Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rangel wants wealth redistribution, says rich didn't sacrifice for war
The Hill ^ | October 26, 2011 | Pete Kasperowicz

Posted on 10/26/2011 9:39:39 AM PDT by jazusamo

Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) on Wednesday called for the redistribution of America's riches and hammered the wealthy for benefitting from a war effort fought by the poor and middle class.

Citing statistics that show 1 percent of Americans now own 42 percent of the nation's wealth, the lawmaker representing Harlem said: "There is something wrong with that formula."

Rangel offered no specific remedy for adjusting those figures during his comments on the House floor, but argued further that the wealthiest one percent have the added benefit of not needing to get involved in military service.

"Why is it that we know, or that we can suspect, that in this war where we lost so many lives, that so many people have been wounded, that our brave men and women coming home will subject themselves with a lack of funds to deal with their physical or mental problems?" he asked. "Any yet we somehow know that that 1 percent was not involved in defending our great nation."

"We can almost know without any investigation that the wealthiest of Americans never found themselves protecting our flag," he added.

Rangel said the economy would be helped by getting more money in the hands of the other 99 percent. "If we have the other 99 percent of the people who are not wealthy, and if it was possible for them to get a fair shake and have more expendable income, you wouldn't have to put out ads for them to buy," he said.

Rep. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) spoke after Rangel and argued and the U.S. as a nation is not broke, even though the federal government is broke. the U.S. is effectively keeping the federal government broke by not taxing the wealthy, he said.

"Despite what you hear on TV, despite what you hear on Fox News today, taxes as a percentage of GDP today are at a 60 year low," Murphy said.

Murphy said taxing the top 1 percent more is a needed step because the income of the other 99 percent has remained mostly flat over the past several years, while the income of the top tier has increased sharply.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; ethics; notaxes4dnc; notaxes4ge; notaxes4kerry; notaxes4rangel; rangel; taxes
C'mon Charlie, you fought against communism in the Korean war and now you're advocating a form of it for us. You also weren't very anxious to pay your fair share of taxes when your hid income from the IRS.
1 posted on 10/26/2011 9:39:44 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Unreal. I truly dislike this bunch. Charlie lets start with you! You put up a fight when you had to pay the IRS.


2 posted on 10/26/2011 9:44:15 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

My Dentist runs a huge dental clinic that offers every kind of dental work imaginable. He’s a very wealthy man. He also goes to Iraq/Afghanistan every year for 3 months and offers his services to the soldiers. So up yours Charlie.


3 posted on 10/26/2011 9:44:34 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Doesn't Rangel describe the communists manifesto to reduce all citizens to an equal status and then subject them to slavery? Democrats are communists and there is no doubt about that.
4 posted on 10/26/2011 9:45:55 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think we need to call him “Charlie Censure” from now on.

The largest group of people that are trying to stop people from becoming rich, in this country, are liberal democrats. It sure as hell isn’t those already “rich”. I don’t see the mountain of evidence for that. I see the mountain of evidence against liberal democrats however, of doing just that.


5 posted on 10/26/2011 9:47:41 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

6 posted on 10/26/2011 9:49:56 AM PDT by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The slum lord opens his fat mouth again..

While Charles Rangel lived across the street in luxury Harlem digs, his tenants coped with collapsing ceilings, sinking floors and roaches.

In just one apartment in the six-unit building on West 132nd Street, city inspectors found nine violations in 2003. Rangel and his wife, Alma — the landlords — were ordered to repair the wood floor in the entire apartment, plaster, paint, fix broken bathroom tiles and faulty window frames, and get rid of roaches and mice.

The city also found that the Rangels failed to file the building's annual occupancy statement five times between 1982 and 1996.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/slumlord_violations_8D68lRn3jMaUi7x5o9tX2L

7 posted on 10/26/2011 9:50:13 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’m still trying to figure out how a person who has never worked in the private sector made so much money.


8 posted on 10/26/2011 9:50:37 AM PDT by Drill Thrawl (0 - 537 They ALL must go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Lotta chutzpah coming from a tax cheat whose salary is paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.


9 posted on 10/26/2011 9:50:47 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
...that our brave men and women coming home will subject themselves with a lack of funds to deal with their physical or mental problems?" he asked.

I see the English language is not one of his strong suits either.

10 posted on 10/26/2011 9:53:46 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

I believe we all know how he made much of his money, and it wasn’t legal. Then when he got caught red handed for tax fraud the IRS wouldn’t prosecute, if it would have been you or I we would have been in a federal courtroom.


11 posted on 10/26/2011 9:57:24 AM PDT by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If Rangel took 30 seconds to do a Google search before he opened his tax-evading mouth, he’d know he’s full of it.

Here’s an interesting article about CEOs and military service.

http://www.gijobs.com/jmo-to-ceo.aspx


12 posted on 10/26/2011 9:59:16 AM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl
Well one thing...is All members of Congress can do "insider" trading legally.

So...if they are getting ready to over regulate / deregulate or mandate eggs, lumber, coal, miners..etc, you name it....They can buy or sell shares/futures...knowing what's going to happen in advance.

13 posted on 10/26/2011 10:03:06 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Go catch some rays, Fat Butt....Nobody cares what you think!
14 posted on 10/26/2011 10:04:24 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Rangel wants wealth redistribution”

LOL! So get crackin’ Rangel...what frauds these people are.


15 posted on 10/26/2011 10:05:15 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Charlie, how much of that Pay for Play have you Ratholed in some off shore account? Let’s start with you with an audit of your campaign treasury.


16 posted on 10/26/2011 10:06:14 AM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Let’s start with Charlie. Would he be willing to accept a salary that is mean/median/mode of his fellow country men?


17 posted on 10/26/2011 10:18:24 AM PDT by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Funny stuff coming from a tax cheat and a con-man.


18 posted on 10/26/2011 10:18:40 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici ("Si, se gimme!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I thought 'Cheat'em' Charlie was one of those 'rich' people he babbles about. Or is it the usual Liberal crap about this only applying to other 'rich' people?
19 posted on 10/26/2011 10:19:26 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He an his constituents need to go live in North Korea and then get back with us on how it’s going.


20 posted on 10/26/2011 10:24:26 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sounds silly, but Bob Casey won himself a Pennsylvania Senate seat with a not dissimilar argument.


21 posted on 10/26/2011 10:30:28 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Boy, they don’t even bother to hide the Marxism any more.


22 posted on 10/26/2011 10:35:27 AM PDT by Marathoner (Occupy Wall Street = Parasites on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What these ideological resentful jerks don’t acknowledge is that wealth is not something that just ‘exists’. Wealth is the result of effort, risk taking, and innovation. It’s not something that is there at baseline, to just be harvested and distributed. If you take away the incentive of those who create wealth, you will not have wealth. It’s that simple.

Further, Charlie, if you don’t have wealth as a nation, it doesn’t matter who you put on the battlefield. You can’t fight a war without weapon systems and money. Poor countries with big populations are not necessarily world powers. Further, compare the standard of living of poor in this country, with the average standard of living in much of the world. Even the poorest here in the US live relatively well, Charlie, because the cumulative wealth here is higher - thanks to a system that allows people to benefit from their own efforts.


23 posted on 10/26/2011 10:36:23 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ok Charlie, which one of your beach houses are you willing to give up for the cause?

24 posted on 10/26/2011 10:39:54 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He means reparations when he and his ilk talk of wealth redistribution.


25 posted on 10/26/2011 10:43:45 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What most of these people (libs) aren’t getting is: taxes are not the only thing that redistributes the wealth. How about jobs? Jobs that the wealthy create. THEY pay the wages for the people they hire, NOT the government. So, I would say they ARE paying “their fair share”after all, yes? I wish THAT would get pointed out to the libs; also, NO ONE questions WHY they need to pay more in taxes. For what? So the “demons” can keep on spending OUR money on what THEY want, or giving it away to other countries?? THAT”S why the wealthy have to pay more??


26 posted on 10/26/2011 10:47:08 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (The American Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Rep. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) spoke after Rangel and argued and the U.S. as a nation is not broke, even though the federal government is broke. the U.S. is effectively keeping the federal government broke by not taxing the wealthy, he said.”

Rep Murphy is welcome to move to Cuba. Before he does, how about APOLOGIZING to the slim percentage of Americans that pay the majority of our taxes? What rate is the correct rate Mr. Murphy? 60%? 70%? 95%? At what point should hardworking Americans simply acknowledge their status as slaves? Further, how incredibly insulting to suggest more ‘revenue’ is needed when so much of our tax dollars are pissed away.

I like Perry’s plan. I like parts of Cain’s plan. I sure as hell hate the notion that we need to further tax ANYONE, especially those who create jobs and invest in our economy!

Can these dems just come out of the political closet start flying their sicle and hammer flag as the party logo?


27 posted on 10/26/2011 10:48:12 AM PDT by Made In The USA (This post may be recorded for quality purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Another millionaire tax-cheat communist racist traitor... what’s not to hate?

LLS


28 posted on 10/26/2011 10:48:47 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("Americans are hungry to feel once again a sense of mission and greatness." Ronaldo Magnus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly

AND, if you redistribute the wealth enough (give it all to the poor), then the poor become the rich. Then what? Redistribute again? And, as Poster #23 said, where would the incentive be to become wealthy and prosperous. These idiots are not thinking this thru - and they never will, as they are not logical.


29 posted on 10/26/2011 10:52:33 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (The American Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson