Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Census Bureau Admits It 'Artificially Inflated the Number of Same-Sex Couples'
CNSNEWS.COM ^ | September 28, 2011 | Elizabeth Harrington

Posted on 09/29/2011 6:48:09 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o

The Census Bureau admitted Tuesday that it had “artificially inflated the number of same-sex couples” in the United States, initially reporting a number that was about 40 percent higher than what it now believes is accurate.

The original data published by the 2010 Census set the number of same-sex households in the U.S. in 2010 at 901,997, including 349,377 same-sex married couple households and 552,620 same-sex unmarried partner households.

But the Census Bureau said in a Tuesday conference call with reporters that it has revised these numbers downward “because Census Bureau staff discovered an inconsistency in the responses in the 2010 Census summary file statistics that artificially inflated the number of same-sex couples.”

The Census Bureau now says the 2010 Census found that there were 131,729 same-sex married couple households and 514,735 same-sex unmarried partner households in the United States--for a total of 646,464 same-sex-couple households.

Given that the Census Bureau says there were 116,716,292 total households in the United States in 2010, that means same-sex households made up only 0.55 percent of the total. Had there actually been 901,997 same-sex households in the United States--the "artificially inflated" number the Census Bureau originally reported--that would have equaled ony 0.77 percent of the households in the country.

According to the Census Bureau, the problem with the Census data on same-sex couples was due to “data capture errors” that were caused by the confusing layout on the 2010 Census forms--“the matrix format”--where entering a person’s sex often did not accurately reflect that person’s gender.

Households are identified as same-sex based on the sex of the responder and the relationship of the household members, as either unmarried partner or husband or wife, according to the Census Bureau.

Boxes on the Census form for “male” and “female” were stacked on top of each other, making it more likely for a person to mark the wrong gender or make erroneous lines, changing the results.

“After discovering the inconsistency, Census Bureau staff developed another set of estimates to provide a more accurate way to measure same-sex couple households,” the news release said.

“The revised figures were developed by using an index of names to re-estimate the number of same-sex married and unmarried partners by the sex commonly associated with the person's first name,” the Census Bureau said.

The Census Bureau “Names Index” matched common names to their corresponding genders, such as identifying “John” or “Thomas” as male and “Elizabeth” and “Virginia” as female. The index helped solve the “name-sex inconsistencies” which had increased the numbers of same-sex couples.

After it accounted for the “data capture errors,” the number of same-sex couples in the country was revised to 646,464 from 901,997. Thus, the Census Bureau had "artificially inflated" the number of same-sex couples by 255,533--or 39.5 percent.

The Census Bureau said that the errors were not realized until it was too late to alter the 2010 forms.

But the inaccuracies prompted the Bureau to devise a “Preferred Estimate,” revealed Tuesday, to more accurately depict the incidences of same-sex households, according to Martin O’Connell, chief of the Fertility and Family Statistics Branch of the U.S. Census Bureau, during a conference call to highlight the new data.

“There is no dispute that same-sex couple population increased between 2000 and 2010," said O’Connell, during the briefing.

“What we tried to do was try to get a better grip on exactly what the numbers were and what the actual increase was,” he said. "We tried to eliminate population numbers that seemed artificially high using this estimate, and that's what we came up with."

In 2000, the number of same-sex households, as calculated by the 2000 Census, was 594,391.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: damnlies; homonaziagenda; homonazism; homopsychoagenda; homopsychos; homosexualagenda; lies; statistics
There are a LOT of "same-sex" households that have nothing to do with bed-buddies, sexual orientation, or X-rated behavior.

An older dad and his adult son.

Two Mormon missionary lads.

A disabled woman and her residential care-giver.

Two college roomies.

Sisters sharing a house.

Grandpa and adult grandson on the farm.

If these are all going to be extrapolated and construed as part of the Triumphant, Conquering Gay Constituency --- you know what's next: O NOES! Under-served populations! Funding to match!

And worse, people can't share a house, an apartment, or even an unbrella anymore without somebody assuming they're sex partners.

It annoys me up to the eyeballs. It's making every kind of friendship and fellowship and partnership problematic, except for the gibberish alphabet group that starts out with LGBTQQI and ends with AIDS and STD.

1 posted on 09/29/2011 6:48:15 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Bingo!


2 posted on 09/29/2011 6:53:13 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Figures don’t lie but Liars figure.

All Commies lie.


3 posted on 09/29/2011 6:55:39 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

The numbers were originally overreported for no other reason than motives driven by ideology and political correctness.


4 posted on 09/29/2011 6:58:14 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Wow. Thats one whole h*ll of alot of whining & complaining coming from less than one half of one percent of the population.


5 posted on 09/29/2011 6:58:14 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; All

Don’t forget, these are the same folks who wanted to use “statistical sampling” in the census because it is supposedly MORE accurate than actual counting..


6 posted on 09/29/2011 6:59:06 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the EARTH...it's the ONLY planet with CHOCOLATE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
So given the margin of error, a fraction of a percent of the population is trying to foist their views and desires upon the rest of the population? This is a joke, right? If these statistics prove out, then same sex couples have relegated themselves to insignificance. If they don't like it, they'll get over it.
7 posted on 09/29/2011 7:01:31 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

And since gays can’t reproduce, theoretically, there will be no more gays in two generations....which tells us that GAY means soliciting kids...like the 14 year old that just killed himself.


8 posted on 09/29/2011 7:01:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil; SeekAndFind; Sacajaweau; the invisib1e hand; traditional1; Boardwalk; Albion Wilde; ..

It gets back to one simple question: How do they justify the questions they are asking? They are Constitutionally mandated to take an enumeration. That’s all. One question, one number. They are not mandated to try to guess who is sleeping with whom.


9 posted on 09/29/2011 7:01:43 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (" I never saw a more Spreading lot of Animals in my life, and in all the Wrong Places." - Eeyore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I answered the “race” question as HUMAN. To date, none of the pointed headed libs has approached me about that one, to their self preservation.


10 posted on 09/29/2011 7:04:58 AM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Agreed.


11 posted on 09/29/2011 7:06:01 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Politician and an amoeba.


12 posted on 09/29/2011 7:12:40 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Recently, two of my co-workers and I discovered that three other co-workers whom we’d assumed were gay, weren’t. We were kind of joking about it, “What’s the world coming to, all these straight single people with dogs,” but what it highlighted to us was that the gay community has indeed successfully convinced many of us that being gay is more pervasive than it is.


13 posted on 09/29/2011 7:15:28 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
And since gays can’t reproduce, theoretically, there will be no more gays in two generations....which tells us that GAY means soliciting kids...like the 14 year old that just killed himself.

Which is why they have to indoctrinate other peoples children into their vile, dysfunctional cult.
If you want to find the homosexuals - go to a place where there's children. You'll find them slithering around the kids.

“America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.”-- Joseph Stalin

14 posted on 09/29/2011 7:20:04 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

all oorect plus we have the more permisive attitudes of today which encourage gays to admit to their malady


15 posted on 09/29/2011 7:32:47 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“Households are identified as same-sex based on the sex of the responder and the relationship of the household members, as either unmarried partner or husband or wife, according to the Census Bureau.”

If two folks of the same sex get “married” in one state and then move or live in another state that doesn’t have impossibilities like “gay marriage”, how does the state want them to record that on the census? Or I guess that doesn’t matter, if they are married anywhere they are considered married?

Freegards


16 posted on 09/29/2011 7:34:50 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Well, it took a long time for the 10% number to be challenged as the percentage of gays in society. It is actually around 2-3%. I'm surprised they corrected this number so soon.

But, you are right. Are they just counting all people who live together and are of the same sex, homosexual? If so, the actual number would be even lower than the, now, corrected number.

17 posted on 09/29/2011 7:40:35 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo
all oorect plus we have the more permisive attitudes of today which encourage gays to admit to their malady

Political correctness was designed to silence (and intimidate) people from speaking out against left wing special interest groups and their agenda. As proof - name just one right wing group protected by political correctness. You can't. There isn't one.

American institutions who do not obey these rules will be financially destroyed by ACLU lawyers (who are funded by those who wish to destroy America from within) in the courts.

Americans are by no way tolerant of homosexuals. They believe their free will has been stolen from them (hate speech litigation), but they still have their right to speak freely. So, speak up now, or forever hold your tongue!

18 posted on 09/29/2011 7:43:08 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Here´s another set of estimates. Here´s another. And this set. Here´s another one. And another here. Here´s one. How about this one?....


19 posted on 09/29/2011 7:44:10 AM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Bullshit.

A pair of buddies decide to claim their "gay" with another male, rent an apartment or buy a house, and can gain benefits for the un-insured one, protection for themselves in case of being laid off, fired, etc., and have women regularly in for partyin'.

Gaming the system using political-correctness to gain benefits.

20 posted on 09/29/2011 7:45:28 AM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“But you guys can’t continue to oppose gay marriage, cause the country is now 73% gay, see?”

Whatta bunch of maroons!


21 posted on 09/29/2011 7:47:03 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz
Well, it took a long time for the 10% number to be challenged as the percentage of gays in society. It is actually around 2-3%. I'm surprised they corrected this number so soon.

It's less than that. The pro-homo organizations count the people in prisons who don't have a gender choice if they decide they want sex. Therefore, men who have sex with other men in prison are automatically "homosexual", which isn't the case. They don't have a choice.
There are a lot of people in prison these days, so the numbers are skewed.

22 posted on 09/29/2011 7:52:46 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I have to wonder what other numbers they fudged in the lefts favor. This makes me question if the entire 2010 census results are even close to being accurate.


23 posted on 09/29/2011 7:53:24 AM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

This is the same crap they pulled with the Pentagons DADT survey. They cooked the numbers!


24 posted on 09/29/2011 7:55:32 AM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

For at least 40 years it has been known that the 10% figure was way too high...but it keeps getting repeated in the media so people keep getting fooled into thinking it is correct.


25 posted on 09/29/2011 7:59:02 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lwd
I have to wonder what other numbers they fudged in the lefts favor.

To them, there's no difference between the truly needy and the lazy (the wanting) who simply don't feel like getting out of bed 29 days a month (The first day of the month is pay day, so they do manage to roll over and fall out of bed on the 1st).

26 posted on 09/29/2011 8:02:02 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lwd

hehehehe you said "fudged"

27 posted on 09/29/2011 8:04:34 AM PDT by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

So, speak up now, or forever hold your tongue

**********************************************************

Oh, I do, I do and much to my wife’s chagrin. But being married 47 years means she knows I’m not about to change.


28 posted on 09/29/2011 8:05:08 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
where entering a person’s sex often did not accurately reflect that person’s gender. Often??? horse hockey!

Boxes on the Census form for "male" and "female" were stacked on top of each other, making it more likely for a person to mark the wrong gender or make erroneous lines, changing the results. nonsense!!!

29 posted on 09/29/2011 8:08:12 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (So much stress was put on Bush's Fault that it finally let go, magnitude 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lwd
This is the same crap they pulled with the Pentagons DADT survey. They cooked the numbers!

They surveyed people behind a desk. No one bothered to ask those with boots on the ground - those who would be forced to deal with the disgusting orgies later.

30 posted on 09/29/2011 8:09:57 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

That was “project 10”, under the general technique called “jamming”, which operates by making the occurrence of homosexuality to be far more ubiquitous than it is.

It is funny when someone awkwardly handles this technique, like when my libinlaw interjected this “statistic” in a complete non-sequitur to the conversation. My wife and I looked at her and said “that’s not true, and what did it have to do with slicing the cake?”


31 posted on 09/29/2011 8:11:42 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Who put the preasure on them that forced them to come clean?


32 posted on 09/29/2011 8:16:08 AM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Where else but in Amerika can we have such a small vocal minority of PERVERTS wreaking havoc with civil liberties and ripping off the taxpayers for extra funding against their sicknesses?

in the past, they were hidden from view. Oh, for the good old days!

33 posted on 09/29/2011 8:33:18 AM PDT by WVKayaker (The GOP needs to live the planks of its platform, not just offer lip service. -Sarah Palin 8/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

What else did they LIE to us about?

Hmmmmmmm???????


34 posted on 09/29/2011 8:47:32 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

If an alien from another universe visited and watched network TV, they would conclude that about 50% of the population is gay.....


35 posted on 09/29/2011 8:58:20 AM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Excellent question. Keep ypour ears perked and your eyes peeled.


36 posted on 09/29/2011 9:28:03 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Half the lies they tell about me ain't true." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

They are the spearhead in the movement to criminalize Christianity.


37 posted on 09/29/2011 9:30:01 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Gee you know perhaps when you want to lie about something someone should at least check into how many marriages there are in the USA before proceeding? Just a thought.....I swear this administration is run by a bunch of children who act first then everything blows up in their faces.


38 posted on 09/29/2011 9:59:40 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
How do you starve a democrat?

Hide their food stamps under their work boots!

39 posted on 09/29/2011 10:26:00 AM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

LOL... I thought about that when I typed it (unfortunately).


40 posted on 09/29/2011 10:28:11 AM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I answered the “race” question as HUMAN. To date, none of the pointed headed libs has approached me about that one, to their self preservation.

They came out in person to interview me because I gave the same answer. I told the Census representative (truthfully) that (1) if he tried to guess my race by appearance, he would get it wrong, and (2) if he did that, I would find out and look for a way to sue him for everything from his toenails up. He left my race marked as HUMAN.

41 posted on 09/29/2011 11:42:45 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; BabaOreally; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

The Census people have no business serving the homosexual agenda. Of course they are no doubt larded with homosexuals bending the mission of the Census to serve the homo-agenda, as it seems every government agency/department/bureau has now. I'm sure the number they now admit is likewise artificially inflated.

42 posted on 09/29/2011 2:56:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Just goes to prove that there are lies, damned lies and statistics.

I’ve taken care of a lot of patients in “same sex households.” Most of them were not sexual partners.


43 posted on 09/29/2011 3:01:17 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.org Have mustard seed: will use it. To control the border, Patrol the border!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lwd

DADT What a farce that was.

There was no proper survey, and the numbers were cooked, 99% of marines and soldiers do not want openly serving queers but hey the left has to try and change the numbers but even worse is now the homo’s are wanting cross dressers to serve openly

THIS IS TOTAL B/S

For any lib on here who thinks this homo agenda is not a problem or just about marriage then WAKE THE HELL UP YOU FOOLS


44 posted on 09/29/2011 3:05:37 PM PDT by manc (Hannity the fraud he admitted he's socially liberal he's no conservative marriage=1man+ 1 woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

first thing they need to do when we get power is to overturn all of this queer crap


45 posted on 09/29/2011 3:07:09 PM PDT by manc (Hannity the fraud he admitted he's socially liberal he's no conservative marriage=1man+ 1 woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

This is outrageous.


46 posted on 09/29/2011 3:08:37 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

which is why the first thing the president does once in power is to say no survey was done in a proper way, no investigations were done, I’ve had complaints of officers, Generals to the average marine and we will not be letting openly serving homosexuals or cross dressers serve now.
There will be no more lawsuits from past or present homosexuals

I’[d go further and tell them they need mental help


47 posted on 09/29/2011 3:14:50 PM PDT by manc (Hannity the fraud he admitted he's socially liberal he's no conservative marriage=1man+ 1 woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

All right, is there some bureau out there that doesn’t have an honesty problem, the weather service, perhaps? Or how about NASA and it’s space toys? Come on, I am disappointed for the institution that is supposed to provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty, to be having an issue with getting their information straight, not just on these matters, but on information in general.


48 posted on 09/29/2011 8:39:29 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson