Skip to comments.
Adobe shows off new 'undo photo blur' feature
http://www.physorg.com ^
| 13 OCT 2011
| Bob Yirka
Posted on 10/13/2011 11:59:03 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: TSgt
AAAAGGGGHHHHH!
My EYES!!!
Next thing you know, somebody will post a photo of Frances Fox Piven.
To: andy58-in-nh
42
posted on
10/13/2011 12:52:20 PM PDT
by
Gator113
(~ Just livin' life~)
To: Steely Tom
43
posted on
10/13/2011 12:54:42 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
To: RegulatorCountry
HAHAHA! I thought those two photos were supposed to be supplied as a joke. There is absolutely NO way you could get the photo on the right from the one on the left. The detail is simply not there. Not even close.
I was shocked to see the same before and after at the link.
I need to go back to see if it is the Onion.
44
posted on
10/13/2011 12:57:28 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
Click the Pic Thank you, JoeProBono
Gary and Harriet Had a Fight
Gary Has Taken Up X-Treme Skateboarding Competition
Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!
Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly
Planning to donate at least $10? You can sponsor
one or more New Monthly Donors for no additional cost
FReepmail TheOldLady
45
posted on
10/13/2011 1:05:01 PM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: Sherman Logan
Already been done. A couple years back a guy posted video of himself raping children but with his face blurred out. Actually what he did was apply a pinwheel distortion to his face and the cops had a programmer write a routine to remap the swirl, or unwind it as it were.
46
posted on
10/13/2011 1:08:02 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: ElkGroveDan
Whatever it was, good for them.
To: SuzyQue
...The red flowers are outside the focal point of the lens, and were never in focus in the photo. Can undo what wasn’t done...Well, if the yellow flowers WERE inside the focal point why were they out of focus?
48
posted on
10/13/2011 1:14:48 PM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.)
To: Paradox
Thats a focus blur problem, not a motion blur problem. Exactly. There's no deconvolution information to be gained from that blur image. Typical un-tech article/editing.
49
posted on
10/13/2011 1:16:14 PM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: flaglady47
With cameras going the way of the smartphones and including accelerometers, sure, easy thing.
To: KarlInOhio; andy58-in-nh; Paradox; SuzyQue; dead; rdax
I wonder if they can use this technology on the Zapruder film?.........
51
posted on
10/13/2011 1:23:49 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
To: Red Badger
I use photoshop every day. THAT is amazing, awesome and NOT a trick. Just good coding. Congrats guys. Well done.
52
posted on
10/13/2011 1:42:46 PM PDT
by
Waywardson
(Carry on! Nothing equals the splendor!)
To: Red Badger
53
posted on
10/13/2011 1:45:03 PM PDT
by
earglasses
(I was blind, and now I hear...)
To: FReepaholic
They look to be in focus to me. Are you talking about the original photo, or the Photoshopped one?
54
posted on
10/13/2011 1:47:17 PM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: Red Badger
I don’t think so. It’s just undoing something, not “fixing” anything.
55
posted on
10/13/2011 1:54:58 PM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: SuzyQue
...They look to be in focus to me. Are you talking about the original photo, or the Photoshopped one?...Original.
56
posted on
10/13/2011 2:05:50 PM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.)
To: Red Badger
I wonder if they can use this technology on the Zapruder film?......... It would be good to have more evidence against the conspiracy theorists. Oswald did it.
57
posted on
10/13/2011 2:09:23 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Red Badger
I remember years ago watching, I think it was a 60 Minutes episode, a story about a camera lens that would take pictures and everything thin in the picture in the foreground and background would be in focus.
58
posted on
10/13/2011 2:14:37 PM PDT
by
killermosquito
(Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
To: FReepaholic
The one on the right,right?
59
posted on
10/13/2011 3:07:39 PM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: killermosquito
I remember years ago watching, I think it was a 60 Minutes episode, a story about a camera lens that would take pictures and everything thin in the picture in the foreground and background would be in focus. Was it some fancy technical solution or just a pinhole camera which would give an enormous depth of field?
60
posted on
10/13/2011 3:09:24 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
