Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS News Reporter Says White House Screamed, Swore at Her Over Fast and Furious
The Weekly Standard ^ | 10/4/11 | MARK HEMINGWAY

Posted on 10/04/2011 11:06:38 AM PDT by Nachum

The Fast and Furious scandal, in which the Justice Department knowingly gave Mexican criminal gangs thousands of guns, just keeps escalating. The latest development centers around whether or not Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress about having knowledge of the controversial gun trafficking operation. Recently released documents say Holder was briefed about the operation long before he told the Judiciary Committee he was first aware of what was going on. (Holder now claims he misunderstood the question was being asked.)

What's more, CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson -- who's been covering the scandal from the beginning -- says in an interview on the Laura Ingraham Show today that the White House and Justice Department have taken to screaming at her for reporting on the story. You can listen to the full interview below, but here are the key excerpts from Attkisson:

In between the yelling that I received from Justice Department yesterday, the spokeswoman--who would not put anything in writing, I was asking for her explanation so there would be clarity and no confusion later over what had been said, she wouldn't put anything in writing--so we talked on the phone and she said things such as the question Holder answered was different than the one he asked. But he phrased it, he said very explicitly, 'I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks.'

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuseofpress; alfrankenhandler; attkisson; banglist; bhofascism; cbs; corruption; cussingwhitehouse; democrats; ericschultz; fastandfurious; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; impeach; liberalfascism; news; obama; reporter; schultz; sharylattkisson; struckanerve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last
To: KansasGirl

“[The White House and Justice Department] will tell you that I’m the only reporter—as they told me—that is not reasonable. They say the Washington Post is reasonable, the LA Times is reasonable, the New York Times is reasonable, I’m the only one who thinks this is a story, and they think I’m unfair and biased by pursuing it.”


41 posted on 10/04/2011 11:23:59 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Sheesh! Doesn’t this woman know about the MSM’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy?

Don’t ask questions, don’t tell the truth.


42 posted on 10/04/2011 11:24:56 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I just sent this to Drudge and hope he puts it up.


43 posted on 10/04/2011 11:25:31 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

bump for later!


44 posted on 10/04/2011 11:25:41 AM PDT by sneakers (EAT YOUR PEAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I think I could accomodate the first case for this PBP. :-)


45 posted on 10/04/2011 11:25:41 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dead

If you were the White House and had Stick and the Wookie makin’ Whoopie inside you, wouldn’t you scream?


46 posted on 10/04/2011 11:25:49 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dead

Exactly, the “White House” didn’t scream and swear at the reporter,

a specific person in the 0bama administration screamed and swore at her.

Who was it, chickie?


47 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:01 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reagandemocrat

I think Ed Schultz has a sub-penis (an inch more, he’d be a King; an inch less, he’d be a queen).


48 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:08 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier currently deployed in the Valley of Death, Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Somebody’s headed for a Pulitzer.......”

SILLY CONSERVATIVE...
Don’t you know they only give Pulitzer’s to reporters who destroy REPUBLICANS?


49 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:21 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Sharyl Attkisson -- who's been covering the scandal from the beginning

They must have thought her name was Asskissin, not Attkisson...........

50 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Or a park bench.


51 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:33 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Izzy Dunne

Yeah, Sharyl Attkisson was with CNN for years, back in the early 1990s. I think she used to host the morning show there before moving over the CBS. She was somewhat less liberal than her colleagues and I always liked her.


52 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:49 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

do we get to play “watch this, hold muh beer”?

LOL


53 posted on 10/04/2011 11:26:57 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
[The White House and Justice Department] will tell you that I'm the only reporter--as they told me--that is not reasonable. They say the Washington Post is reasonable, the LA Times is reasonable, the New York Times is reasonable, I'm the only one who thinks this is a story, and they think I'm unfair and biased by pursuing it.

"Reasonable" apparently means covering up not merely potential White House knowledge of, but actual participation in a series of felonies including murder. That is what the Washington Post, the NY Times, and the LA Times consider "reasonable". Apparently decades-old spraypaint on a rock in Texas is more important than the killing of a Border Patrol officer in Arizona by a firearm that the ATF deliberately placed in criminal hands. Props to CBS, disgust toward the rest.

54 posted on 10/04/2011 11:27:29 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

“Her job is to lick Obama and keep him clean and shinning...”

Do you realize the image you just projected????
Have a heart already. Geeze


55 posted on 10/04/2011 11:27:29 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
And a beer/i>

Mmmmmm Beer!

56 posted on 10/04/2011 11:27:45 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
It's quite simple:

In 2009 the Obama administration, in an effort to jump-start anti-gun sentiment and bring about new and 'better' anti-gun legislation, claimed that 90% of all guns confiscated from drug cartels in Mexico originated in the United States, most of them having been obtained from gun stores in States bordering Mexico.

This claim was demonstrably false.

So, since it is well known that Barack Obama is never wrong about anything, persons in his administration set about trying to make the 90% figure true.

57 posted on 10/04/2011 11:28:01 AM PDT by WayneS (Comments now include 25% MORE sarcasm for NO additional charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
From the article:

[The White House and Justice Department] will tell you that I'm the only reporter--as they told me--that is not reasonable. They say the Washington Post is reasonable, the LA Times is reasonable, the New York Times is reasonable, I'm the only one who thinks this is a story, and they think I'm unfair and biased by pursuing it.

IOW, roll over and play dead, like a good little girl........

58 posted on 10/04/2011 11:28:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reagandemocrat

I misread that as Ed Schultz, but the comment still applies.


59 posted on 10/04/2011 11:28:47 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier currently deployed in the Valley of Death, Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Don’t worry, the MSM will likely back off. They love the guy.
____________________________________________________________

But, Congressman Issa and the Pubbies in the House will NOT back off. This thing will come to the point that the media will not be able to ignore it.


60 posted on 10/04/2011 11:28:53 AM PDT by no dems (The HERMANator in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson