And your post is another education right there.
I was partly facetious with the “Muslim is rhetorical” comment, i.e., NOT that “Muslim” should be eliminated, but that “Muslim” falls under your category of “every radical-backed syndicate.”
In many, many more words I have been posting that the main purpose of F & F, IMO, is to destabilize Mexico and bordering US states; disarming US is a big, but secondary motive.
The BHO administration ALWAYS aims to kill as many birds as possible with one stone.
See how many words I just used right there. That’s the best I can do with “pithy.” lol
I wasn’t disagreeing with you at all, and probably should not have replied, but I am glad I did because it provoked you to post important information.
The Muslim threat is at least one of the most under-estimated threats facing us today, which is why BHO has spent so much effort training the media, federal bureaucracies, military, institutions, NGOs, religious organizations, etc, etc, that there is only one way to view Muslims-—and that’s the proscribed PC way. Anything else is Islamophobic.
“Pithy” was certainly a compliment. I need to practice “pithy.”
I appreciate your insight and am glad you replied.
IMO, destabilizing Mexico and our Southwest, giving super status to Islam, the refusal of the Republican party to take a united stand against the socialization of our Nation and the deconstruction of our Constitution are all leading to the formation of the North American Union, a super state of the one world government.
For most Americans, not being able to see the forest for the trees is made more difficult when additional trees are being planted as we sleep.
A rather boring summation of my concerns but I can’t be pithy all the time. ;^)