Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: American Quilter
As I understand(stood) it, if one part is struck down as un-Constitutional, the whole thing is as during passage, "they" (pelosi, reid, bam and company) didn't realize there was no sever-ability clause in the bill (which evidently is a pretty common thing under normal circumstances). They can't just "strip" pieces out of it out and march right along.
Hope the Supreme's still like feeling "supreme"; cause if they don't smack this one down hard they'll be nothing more than a kangaroo court in a failed country.

/Sleep well, Kennedy.

34 posted on 09/28/2011 4:15:46 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Michael Barnes

So that means that if the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, the whole act is overturned?


35 posted on 09/28/2011 4:24:19 PM PDT by American Quilter (aka American Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson