Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Thank God Is RIGHT" Scott Brown Sitting Pretty Vs. Warren
Boston Herald ^ | October 7, 2011 | Michael Graham

Posted on 10/07/2011 6:58:28 AM PDT by suspects

“Thank God” is right.

Finally the Massachusetts Senate race is starting to get interesting. No, not the primary — that’s over and done. Obedient Massachusetts Democrats will do as they’re told and nominate the party bosses’ pick, Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren.

I’m talking about the battle royale, Scott Brown vs. Elizabeth Warren which has turned, literally, into a “beauty contest.”

It began at Tuesday night’s Boston Herald debate when Warren was asked how she paid for college. In reference to Brown posing for Cosmo, Warren quipped, “I kept my clothes on.”

Gales of hearty liberal laughter ensued.

Then, yesterday morning, the gang at WZLX asked Brown if he had “officially responded to Warren’s comment about how she didn’t take her clothes off?”

“Thank God,” Brown quipped back, once again to laughter.

And in less time than it takes a neutrino to break the speed of light, the Massachusetts Liberal Outrage-O-Matic was cranked up and powered into action.

“Sen. Brown’s comments are the kind of thing you would expect to hear in a frat house, not a race for U.S. Senate,” sniffed Clare Kelly, executive director of the Massachusetts Democratic Party.

“Ridiculously ignorant, rude, sexist, and false” whined another state party official.

I predict that, by the time you read this in the Herald, at least one nitwit from the National Organization for Women will have demanded Brown withdraw from the race. Or, at the least, send more candid snaps from his Cosmo spread.

Sorry, ladies. You’re going to be disappointed on all counts.

So far, Brown has declined to apologize, and I would be surprised if he ever does. In part because he has done nothing wrong, and in part because he...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: brown; cosmo; elizabethwarren; naked; nude; scottbrown; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 10/07/2011 6:58:32 AM PDT by suspects
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: suspects

How bad is Massachusetts? Scott Brown is considered “right-wing” there.

2 posted on 10/07/2011 7:00:03 AM PDT by Grunthor (Heartless Bigot for Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

a truckload of manufactured outrage, but even so, Sen. Brown has proven he’s basically a dolt.

3 posted on 10/07/2011 7:00:23 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

It is a crying shame that the people of Massachusetts seem to be incapable of putting a REAL Conservative into office.

Brown is a full blown RINO and that’s the best that they can do?

4 posted on 10/07/2011 7:01:29 AM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November (2012) from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

pretty funny, actually

Brown actually makes a Churchill-worthy comment

5 posted on 10/07/2011 7:01:44 AM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

“Ridiculously ignorant, rude, sexist, and false” whined another state party official.

False? Really?

6 posted on 10/07/2011 7:02:04 AM PDT by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

Lady Nancy Astor: “Winston, if you were my husband, I’d poison your tea.”

Churchill: “Nancy, if I were your husband, I’d drink it.”

Ridiculously sexist rude and false!
and LOL!

7 posted on 10/07/2011 7:05:15 AM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

The person is probably an atheist...

8 posted on 10/07/2011 7:05:50 AM PDT by WayneS (Comments now include 25% more sarcasm at NO additional charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: suspects
Elizabeth Warren is the democrats new “dream candidate”. The loony left is actually claiming Elizabeth Warren is going to win the Senate seat in a landslide and be their candidate for president in 2016. I guess Obama wasn't Marxist enough so they want a full blown unapologetic revolutionary Marxist in Comrade Warren.
9 posted on 10/07/2011 7:07:25 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
As a pol, [Warren]’s more of the “screamer” type, yelling at business owners about how they didn’t succeed on their own, or shouting about how much we need higher taxes.

She's an economic idiot, so she should fit right in with the rest of the gang in DC. I still don't understand, however, why the GOP doesn't nail these SOB's when they start complaining we need taxes on the rich because they "don't pay their fair share". Absolutely correct: The top 10% of the people foot almost 70% of the tax bill. So if you by into this level-the-playing-field BS, the rich should have their taxes cut while the 50% who pay no taxes should have theirs raised. As far as I'm concerned, if you have nothing in the game (i.e., don't pay taxes), you don't get to vote. Man, just think how that would change the dynamics!

10 posted on 10/07/2011 7:08:38 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

They won’t vote much different,probably

11 posted on 10/07/2011 7:09:15 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects


What a great comeback...she really opened herself up on that one. She’s a commie hag and when she didn’t get confirmed for the new commie consumer branch of goverment, she decided to go this route. Hope Brown beats the crap out of her (in the race of course)

12 posted on 10/07/2011 7:10:35 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Pro-Life, Pro-2nd Amendment, Pro-Israel, Pro-Free Market, Pro-Low Taxes,..Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

Here we go again. Brown is a RINO. So what. Name a credible 100% conservative who can win in MA. You can’t because there aren’t any. We can moan and cry about that all day but it doesn’t change the fact that its better to have Brown in the Senate than some nasty Lib shrew like Elizabeth Warren. She is smart, arrogant and will start working with other Libs to pass laws that will make our lives a living Hell. And you’ll have to see her smug face on TV every night as the MSM plays her up. I don’t care how much of a RINO Brown is. I want him to win. I may not send him money but I want him to win to keep this harpy out of the Senate.

13 posted on 10/07/2011 7:12:40 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I’ve heard somebody say that just as we shouldn’t have taxation without representation, we shouldn’t have representation without taxation.

And yes, that would REALLY change American politics. It would be a fatal blow to Cloward-Piven.

14 posted on 10/07/2011 7:13:16 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Why? Because he responded to what was obviously a set up? Warren’s answer to the question was scripted and dealt to her by a compliant questioner. I thought his response was humorous. Let the lefties squeal.

15 posted on 10/07/2011 7:14:57 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
My favorite lecture to freshmen econ students was how I could end poverty overnight. I'd make that claim and they would ask “How?”. At the time, a family of 4 with income of $9600 or less (it's been a while) were considered poor. So, I told my students all you have to do is gather up everyone who makes $9600 or less and shoot them. After the student recovered, I asked them how many days would it take before the guy making $9601 started bitching that he was the poorest person in the country. We then went on to discuss the fact that, as long as two people can have different incomes, someone is going to be PO’ed. The War on Poverty was doomed from the start and a gov’t publication brought out this past summer shows that, despite trillions of dollars spent to address the problem, poverty is worse now that it was when Johnson started the WoP program. Despite all of these failures, the poor still align with the Democrats. How damn dumb can you be?
16 posted on 10/07/2011 7:26:21 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: saganite

If Brown wins reelection, as he should, he will have several years to be him self before he has to move a little to the left to win another election.

17 posted on 10/07/2011 7:30:46 AM PDT by WellyP (REAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Thank you, well said. These blow hards have never lived in (M)assachusetts and do not know the political dynamic in this state. It is virtually impossible for a true conservative to win in this state except for in the central part where I live. That said we are starting to see improvements at the state wide level and until we can take back the legislature and Senate at the state level the federal level won’t improve either. We had high hopes for the House Reps in the 2010 election and all the GOP candidates were defeated. All we can do is keep trying.

And if you don’t like (M)assachusetts, please, stay the hell away from it and leave us alone. THANKS!

18 posted on 10/07/2011 7:36:13 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Are there any real Conservatives in Massachusetts?

19 posted on 10/07/2011 7:37:40 AM PDT by JakeS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JakeS

Yea, but they stay out of politics.

20 posted on 10/07/2011 7:40:59 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson