Posted on 10/20/2011 1:12:42 PM PDT by Danae
Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1's natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.
In June 2008 no one was discussing Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) with regard to Obama. In fact, those who were discussing the then Senator’s citizenship status had focused instead on his birth in Hawaii in a attempt to prove the future president was not born in the United States despite publication of the Senator’s short form computer generated Birth Certificate. It would not be until October of 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility would be questioned as to his status as a dual citizen at the time of his birth.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
placemarker bump
M’Lady, you have nailed these bastards good and proper. They are a criminal enterprise.
So what can be done? Fact is fact, but we seem to be powerless in this country.
Got any other media pals who would be willing to run with this?
Minor v Happersett says no such thing. As quoted above.
Upon advice of council, McCain is a natural born U.S. Citizen. Beyond a reasonable doubt.
Obama’s status is reasonably doubtable. And in my personal opinion, he is not a natural born U.S. Citizen.
You might have done that at the start.
“Yup, Donofrio was saying that in the summer of ‘08.”
No he wasn’t. Donofrio didn’t say or do anything until late-October 2008. He tried filing a lawsuit a few days before the election, and I think he started blogging after the election.
Cleaning the hardware preparatory to this weekend.
Why is the flash suppressor on the AK loose?
Dang Romanians.
Citizen, yes. Natural Born Citizen, not so much.
Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects, save that of eligibility to the Presidency.
Yes, naturalized citizens are on equal legal footing with native citizens, except naturalized citizens aren't eligible for President and native citizens are.
But I get the feeling you're trying to read something different into that.
Or remove it all together, but stand back 6’ when firing.
Definitely not true. His first TWO blogs got kicked off the host site -- and he has had trouble keeping his work online ever since.
Maybe it wasn't summer when I started reading him, but it was at least early fall.
I know because I remember thinking there was plenty of time, a few months, before the election to straighten it out and get it before the SCOTUS.
I just clicked the link and I get no virus alerts, no spyware, no pop up ads. Why are you lying, bumble?
I get no spyware, malware, pop ups, virus warnings, nada. Just have Firefox and Norton.
That is not how I read it. The constitution makes a distinction between native citizens and natural born citizens with regard to presidential eligibility. Being native born isn't enough. It specifically says natural born, not native born.
I have been in touch with several. In a nutshell, the MSM has been downsizing. They are letting investigative reporters go. That means those left have to pick up the slack. Every oneof them is streched way too thin. Therefore it is up to the Blogger community to pick it up. From there, Conservative Talk Radio. Once it hits THERE... then the MSM will pick it up. If it does. They are so in the tank for Obama..... we shall see.
“Definitely not true. His first TWO blogs got kicked off the host site”
Yes, he DID quit his first two blogs. But he created both of them AFTER the election.
November 10, 2008 was his first post at http://blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen . He even calls this the “original” blog at http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/ .
Then on November 22, 2008, he moved to http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com/ . His first post mentions the blogtext.org network shutting down.
Then he moved to http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ on December 1, 2008.
“I know because I remember thinking there was plenty of time, a few months, before the election to straighten it out and get it before the SCOTUS.”
I’m sorry, but your memory is wrong.
But the quote says there’s a difference between naturalized citizens and native citizens. Those are the only two categories mentioned. And it says the difference is in eligibility to the Presidency. Naturalized citizens, obviously, aren’t eligible. The quote doesn’t make any sense unless it’s saying that native citizens ARE.
The Constitution does NOT make a distinction between a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen” AT ALL.
Our Constitution doesn’t mention “native citizen” at all.
Of U.S. citizens our Constitution only mentions or envisions two categories, those that are born with natural allegiance to these United States and those who must be “naturalized” into that state of allegiance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.