Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Democrats Eyeing 401(k)s, IRAs for Tax Hit?
IBD Editorials ^ | October 12, 2011 | JOHN MERLINE

Posted on 10/12/2011 4:26:54 PM PDT by Kaslin

s your 401(k) safe from the tax man? That's a question that might be worth asking, as the congressional "supercommittee" scrambles to find $1.5 trillion in additional deficit cuts.

In September, the Senate Finance Committee held a little-noticed hearing that explored changes to retirement plans — principally employer-sponsored 401(k)s — that would in one way or another cut their tax deductions.

The tax breaks' size makes them a tempting target for lawmakers. According to the White House budget office, tax exemptions for 401(k)s and IRAs will "cost" the government more than $436 billion over the next five years.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., complained that "in spite of the tremendous tax preferences," Americans aren't saving nearly enough for retirement.

Critics say the existing system benefits mostly the rich. The liberal-leaning Tax Policy Center calculates that 80% of these tax "expenditures" go to the top 20% of earners. Such people "would almost certainly save for retirement even without tax incentives," said Karen Friedman, policy director at the Pension Rights Center.

But Judy Miller of the American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries argues that the deduction's cost is wildly exaggerated. Adjust for the taxes paid when retirees withdraw money and the cost is cut in half.

And, she says, the break is more progressive than some allege. Among other things, high earners who get a bigger tax break going in end up paying more in taxes when they take the money out.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 401k; rat; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Kaslin

One huge problem with that approach is that many companies have abandoned defined benefit pension plans in favor of 401(K) plans, with limited company participation—matching up to 6%, for instance. If that happens, many more people will end up without any retirement except for the failed Social Security System.


21 posted on 10/12/2011 4:50:33 PM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Zerobama's bus tour: the Blunder Bus Tour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

The Wells Fargo/Wachovia merger, and the Bank of America/Merrill Lynch merger both were announced before the election in 2008.


22 posted on 10/12/2011 4:51:52 PM PDT by Katherine Ann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The point is not the cost to government,. That’s just the excuse. What this is really about is the fact that this is a huge pool of money that the government wants to get its hands on. It’s for the children, you know.


23 posted on 10/12/2011 4:52:34 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
So long term, it doesn’t “cost” the government any tax revenue, because the taxes are paid on the back end, not year by year.

Any of your money that you don't give to the government, the government considers as a "cost" to the government.

24 posted on 10/12/2011 4:52:39 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"the existing system benefits mostly the rich"

America WAS a place where you strived to better your life, for your FAMILY, for your own self-respect, and the FREEDOM to choose your path.

For Liberals, whatever someone else has EARNED, they want it GIVEN to them.

Taxing success is their idea of Utopia.

25 posted on 10/12/2011 4:53:06 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is just nonsense. Ask anyone who has an IRA what happens when you make a withdrawal. The answer: The withdrawal adds to your taxable income and is taxed at your maximum tax rate. The Government is doing better than just fine with the system they have.


26 posted on 10/12/2011 4:53:17 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
One way to cease the process of “subsidizing” retirement systems,
is to stop all contributions,
treat contents as currently taxable income,
at current rate or some reduced rate.
And to release the residual to individuals, permanently.

To be fair, all defined contribution systems
would have to assess a current worth,
disperse that worth, and close all operations,
for the dispersed worth to be taxed exactly the same way.
This should include all municipal systems,
federal systems, and labor unions.

Additionally, to be fair,
all social security benefits
would be assessed, taxed, and dispersed,
and Social Security Closed as a system,
returning, post taxation, all worth to the individual.

I can just hear the Primal Screams

27 posted on 10/12/2011 4:55:09 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Katherine Ann

Maybe before the election, but during the bail-out period.

Bush was a zombie during that period and just let the Democrats run everything.


28 posted on 10/12/2011 4:55:20 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
They aren't threatening your existing 401(k) balance.

What they are considering is lowering the maximum allowed contribution. It's currently $16,500/year, with an additional $5,500 if you are over 50. You simply won't be able to contribute as much in the future.

The claim is that it primarily benefits the "rich". The problem is: that's peanuts to the "rich". What's really happening is that the upper middle class (like me) is socking away as much as possible in preparation for retirement, with the expectation that Social Security is going to be "means-tested" out of existence for me.

29 posted on 10/12/2011 4:55:26 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I thought that IRAs and 401Ks do NOT cost the government tax revenue long term.

That's correct, but these guys are all about pushing costs into the future. If all they are looking to do it make it through the 2012 election, what good is taxing the gains on someone's tax-deferred retirement plan 20 years from now?

30 posted on 10/12/2011 4:56:39 PM PDT by Cu Roi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not if they want to claim to be in faovr of the middle class.


31 posted on 10/12/2011 5:01:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You know those tens of thousands 401(k)’s are driving Schumer, Reid, Durbin and all the rest of the democrats crazy. They probably sit around a table every day trying to figure out how to get hold of the millions of dollars in those IRA’s. Or, at least a way to tax them. They probably have nightmare’s thinking about all that money sitting there with DEFERRED TAXES, that can’t be taxed until the IRA’s are cashed in.


32 posted on 10/12/2011 5:02:35 PM PDT by jmax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“So long term, it doesn’t “cost” the government any tax revenue, because the taxes are paid on the back end, not year by year.”

If you die with 401K money, your beneficiaries avoid tax on gains altogether.


33 posted on 10/12/2011 5:03:13 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
Since Cain’s 9-9-9 plan does not preserve the deduction for 401Ks

Good for him. I would also eliminate the mortgage deduction. All deductions gone and all taxes lowered across the board. (note: I take the max 401 every year along with a large mortgage deduction which I would lose).

34 posted on 10/12/2011 5:03:42 PM PDT by palmer (Before reading this post, please send me $2.50)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Even THREATEN to tax my 401(k) and I will abandon the program, take the tax hit

Tax hit plus 10% penalty if you are not yet 59 1/2 years old yet.

35 posted on 10/12/2011 5:06:44 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Citizen Cain is good enough for me! - "refermech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You’re assuming they’ll let you do that. Never underestimate the greed of Government.


36 posted on 10/12/2011 5:06:44 PM PDT by WeatherGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I consider most of the money I pay in taxes “WASTED”.


37 posted on 10/12/2011 5:15:49 PM PDT by MtnClimber (The left wants our power generated by unicorns running on treadmills. What dopes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

If you die, the heirs pay tax on what they get unless they roll it over into a survivor Ira. I think they pay income tax on what they don’t roll over. Not cap gains.


38 posted on 10/12/2011 5:24:43 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Actually you probably have a lower income tax rate when you take it out. Put in in and don’t pay taxes until you retire and most people are in a lower bracket plus you don’t pay FICA on it ever.


39 posted on 10/12/2011 5:27:06 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Actually you probably have a lower income tax rate when you take it out. Put in in and don’t pay taxes until you retire and most people are in a lower bracket plus you don’t pay FICA on it ever.


40 posted on 10/12/2011 5:27:06 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson