Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANOTHER satellite to crash land soon, and the odds of it hitting someone are even higher
DailyMail.co.uk ^ | 9/30/11 | Ted Thornhill

Posted on 10/01/2011 1:29:05 PM PDT by Evil Slayer

The world was gripped by the Nasa UARS satellite that fell back to Earth last Saturday – and now there’s another that’s plummeting back from orbit.

In late October or early November a Germany astronomy satellite – called ROSAT- will plunge uncontrolled back to Earth.

While slightly smaller than UARS, the German satellite is expected to have more pieces survive re-entry. The German space agency estimated that it has a 1-in-2000 chance of hitting someone - higher than the 1-in-3,200 odds NASA gave for UARS.

The German ROSAT satellite was launched in 1990, 'died' in 1998 and weighs two and a half tonnes.

The German space agency estimates that 30 pieces weighing less than two tons will survive re-entry. Debris may include sharp mirror shards.

The German space agency puts the odds of somebody somewhere on Earth being hurt by its satellite at 1-in-2,000 — a slightly higher level of risk than was calculated for the Nasa satellite.

Again, it seems certain that information on when - or where - the satellite might land will be scant.

But any one individual's odds of being struck are 1-in-14trillion.

Heiner Klinkrad, head of the Space Debris Office at the European Space Agency, said in a webcast posted on the German Aerospace Center's website: ‘It is not possible to accurately predict ROSAT's re-entry.

‘The uncertainty will decrease as the moment of re-entry approaches. It will not be possible to make any kind of reliable forecast about where the satellite will actually come down until about one or two hours before the fact.’

Experts believe that two dozen metal pieces from the bus-sized Nasa satellite fell over a 500-mile span in the Pacific Ocean.

It began hitting the water southwest of Christmas Island.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: astronomysatellite; germansatellite; rosat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2011 1:29:11 PM PDT by Evil Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

2 posted on 10/01/2011 1:32:49 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

3 posted on 10/01/2011 1:35:56 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

4 posted on 10/01/2011 1:38:08 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

the Germans just build stuff better...that’s why more pieces will survive reentry.


5 posted on 10/01/2011 1:42:06 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Did the satellite originally have some self-maneuvering capability? If so, why not leave some juice available to bring it down with a modicum of control?

There will always be comm problems and things like that, but the satellite end of life and deorbit should also be part of the design.

Just an old country boy that is still amazed at what we do in space. /smile

6 posted on 10/01/2011 1:48:47 PM PDT by ken in texas (Can't Afford a Tagline... send money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Ach du lieber!!!


7 posted on 10/01/2011 1:50:45 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
The German space agency puts the odds of somebody somewhere on Earth being hurt by its satellite at 1-in-2,000... But any one individual's odds of being struck are 1-in-14trillion.

Do these numbers seem incompatibly to anyone else?

8 posted on 10/01/2011 1:51:48 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken in texas
I'm surprised the government hasn't required that on all space bound vehicles. Sort of like the seat belt requirement law.
9 posted on 10/01/2011 1:52:24 PM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

7 billion in world times 2000 = 14 trillion.


10 posted on 10/01/2011 1:55:49 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken in texas

Message to Ted Thornhill: If an event is more likely to happen, THE ODDS ARE LOWER.....

Less likely to occur, ODDS ARE HIGHER........

Stay away from Vegas, Teddy Boy!


11 posted on 10/01/2011 1:56:12 PM PDT by outhousepatrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ken in texas
There will always be comm problems and things like that, but the satellite end of life and deorbit should also be part of the design.

That is true for newer satellites. This must be an older one.

12 posted on 10/01/2011 1:57:06 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I like both Perry and Palin, and will vote for whichever of them wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Not again!
13 posted on 10/01/2011 2:00:37 PM PDT by luigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory

good point..


14 posted on 10/01/2011 2:06:33 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

“Ach du lieber!!!”

Ist das nicht ein Satellit?

Ja! Das ist ein Satellit!”


15 posted on 10/01/2011 2:12:44 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa; GOPJ

Actually, it’s probably more complicated than that, because there’s no reason that just one person is hit, in that one in 2,000 chance event.

Just to illustrate what I mean, suppose that the odds of a second person being hit, at the same time, are 1 in 5. That would increase the chance of any particular individual being hit, by about 20% — to about one in 11.2 trillion. There is also some (small) chance that a chunk would take out (say) an airliner — thus further increasing the chance of an individual getting killed by the debris (even if not directly hit).


16 posted on 10/01/2011 2:12:51 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
That is true for newer satellites. This must be an older one.

Thanks for the info update. I was a lot younger when Sputnik was launched. At that time I suspect very few people expected that what we now have in orbit could become a reality.

17 posted on 10/01/2011 2:14:53 PM PDT by ken in texas (Can't Afford a Tagline... send money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I agree that the odds seem to be based on an even distribution of population when we are in fact clustered. So that if one person is hit its likely that others would be hit.

However, if the number was adjusted to for clusters the chances of one person getting hit would be lower but the chances of multiple people getting hit from one debris would increase. I’m not enough of a math person to say the corrections would make the odds the same but my instincts tell me they would be near enough that the correct answer would be materially the same.


18 posted on 10/01/2011 2:22:45 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The world was gripped??

I wasn’t gripped.

Was anone else gripped? Did anyone go to their basment?


19 posted on 10/01/2011 2:23:11 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The picture of the satellite in post #1 makes it look like an air conditioning unit with wings and a jet engine.


20 posted on 10/01/2011 3:29:09 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson