As I understand it, if the mandate is struck down, it makes the rest of the act unworkable; the non-health-care system will quickly run out of money if the socialists can’t seize money from our bank accounts every month for this new atrocity. Do I understand this correctly, UVNV?
As I understand(stood) it, if one part is struck down as un-Constitutional, the whole thing is as during passage, "they" (pelosi, reid, bam and company) didn't realize there was no sever-ability clause in the bill (which evidently is a pretty common thing under normal circumstances). They can't just "strip" pieces out of it out and march right along.
Hope the Supreme's still like feeling "supreme"; cause if they don't smack this one down hard they'll be nothing more than a kangaroo court in a failed country.
/Sleep well, Kennedy.