Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Transparent Administration Ever Wants Cover Up Law ^ | October 27, 2011 | Mike Shedlock

Posted on 10/27/2011 8:32:40 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Justice Department of the Obama Administration, the self-proclaimed "most transparent administration ever Proposes Letting Government to Respond to Freedom of Information Requests Denying Existence of the Documents.

A longtime internal policy that allowed Justice Department officials to deny the existence of sensitive information could become the law of the land -- in effect a license to lie -- if a newly proposed rule becomes federal regulation in the coming weeks.

The proposed rule directs federal law enforcement agencies, after personnel have determined that documents are too delicate to be released, to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests "as if the excluded records did not exist."

Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, says the move appears to be in direct conflict with the administration's promise to be more open.

"Despite all the talk of transparency, I can't think of what's less transparent than saying a document does not exist, when in fact, it does," Sekulow told Fox News.

Earlier this year, in a case involving the Islamic Council of Southern California brought against the FBI after the plaintiffs learned about the existence of documents denied by the FBI, a federal judge in California expressed great concern about the agency using the internal policy not only in response to the FOIA but to mislead the court.

"The government, cannot, under any circumstance, affirmatively mislead the court. … The court simply cannot perform its constitutional function if the government does not tell the truth," the judge wrote in a stinging rebuke.

A final version of the proposal could be issued by the end of 2011. If approved, the new rule would officially become a federal regulation with the force of law.

Pure Insanity

This proposed law is pure insanity. Wrong accused persons might go to prison or guilty persons purposely protected based on this law.

All that is required is for some government official (possibly protecting himself or his department) to think information is "too sensitive".

The U.S. should be ashamed to even consider such a law. It;s just a license to cover up by government officials.

Merkel's Grateful Idiots  

A few weeks ago everyone knew German Chancellor Angela Merkel lied about leverage to the German Parliament. Nonetheless, and disgustingly, this morning the Bundestag was all too willing to Approve a "Blank Check" for Unlimited EFSF Leverage.

For this, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says Thank you Germany

Alone among EU leaders, Chancellor Angela Merkel goes to tonight’s summit in Brussels with an iron-clad mandate. It is a remarkable moment. Never before – to my knowledge – has a national parliament demanded and held a prior vote on an EU summit accord.

Had this principle been established a long time ago, we might have avoided much of the relentless Treaty creep and EU aggrandizement advanced by secret deals at the Bâtiment Justus Lipsius. Thank you Germany.

Thank you too, judges of the Verfassungsgericht, for giving the Bundestag a veto on EU encroachments on fiscal sovereignty. The court is seemingly the only tribunal willing and able to defend the liberties of European citizens against EU over-reach, and is therefore my supreme court too even as a British citizen.
Opposition Leader Rebukes Merkel's Lies and Arrogance of Power

Pritchard continues ....

Dr Merkel has won her vote. She secured an "own majority" for proposals to leverage the €440bn bail-out fund (EFSF) into the stratosphere, with the support of some very sheepish looking law-makers from posturing Free Democrats and Bavaria’s Social Christians.

But what a price she paid. The credibility of her team is shattered. Europe has all but destroyed her, even if she manages to limp on to the next crisis.

As she glowered darkly, speaker after speaker from the Social Democrats (SPD), the Greens, and Die Linke, asked how she could possibly reconcile her plan to leverage the EFSF to €1 trillion or €1.5 trillion (we still don’t know how much) with solemn pledges to the Bundestag just three weeks ago that there would be no such leverage.

"Shameless abuse of the truth," was the verdict of SPD leader Frank-Walter Steinmeier. The government had acted "tactically" at every turn, "misled the people", "held back information", "crossed every red line", brought Europe "to its knees" with botched policies, and lied blatantly about EFSF leverage.

"You came here to say there would be no leverage, not three years ago, not three months ago, but three weeks ago. You denied everything."

Die Linke (Left) leader Gregor Gysi was electrifying. "It is the arrogance of power," he began, and never let go.

"Every week you come up with a different story about this crisis."

"We were told there would be no leverage and you have reversed everything in a matter of weeks. Now we learn that the 20pc loss will fall entirely on taxpayers. They alone will pay. That is the decision you are taking."
"Why don’t you tell German taxpayers the truth? They are being asked to pay the losses for French banks."

Green leader Jürgen Trittin rebuked Dr Merkel for hiding the true implications of EFSF leverage, particularly the plan to insure the first 20pc of losses on Club Med bonds.

"Why are you shying away from telling the people the truth? You must tell people what this leverage means. You must explain to them what the risk is, and why it is necessary. But you wriggled out of it."

"You came here three weeks ago and said there would be no leverage. This is the sort of thing that unnerves people."

And so it went on, raw red-blooded democracy.

The unpleasant truth is that the EFSF leverage proposals are idiotic, the worst sort of financial engineering, legerdemain, and trickery.
Grateful for Idiocy, a Pack of Lies, Financial Engineering, Legerdemain, and Trickery

Other than the ruling by the German Supreme Court there is nothing to be grateful for. The "unpleasant truth" is Merkel lied to parliament about leverage, which is why the EFSF was approved in the first place. Having secured passage of the EFSF via bald-faced lies, the Bundestag ignored the lies and approved a blank check on the amount of leverage and the method of leverage.

Pritchard notes the EFSF leverage proposals are idiotic, the worst sort of financial engineering, legerdemain, and trickery" and for that he says "Thank you Germany".

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: doj; foia; secrecy; transparency

1 posted on 10/27/2011 8:32:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Absolute proof positive of what I've been saying: the Obama administration's notion of transparency is modelled on the Romulan cloaking device from Star Trek.

See! it's transparent! you can't see it!

2 posted on 10/27/2011 8:36:43 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

i like jay sekelow.

but how does this law get through a republican-controlled congress?

3 posted on 10/27/2011 8:38:28 AM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Winston Smiths job security may be on the line here.

4 posted on 10/27/2011 8:55:01 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The democrats have studied Joseph Goebbels work well.Say one thing while doing another.Name bills things like Affordable Healthcare while it raises rates through the ceiling,pass jobs bills that cost trillions bit create zero jobs.I just read this morning that now they are referring to Congress as the “do nothing Republican led” congress even though it is democrats holding the upper chamber.I am flabbergasted at their lies but then I see all of the useful idiots parroting them.....

5 posted on 10/27/2011 9:48:38 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

“but how does this law get through a republican-controlled congress?”

Because they — Dems and Republicans alike — just don’t read the bills they vote on.

6 posted on 10/27/2011 10:03:35 AM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ken21

how does this law get through a republican-controlled congress?

Because it is NOT a LAW. It is a regulation promulgated by the Federal Agency. You will find any such proposal in the Code of Federal Regulations.

7 posted on 10/27/2011 1:47:10 PM PDT by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Help!

This proposed law is pure insanity.


it says it is a proposed law.

8 posted on 10/27/2011 2:43:35 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson