Typical that creationists are unable to argue against a scientific theory without making an argument against atheism - while being too ignorant to recognize the difference.
amd: Typical that creationists are unable to argue against a scientific theory without making an argument against atheism - while being too ignorant to recognize the difference.
Spirited: First of all, evolutionism is in fact atheism with respect to the living, transcendent Creator Who spoke. It is not however atheistic with respect to Chaos, the “first substance in existence” out of which the sun-god Ra for instance, created himself, according to post-flood Sumerian and Egyptian creation mythos. Modern evolutionists merely renamed Chaos, ie., “spontaneous generation” of something from nothing and Big Bang, which amounts to the same thing, that is, life comes from death and order from disorder.
Evolution is merely the mechanical mechanism by which life somehow emerged from death...Chaos, spontaneous generation, Big Bang.
From the beginning it has been a paradox and this hasn’t changed. For example, Darwinian materialism nihilizes man’s soul/mind, thereby reducing man created in the spiritual likeness of God the Father to an emergent product of mindless matter. Man is nothing more than an ex-ape whose “thoughts” are the chance movement of chemicals. “Thinking chemicals,” in other words. If this utter stupidity is nevertheless true, then why ought creationists take evolutionists seriously?