctors have not been able to determine if age, gender or previous spaceflight experience affect vision loss.

Doctors believe the redistribution of cerebral spinal fluid in weightlessness is to blame, though that doesn't fully explain the situation.

"Right now we don't have enough data on this to see what is going to happen," said NASA astronaut Don Pettit, who is preparing for launch in December for his second stint aboard the space station. "Right now, I'm not concerned."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blurry; nasa; space; vision; weightlessness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: LibWhacker
They will have to build some type of spinning enclosure...


21 posted on 09/23/2011 2:31:32 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I would like to meet up with John Glenn and ask him some good questions.


22 posted on 09/23/2011 2:32:19 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yep. The real question is how much artificial gravity does it take to essentially eliminate all the gravity related health issues. It could be that it doesn’t take very much - but who knows... Another interesting question is what is the optimum gravity vector? I’d assume the standing position but I’ve not heard of this being a problem for people on their back stuck in bed.


23 posted on 09/23/2011 2:36:00 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

I don’t think that centrifugal force is the equivalent to actual gravitational force which draws masses together with atomic force (gravitational waves?). Would it be as effective at slowing the body’s atrophy? Then there is the problem of unblocked gamma radiation - we could not lift enough lead shielding into orbit to block it. I just don’t think we are biologically able to withstand extended missions.


24 posted on 09/23/2011 3:29:50 PM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I’m with you! Bring back Orion, as originally envisioned by the Freeman Dyson team. Make it clear to other nations that we intend to go forward with it and renegotiate the atmospheric test ban treaty to allow the launch of such manned behemoths.


25 posted on 09/23/2011 4:09:05 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I think its going to take something nuclear.


26 posted on 09/23/2011 4:19:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
Einstein's Equivalence Principle.

We could easily lift all the steel shielding we could ever possibly want if only we brought back Project Orion. We could lift a ship the size of the Empire State Building, clad in 24" steel plate, with a crew of 5,000 aboard, if we wanted to. We just need the will to do it.

27 posted on 09/23/2011 4:20:00 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Faster than light... They'd get there yesterday; i.e., they day before they left.
28 posted on 09/23/2011 4:23:32 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Once in space you could mine out a small asteroid and fly it like a ship.

I think it was John Glenn who has talked about adjusting the orbits of a half dozen asteroids and using them as a conveyor to mars for material. In fact something like that would be fine for moving people if they aren’t in a hurry.


29 posted on 09/23/2011 4:29:04 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

Actually,

You`d arrive on Mars BEFORE you left Earth.

Anyway, can anyone explain how ANYONE could survive in space when being bombarded with radiation.

Can`t see any long term space travel by humans ever.


30 posted on 09/23/2011 4:40:39 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yup, I’ve heard that idea, too.

Anything but zipping around in low-earth orbit in a tin can. Especially when we spend billions on the can, then hand it over to the Russians on a silver platter.


31 posted on 09/23/2011 4:43:25 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
Anyway, can anyone explain how ANYONE could survive in space when being bombarded with radiation.

Shielding, just like nuclear reactors here on earth. Lifting the heavy shielding into orbit is entirely doable but extremely expensive.
32 posted on 09/23/2011 4:49:52 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson