Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/30/2011 10:11:29 AM PDT by BradtotheBone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: BradtotheBone

This is racist.


2 posted on 09/30/2011 10:12:45 AM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (According to the MSM, I'm a fringe sitting, pajama wearing, Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

As long as Elena Kagan recuses herself first.


3 posted on 09/30/2011 10:13:39 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Obama/Democrats trying to pull an FDR? Trying to stack the Supreme Court in his favor....


4 posted on 09/30/2011 10:16:00 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

They don’t want a probe. They already made up their minds they want him off this issue. The only probe they want is to find a way to remove him from this case.


6 posted on 09/30/2011 10:16:41 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

LOL, Ha, Ha, Ha.

Another attempt of a high tech lynching of a Black man by liberal democrats.


7 posted on 09/30/2011 10:16:47 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Of course they do BUT Kagan does not present a problem right? Give me a break...

Justice Thomas no one can MAKE you recuse yourself, NO ONE. Kagan would never recuse herself so please, for the sake of our country, DO NOT COWER to these people.

Thank you Sir.


9 posted on 09/30/2011 10:17:16 AM PDT by bbernard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

tell these DemocRATS to go pound sand


12 posted on 09/30/2011 10:19:35 AM PDT by el_texicano (Extremism in the face of tyranny is no fault, Moderation in the face of evil, no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

The ‘RATS are a bunch of racist pigs. Still going after Justice Thomas. The smartest man on the court, IMHO.


17 posted on 09/30/2011 10:22:58 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Too much "education" can destroy your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Thomas knows these vermin for what they are.
They will have to shoot him.


19 posted on 09/30/2011 10:25:09 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

I want them to investigate Keegan she should not be involved in this ruling because she does have a conflict of interest in it!


22 posted on 09/30/2011 10:29:28 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Please don’t throw me into the Briar Patch Briar Crat!

Pray for America


23 posted on 09/30/2011 10:31:18 AM PDT by bray (Sarah is hated by the establishment of both Parties. Winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

:: The lawmakers on Thursday asked the U.S. Judicial Conference to formally request that the Department of Justice look into Thomas’s failure to disclose hundreds of thousands of dollars ::

Too easy.

The lawmakers on Thursday asked the Inspector General’s Office to formally request an inquiry of the Department of Justice regarding failure to disclose hundreds of thousands of illegal purchased weapons that were allowed to move to Mexico.


24 posted on 09/30/2011 10:31:59 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Who didn’t see that coming?
So Charlie Rangel’s tax evasion is o.k. but Clarence Thomas failure (for whatever reason) to disclose is not?
I say we stoop down to their level and give CT a ‘rangel’.


26 posted on 09/30/2011 10:36:19 AM PDT by griswold3 (Character is Destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
Hysterical. Speaker Boehner, please pick up the white phone in the lobby.

You should be able to gather at least 240 signatures to probe Zer0's former Solicitor General Kagan too (and while you're at it, throw in the wide Latina also).

28 posted on 09/30/2011 10:41:23 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
I'd like to know why Thomas didn't disclose. Perhaps he was not required to.....but I'd like to hear about his reason.

Or does my asking make me a RINO?

Leni

29 posted on 09/30/2011 10:41:23 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Too Bad Those of Us who Work for a Living Have to Support Those who Vote for a Living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

the left hates (honest) blacks. the left is color blind to slacking, scammers.


30 posted on 09/30/2011 10:46:16 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Liberal high tech hanging / witch hunt !


31 posted on 09/30/2011 10:46:18 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
Did someone say our elected congress critters were low in IQ? I might be missing something but here is what is included in the report by law mentioned regarding gifts:

§ 102. Contents of reports

(A) The identity of the source, a brief description, and the value of all gifts aggregating more than the minimal value as established by section 7342 (a)(5) of title 5, United States Code, or $250, whichever is greater, received from any source other than a relative of the reporting individual during the preceding calendar year, except that any food, lodging, or entertainment received as personal hospitality of an individual need not be reported, and any gift with a fair market value of $100 or less, as adjusted at the same time and by the same percentage as the minimal value is adjusted, need not be aggregated for purposes of this subparagraph.

The definitions section includes a wife as a relative: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05a/usc_sup_05_5_10_sq3_20_I.html

Can someone with a legal background shed some light?

32 posted on 09/30/2011 10:47:02 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Like we couldn’t see this coming.

But I bet none of these commie pinkos are asking Kagan to recuse herself...


35 posted on 09/30/2011 10:50:51 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

O.K.

Then lets investigate that ugly witch Ruth Bader-Ginsberg, that other witch Soda-Jerk, The other witch Kagan and that guy with the irrational grin on his puss, Breyer.

PLUS all their respective spouses, cousins, room-mates, etc.

THis is just more hard-ball Chicago Gangland tactics by the Chief Thug Obama and his cronies.

The GOP should counter with a special prosecutor to investigate Solyndra, Fast and Furious, Light Squared and the Gibson Guitar caper.

We need street fighters and who do we have??? Boner and
McConnell.

Pathetic.


37 posted on 09/30/2011 10:52:32 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP Obama in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson