Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Righthaven's Losing Streak Continues in Colorado
eff ^ | September 28th, 2011 | Julie Samuels

Posted on 09/28/2011 3:14:34 PM PDT by george76

In what is becoming a well-settled pattern, Righthaven again finds itself on the losing end of a motion, with its case thrown out and owing the defendant – here, Leland Wolf, proprietor of the It Makes Sense Blog – costs and attorneys' fees for bringing a baseless copyright case. The lawsuit, Righthaven v. Wolf, is also notable for being the leading case among more than 50 that were filed in Colorado. Pending a motion to dismiss, the Colorado court stayed the remaining cases. With this ruling, the court has hopefully rung the death knell for the other remaining live cases in that district (joining the Nevada cases that have also been dismissed.)

Some background: In March, Righthaven sued Mr. Wolf for alleging infringing a Denver Post photograph titled “TSA Agent performs enhanced pat-downs," by virtue of a parody of the photo posted on his blog. Mr. Wolf moved to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; EFF filed an amicus brief supporting that motion, explaining that Righthaven lacks ownership of any exclusive right granted under Section 106 of the Copyright Act


We are pleased that the Court refused to allow Righthaven to proceed with a lawsuit based on a copyright that it never owned and never had any plans to exploit

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: copyright; copyrighttroll; digitalmedia; fairuse; righthaven; tsa

1 posted on 09/28/2011 3:14:40 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; kristinn

Cue Nelson Muntz...

2 posted on 09/28/2011 3:16:42 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I am glad they are getting their butts handed to them, but, it is too bad for the people who have settled already. They can’t back out of their agreements.

3 posted on 09/28/2011 3:42:56 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Doggone, somebody finally turned to that TSA picture showing an agent on the job patting down somebody inside a government owned facility.

Without a RELEASE from TSA and the agent and the private individual this picture had no copyright valid for commercial use.

Obviously the Righthaven operation put that picture into play as a commercial venture.

End of story.

It's a bit more complex in the way the lawyers handled it, but Righthaven not only didn't have a valid copyright, the people they purchaed the rights from didn't have a valid copyright either, and that individual being patted down is probably owed damages for the failure to get his release.

Just like to remind folks that I made predictions about which way Righthaven cases were going the second I saw that photo!

Those predictions jsut came true.

4 posted on 09/28/2011 3:53:32 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

A good lawyer can get you out of any agreement, particularly one involving FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION.

5 posted on 09/28/2011 3:54:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson