Skip to comments.Republicans' war on abortion rights continues: But we can't give up the fight for women's rights
Posted on 10/27/2011 12:23:47 PM PDT by presidio9
On Nov. 8, Mississippi residents will vote on a proposed constitutional amendment that would categorize a fertilized human egg as a legal person. If passed, this measure would prohibit not only abortion, but common birth control methods such as the IUD. While a similar measure was twice defeated in Colorado, in 2008 and 2010, by wide margins, other states - including Florida and Ohio - are considering comparable initiatives.
These attacks are dangerous, but they are nothing new, part of a century-long war on women. While we all know it generally takes two to tango when it comes to sex, women - specifically poor women - have historically paid the disproportionate share of the price when politics and misguided morality triumph over public health necessities.
One hundred years ago this month, my grandmother began her career as an advocate. A recent arrival in New York herself, Margaret Sanger worked as a nurse in the lower East Side, where immigrants lived crowded in fetid tenements and the infant mortality rate was of Third World proportions.
My grandmother was particularly struck by the daily drudgery of mothers. She immediately saw the connection between the dire living conditions and the fact that many births were unwanted, recalling one 72 year-old woman who said "she would gladly have another baby if nature were willing, but her daughters and sons, who had endured poverty and neglect. . .preferred risking imprisonment and death rather than bearing children and have them go through what they lived through."
My grandmother soon learned that women were routinely denied access to contraception and information about how to prevent pregnancies. It was the attitude at the time that women - and women alone - were responsible for the consequences of marital relations. The draconian Comstock Laws made it illegal to distribute contraceptives or provide educational materials about sexual health or reproduction, as this information was then considered "lascivious."
My grandmother soon discovered that Comstock carried implications far more serious than censorship when she tried to save the life of one of her patients following a botched back-alley abortion. She swore "no more" and founded the birth control movement in America, subsequently opening the first of her clinics in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn.
Her clinic was open less than two weeks before being closed by the police as a "public nuisance." She went to jail for 30 days, but kept fighting, eventually founding the International Planned Parenthood Federation.
Today, IPPF has more service points worldwide than McDonald's does franchises, providing millions with contraception and reproductive health care each year. In the U.S., Planned Parenthood partners with city, state and federal health agencies to bring healthcare to those who cannot afford it.
But then again, many modern-day Comstocks are seeking to characterize sex as a public threat, trying to pass legislation that will once more burden the poorest of mothers. The proposed amendment in Mississippi - as well as other anti-woman initiatives brewing in other states - compromises decades of hard- won gains in public health, all for the sake of outdated and dangerous ideology. There is, in fact, nothing ideal about denying women the health services and education they need and want: We know from experience that women will risk their lives to avoid unwanted pregnancies.
My grandmother's cause began a century ago this month in the slums of lower Manhattan; her fight continues today. And like Margaret Sanger, we will not retreat until reproductive rights and health become a reality for all.
Your grandmother was a Nazi, boy. Not to mention being a murderer and a racist. I’d change my last name if I were you.
Sanger? Hmmm. Where have I heard that name before?
Thats interesting, is ‘women’s rights’ about nothing more than abortion? Seems a very narrow view of it. Then again if you thinking about it abortion is nothing more than murder relabeled reaching genocidal proportions. So women’s rights is about genocide? I think thats whats its morphed into. Its odd those in favor of abortion call those who oppose it nazis since they could teach Hitler a thing or 2 about wholesale murder and how to sell it to the public.
What a novelty. Imagine that! Almost as crazy as the notion that God exists.
Who is this Alexander Sanger, anyways? Grandson of Margaret?
Anyone supportive of Eugenics needs to be put on the ash heap of history.
My grandmother's cause began a century ago this month in the slums of lower Manhattan; (because that is where the black human weeds lived and reproduced) her fight continues today. As long as there are black babies Sanger knows that her genocide is not complete.
wonder why she didn't abort him.
Like he’s saying that he’s against abortion but for the right for women to have one.
Your freaking hag of a grandmother was a racist eugenicist who was friends with Lothrop Stoddard and spoke to a KKK meeting.
What a moral midget.
Ah, upon closer inspection it appears so... “My grandmother”
Not only is he not saying that, the article does not even conceed any potential side-effects or negative aspects to an abortion. He celebrates the procedure. Living a life in the shadow of a famous ancestor is always tragic.
Even if you couldn’t be bothered to read the article before posting (I am often guilty of this myself), my initial post to this thread should have tipped you off.
BTW, if you click on the link to the story, it includes a video that has to be seen to be believed.
War on women
No mention of killing babies, so I guess that's okay with Mr. Sanger.
*** misguided morality triumph over public health necessities***.
No need to read any more from this reprobate.
Morality is the glue that holds civilization together.
Abortion is not health care - it is murder.
This gub mint forces me to pay for others abortions.
That is f-ing wrong.
Abortion has what, exactly, to do with rights? Or health care?
No abortion proponent has ever explained those.
If you pay attention to abortion proponents, the “right” to abort is the only right women have or should care about. Similarly, women need no form of health care whatsoever, as long as they can have unlimited abortions. These so-called feminists have an extremely narrow view of women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.