Replies

One more time. The Republican party is a coalition ~ just like the Democrats, but it is structured differently at the fundamental operating level.

Whereas a potential candidate for public office might be belched up from one of the Democrat's special interests, the Republican candidates typically arrive as self-starters who want to be professional politicians.

The Republicans don't need to work as ward or precinct chairman, or county chairman, or whatever to get a shot at running for office. A Democrat will typically be both a union officer AND a county chairman, or belong to a trade group, or some Leftist propaganda organization, or maybe even a large aggregation of foundations focused on a single item ~ e.g. abortion. The Democrats get their party muscle from thees pressure groups else they have no one.

The Republicans, in contrast, have traditionally drawn on the lower ranks of business organizations or entrepreneurial class folks (many of them lawyers in independent practice) for their party structure operatives.

For the most part these people value their time in their business and do not seek political office ~ just influence.

Traditionally these Republican "Country Clubbers" have provided manpower and money to Republican party campaigns ~ making many candidates rather dependent on the "Country Clubber" class.

To think of them as the Establishment is an error. They are the operating arm of the party ~ not the ideological part.

For Republican ideology you have to look outwards to "the chattering classes", to the Conservative movement, to the folks who have actually run for and held public office! More recently the Conservative movement metastitized and spun off the TEA Party which operates more like a Democrat pressure group, and actually advocates on behalf of its own candidates ~ just like they were the NEA pushing some old socialist warhorse who had been a public school teacher half her life.

That may be why so many folks fail to understand the TEA Party operation ~ it's very much like the groups in the Democrat coalition. Could be why the TEA Partiers so often fail to grasp the place of the "Country Clubbers" ~ who have been running and paying for the party all along.

I suppose this could have been anticipated. After all the Republican party found itself with milions of new adherents when the Democrat grasp on the Solid South broke ~ and that old Democrat element does look remarkably like the TEA Party if you think about it.

Then, there were all the Roman Catholics who dumped the Democrats ~ but the Republicans don't have the same sort of special interest coalitions as the Democrats, so they were left kind of wandering off to find "something" ~ and there's the "Country Clubbers" who at least have a common background of interest with the monied classes and small business folks.

But, the fits are not perfect. They actually never were. Remember, the Republican party was created to displace the WHIG PARTY and to give a political home to the ABOLITIONISTS. It wasn't designed to be perfect, but at the same time it was intended to drive the Democrat ideologues from the public square, and it did so.

Currently the Country Clubbers own the party machinery ~ top to bottom! That's normally the case. However, they are NOT the Establishment ~ just the workerbees who make the it possible for the professional political class to run for office.

The Establishment are the folks who pay the money ~ whether it's that "Old Kenosha Money" that keeps Mitt Romney and that crowd in business, or Rockefeller and his rich friends, or the Borg Warner gang (that gave us Barry Goldwater), or even the producers and commercial interests in California who were willing to pay for Ronald Reagan's campaigns!

It's up to us to advise the Establishment advised regarding the ideological reliability of the most apparent candidates ~ and to ride herd on the Country Clubbers to make sure they don't mistake their narrower self-interest for the broader public interest.