delenda est...
Posted on 09/23/2011 5:08:35 PM PDT by RetSignman
It would seem as if simply claiming to be gay while in uniform would not be a violation, while speaking out for or against the repeal of DADT while in uniform would be a violation.
AMEN!
That’s been my observation. It started on the first day.
It’s the incrementalism modus operandi, and it is no surprise to anyone (even if they claim otherwise):
1. The agitators (the activists who were pressing for the “right to serve openly”) now have won what they said they wanted (the “right” to serve openly), yet they have not wrapped activist organizations that they founded for that alleged purpose - no, they will keep drawing salaries an raising funds and will find new angles to agitate.
2. The homosexuals all served deceitfully: they were breaking federal criminal laws whenever they engaged in any homosexual sex acts, whenever they admitted to anyone they were homosexual, or whenver they got gay “married” or attempted to get gay “married”. We are now supposed to applaud them when they “come out” despite their years of lies and lawlessness. When they showed up at work and announced their gayness and their longtime partner or faux gay “spouse”, the response is supposed to be “how wonderful - you’ve been breaking federal criminal law all these years - its so exciting that your years of lawlessness are offically forgotten (but of course you should feel free to bring those same years of decpetion lies and criminal activity up when convenient to prove how bigoted everyone was and still is)!
3. The Army policy was to ignore the federal criminal law. The homosexual lobby convinced the Army leaders to ignore the law and to encourage all troops and commanders to ignore the law. I am amazed that such disregard for laws duly enacted by congress was considered to be good “leadership” and good policy, let alone tolerated.
4. The day DADT was lifted, the same activists demanded more: full recognition of gaymarriedness and all the benefits that go along with that, and I am sure some will insist that there be homosexual promotion quotas and homosexual reparations and homosexual badges, and rainbow flags will be put on barracks doors to help homosexuals know which rooms are safe from “homofauxbes” and (but of course it might also indicate which guys will give head and which girls will strap on a dildo).
5. The activist attitude will immediately infest the barracks and posts/bases everywhere. The barracks will become like college campuses.
6. We will lose a war because of this.
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
ART. 125. SODOMY
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Note: For specific details concerning this offense, including elements of proof, maximum punishments, and detailed explanation, see Punitive Articles of the UCMJ at: http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/mcm/blmcm.htm.
This is my gun,
This is for fighting,
This is for fun.
I do believe that a homosexual can serve their country well. I believe a homosexual male can be an effective Soldier ( I say male, because, well, I don't believe females, gay or straight ought to be fighting)- but only under DADT. Only by following the rules, restrictions and disciplines put forward.
Fighting men should not have to be concerned about social issues, they should not have to be concerned that something they say or do will “offend” a homosexual soldier.
Shit. I can't even say what I need to say, but I will keep trying.
If a homosexual can not take the DISCIPLINE that is required of a SOLDIER, if he or she joins to prove a sexual friggin point, rather than love of country..they are.. a detriment for that reason alone.
I would suggest that all straight males leave the armed forces - for love of Country. Don't tolerate it, don't be PC, you are MEN! Don't put yourselves in the position pf being court masrshalled because some gay guy does not like a word you uttered.
Let this pResident have his girly man force - send them out to fight - MAKE THEM fight and live in the dirt, if they want to think they can be soldiers - let ‘em have it! They are only in it to make trouble for you - so remove yourselves from their deviant political posturing. Make them try and BE what they will never be.
You wonderful MEN in the forces, can be here, as citizens and protect this Country whether or not you are officially sanctioned.
Does anyone really think some Frisco Flamer is going to want to go to Afghanistan, Iraq or wherever to defend our country?
The ones who will make a big deal are just Marxists with an agenda.
No! LOL! They just want the attention.
I say, ya wanna talk that talk? Then, walk the walk you friggin freak!
I don't want our real men to play a part. The fags want to fight, but they want to fight the system, they don't expect to really fight an enemy.....I say, let them fight in the hot sands of the ME, that will change their tune real quick! And I don't want them to have real men as back up, I want a full gay force out..yeah, come on out and fight, gay guy..
Look at that fag creep who leaked all the classified info. I can see perverts joining the military to ruin it and advance their agenda and personal gratification.
It’s sickening and destructive beyond words.
Ultimately, arguing for the right to be openly homosexual, that is, to make one’s sexual preferences in the bedroom known to the world, is an exercise in self-centeredness. To enshrine this as a right within an organization that depends, for its members very survival and its own ability to fulfill its mission, on the sacrifice of the individual for the good of whole is ultimately self-defeating. DADT is the proper policy. We are now going to substitute one extreme of policy for the other (i.e. the old, old one), and probably far more demoralizing and destructive, one. How sad. The Obama administration, with its chief purpose being, manifestly, “community organizing” (community balkanizing) rather than governing for the good of the people and with the consent of the people, is a poison in the body politic of these United States cannot long afford.
In the old days, they used to give them desk jobs; driver’s jobs; or as medics (if they had any skills.)
Now they all want 4 stars for their bedroom antics!
They already commit the majority of sexual offenses.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Where are the Rs? Why are they dead silent? Words fail me.
I want to thank all for their comments on my short lived article.
While our politicians pontificate and try to secure their next election or first election, they studiously ignore the red elephant in the room.
Our Republic has been ripped apart from the inside and now the same thing is being instituted in our military.
They will try to calm the masses declaring...Don’t worry we’ll get our country back in 2012 as they walk through the the debris and wreckage that used to be the last hope for the world and told to just wait.
They proclaim obama is a joke, incompetent and ignorant of what our country is all about. In truth, he is absolutely aware what makes our country great and what makes it work.
He has to know in order to take all the right measures to destroy it.
I disagree that DADT was better than "ask and out the door if answer is wrong". I've heard from many current and former military that any homosexuals at all are destructive, "out", "Not out", under DADT or before it. Mentally ill sex perverts do NOT belong in the military at all.
Can't say it any better than that.
It’s sickening and destructive beyond words.
They want to ruin the military - absolutely.
That is why I say if they want a gay army - let them have it.
Let those sissy gays go to iraq, iran, wherever bambi chooses to send them. Deprive them of their "I need to be clean incessant showers", let their limbs be blown off, their bellies feels hunger, let them choose between muslim "innocents" and their own lives, let them TRY and be MEN.
Give them their demands at playing they are men and make them live with the consequence.
I do not want our real men and women to be part of this. Let the Gays have what they have chosen. It won;t take long before they are screaming like babies to be released.
But what I really want to know is whether the Defense Department is going to change the aircraft roundel to the goatse.
Sorry you disagree. But common sense tells me that there have been homosexuals in nearly every walk of life from ancient times until now. Those that have, for the good of their neighbors, kept their proclivities to themselves have done little damage to the society as a whole. Those who have insisted on making their proclivities known have done great damage. I could say the same of serial adulterers, which is approximately what active homosexuality is. Some of each of these two morally afflicted types have struggled against their weakness (it used to be called sin), and others have given in to it and sought to justify both it and themselves. Ultimately, both sets of behavior are self-centered, self-destructive, and, worst of all, destructive of their neighbors. And for the sake of their own self-gratification they do not care. Only societal shame has held such behaviors in check in time past. When shame has been generally lost in a society that society does not have long to live. One need only read history ... an exercise many Americans, sadly, find pointless.
delenda est...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.