Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CitizenUSA

This case is NOT about what a person has the right to eat, but what a person has the right to sell. Please don’t read WND & think you are getting an honest report.

This is a summary judgment. That means the facts in the case are in dispute, and must therefor go to trial. The plaintiffs argue they are not selling raw milk. The state says they are, and have denied them a business license. The facts are in dispute, so it needs to go to trial.

That is all this ruling says.


39 posted on 10/06/2011 6:13:07 AM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

Here is the fix for “legislate from the bench” judges:

1. Tree
2. Rope
3. Assembly required
4. Repeat
5. Problem solved


40 posted on 10/06/2011 6:17:30 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Nice try.
Speak louder next time.
56 posted on 10/06/2011 7:08:52 AM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson