Some of my prior snarky posts:
Palin’s self-imposed deadline looms
Thursday, September 29, 2011 1:38:54 PM · 6 of 49
Reagan69 to Blood of Tyrants
She’ll run. After all the effort and prep she’d done, of course she will.
She is playing a game of chicken with the GOP. Not only will she have to battle the Dems, she’s got an immediate battle with the establishment GOP on her hands.
They are going to hand us Mitt Romney, just like they did McCain, come hellp or high water... and whether we likeit or not.
Sarah Palin Has Until Late December to Jump In, and Still Win
Monday, September 26, 2011 6:51:59 AM · 131 of 157
Reagan69 to Freepmanchew
I’m one of those obnoxious Palinista’s but this article is just stupid.
The author lists the dates of the primarys in each state but fails to mention that there are legal deadlines for filing to get your name on the ballot.
The first is Utah’s = October 14th.
Giving Up on Bachmann
Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:16:41 AM · 12 of 166
Reagan69 to freespirited
Give Sarah a chance !
Palin Defends Perry on Social Security
Monday, September 12, 2011 11:40:39 AM · 48 of 63
Reagan69 to Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Sarah Palin is running. If any of you are thinking she will be ensorsing Perry, you best find your Plan-B.
CRONY CAPITALISM - THY NAME IS RICK PERRY !
For a few.
I finally came to the conclusion last night that I’d been “had” along with many other Palin supporters.
Sorry. Didn’t mean to be unpleasant. I just didn’t scroll down far enough through the comments.
I wouldn’t let yourself get too hurt by this. She’s still the best candidate out there, but if she’s decided not to run, then she’s decided not to run. At least, not unless things change again. We’ll have to see what happens next.
But I don’t really see an alternative candidate of her caliber. I like Cain, but I don’t really know what he would do in political office other than what he’s told us, which I’ve learned to be leary of. And he seems to be about the best one left standing.
Where's the evidence for that conclusion (that you've been "had")?
You had the same info to evaluate as did the authors whose opposite conclusions you called stupid.
You had people vigorously arguing with you that Palin would not run and you concluded she would.
You didn't call it right. So what? You weren't "had" by anyone. You simply thought what you thought for whatever reason and you were wrong. Other people looked at the same info and thought what they thought and they were right. That is all.
Don't blame it someone else. You reached your own conclusions just like everybody else.