Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Tappan Zee bridge in NY pegged at $5.2 billion
Associated Press ^ | October 12, 2011 | Jim Fitzgerald

Posted on 10/12/2011 5:18:27 PM PDT by decimon

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. (AP) — The cost of a new Tappan Zee Bridge in the New York City suburbs has been shaved to $5.2 billion by focusing solely on the bridge, a federal agency said Tuesday.

In the past, mass transit components, ranging up to a new commuter rail line, were considered key elements of a new span over the Hudson River.

President Barack Obama chose the project Monday for quick federal approval of environmental and other permits, and the Federal Highway Administration said those could be obtained within a year. Construction, creating thousands of jobs, could begin soon afterward, it said.

>

In 2008, several designs for a new bridge were unveiled, with costs estimated at the time at $9 billion to $16 billion depending on which mass transit options were included. The possibilities ranged from upgraded bus service to light rail to an east-west commuter rail line that would link several existing north-south routes.

The FHA said the cost could have exceeded $21 billion.

>

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: tappanzee; tappanzeebridge

1 posted on 10/12/2011 5:18:33 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Up the river ping.


2 posted on 10/12/2011 5:19:16 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Double it to factor in NY State corruption and incompetency.
3 posted on 10/12/2011 5:20:12 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
No funds have been officially earmarked for the project, authorities said. "As of right now, there is no funding in the (state) budget," said Jessica Proud, spokeswoman for Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino, who has been pushing for a quick start on the project. "We've asked the governor to put it in his five-year capital plan, but it's not, yet."
4 posted on 10/12/2011 5:24:31 PM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

How corrupt. They could include a single-track rail connector on the bridge for that $5.2 billion, too, if not for their corruption. (They wouldn’t have to pay NJ Transit any more for running to Port Jervis, then, and the trains could go right to Grand Central. But who wants to save the taxpayer any money, eh?)


5 posted on 10/12/2011 5:25:20 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Anyone happen to know the original estimates for the Boston Big Dig vs final cost ?


6 posted on 10/12/2011 5:27:14 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Double it. You makka me laff.

We should start an over under pool.

I’m in for greater than 25 billion Mr. Barker.


7 posted on 10/12/2011 5:35:55 PM PDT by onona (At the end of your life, you will be judged on love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

Originally 2.8 bil final cost 22 bil with interest, or 14.6 at time of completion.


8 posted on 10/12/2011 5:37:31 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

Exactly. And the longer they wait, the more it will cost. However, the Tappan Zee would be a top candidate on my list for replacement. I used to love it as a kid, heading up to New england for visits..but I’m cautious now...and take a longer way around. And I wouldn’t necessarily want to see the job go to the lowest bidder.


9 posted on 10/12/2011 5:37:38 PM PDT by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A commuter rail connector is a good idea, but what they really need is a freight rail connector permitting CSX to link their West Hudson and East Hudson divisions via Metro North. With the old Poughkeepsie rail bridge usable only as a hiking trail, this would permit the two divisions to communicate with each other south of the Selkirk bridge. CSX would pay for their share of the link, and that would lower the cost of the rail component of the bridge.


10 posted on 10/12/2011 5:42:16 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: decimon
quick federal approval of environmental and other permits, and the Federal Highway Administration said those could be obtained within a year.

Not so fast when it comes to oil drilling though is it? Like...never!

11 posted on 10/12/2011 5:43:19 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

How much would it be with Chinese steel? You know the kind that’s mixed with sand for a filler.


12 posted on 10/12/2011 5:44:24 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

This bridge is a toll bridge. So why is the government looking about replacing it.


13 posted on 10/12/2011 5:48:22 PM PDT by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

A commuter rail connector is a good idea, but what they really need is a freight rail connector permitting CSX to link their West Hudson and East Hudson divisions via Metro North. With the old Poughkeepsie rail bridge usable only as a hiking trail, this would permit the two divisions to communicate with each other south of the Selkirk bridge. CSX would pay for their share of the link, and that would lower the cost of the rail component of the bridge
Alas for the Poughkeepsie Bridge. Another victim of Conrail neglect (federal government). Of course, the federal government since the end of WWII regulated away the competitiveness of the railroads . . . and the Staggers Act helped some, but not enough to fend off the newer regulations that are imposed every time there's the slightest hint of a rail accident.

I like your ideas though. CSX does need that kind of link further down the Hudson. It'd probably make the Southern Tier (former Erie) more viable as well, i.e. if they can get around the NIMBY element that is apparently in Monsey and Tallman (that's keeping the Piermont Branch from being resurrected, IINM).
14 posted on 10/12/2011 5:49:46 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Pssst. Obama's plan is we burn up all of the Arab oil and then we will control the world-wide oil industry!

Of course, we will be living in an un-inhabitable jungle by then, but the plan will have succeeded. Very clever.

15 posted on 10/12/2011 5:59:02 PM PDT by Thom Pain (OMG ABO USA = USC: United States of Chicago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The idea of bringing Norfolk Southern’s ex-Erie into the game would create another partner that would further lower the cost of the bridge. This would provide a link to the NS/Pan American partnership in northern Massachusetts via trackage rights on CSX on either side of the Hudson. It would kill a whole flock of birds with one stone.


16 posted on 10/12/2011 5:59:51 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Publius

The biggest obstacles for CSX east of the Hudson River are the passenger service conflicts along the Metro-North route and the height and weight limits along the passenger lines in New York City. I don’t think that’s an issue that will ever be adequately addressed unless someone is willing to erase the map and start all over again.


17 posted on 10/12/2011 6:10:24 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: decimon

A Bridge That Has Nowhere Left to Go (NY’s Tappan Zee Bridge)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1560062/posts


18 posted on 10/12/2011 6:10:58 PM PDT by deks ("...the battle of our time is the battle of liberty against the overreach of the federal government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: ErnBatavia

The partying section is bigger than the two-bay truck house.


20 posted on 10/12/2011 6:44:57 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: decimon
"While the bridge is an engineering masterpiece, the writer cannot help but feel that it is unfortunately situated and destroys one of the finest water vistas in the world."

Arthur G. Adams
The Hudson, a guidebook to the river

21 posted on 10/12/2011 6:55:54 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The cost of a new Tappan Zee Bridge in the New York City suburbs has been shaved to $5.2 billion

The existing bridge was completed in 1955 at a cost of $80.8 million.

ML/NJ

22 posted on 10/12/2011 7:34:46 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
"...I used to love it as a kid, heading up to New england for visits..but I’m cautious now...and take a longer way around. "

I first drove across the TZ shortly after it was opened. (Lived in CT)

Wasn't the TZ that drove me further north in frequent trips to CT. It was I-95/NJ Tp rat-race and expense.

From MD, I-83 to Harrisburg, I-81 to Scranton, and I-84 across PA & NY into CT. 60-Miles further but relaxing, cheaper, and usually takes close to the same amount of actual driving time.

Only drawback (for me...the driver) are the snow storms starting in early Dec. OTOH, big plus for the wife is the two casinos an hour-and-a-half apart on I-83.

Therefore, a 6-hour drive takes usually 16-, or 17-hours.

23 posted on 10/12/2011 7:35:19 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
>> The cost of a new Tappan Zee Bridge in the New York City suburbs has been shaved to $5.2 billion

> The existing bridge was completed in 1955 at a cost of $80.8 million.

Is that $80M in 1955 dollars or 2011 dollars? I would assume the former, and thus it would be many times that in 2011 dollars, due to inflation.

(I was only 3 in 1955. But for instance in 1969 gas cost 0.29/gal and a pack of smokes was $0.35 and now they're well over 10 times that.)

But even 20 times $80M is still only $1.6B.

24 posted on 10/12/2011 8:13:48 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

5.5 Billion? WTF!

25 posted on 10/12/2011 10:08:35 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Shea stadium (NY Mets) was completed in 1970 for 15-25 million depending on who you read. The new Mets stadium was recently completed at one billion. Inflation only explains a fraction of the price increase for this and the Tappan Zee Bridge. My take is the new stadium is more luxuriously built. Americans were modest in 1970 about what they expected in a baseball park. Factor two is tons more Gov’t regulations and need to hire expensive lawyers and architects to comply with them

Mens rooms in the old stadiums were stinkin holes. One just had a long piece of sheet steel you pissed against communally. This was good enough for me but no stadium today is built like this.


26 posted on 10/12/2011 11:40:35 PM PDT by dennisw (What good is a used up world and how could it be worth having - - Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
But even 20 times $80M is still only $1.6B.

That was sorta my point. I guess we should be grateful that they shaved costs.

ML/NJ

27 posted on 10/13/2011 5:02:25 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
I should also say that I don't think that back in 1955, that it cost anyone in Idaho even a dime; unless they came to NY and drove across the bridge.

ML/NJ

28 posted on 10/13/2011 5:06:22 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Double it to factor in NY State corruption and incompetency.

And cut the price in half if not for New York's prevailing wage laws that require all contractors, union and non-union, to pay "prevailing wages and benefits" to their employees. The prevailing wages and benefits are set by union thugs at the NYS Department of Labor to match the wages and benefits in the most recent collective baragining agreement for that particular trade in that area of the state even though only a small number of contruction workers in the state are union.

29 posted on 10/13/2011 5:26:17 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
> Mens rooms in the old stadiums were stinkin holes. One just had a long piece of sheet steel you pissed against communally. This was good enough for me but no stadium today is built like this.

I've been in some Country bars and dance halls that have exactly that type of accommodation. Yeah it stinks by the end of the night. But it works well and it saves on flush water. And it's easy to hit when you're staggering.

One local bar owner painted little black dots on the center of the sheet that looked like houseflies. It improved everybody's aim considerably. You're a guy so you know what I mean. LOL.

30 posted on 10/13/2011 7:34:29 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson