Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Government Seeks to Create Website Ban List
The New American ^ | Thursday, 27 October 2011 | Written by Raven Clabough

Posted on 10/28/2011 5:14:47 PM PDT by Publius2012

U.S. Government Seeks to Create Website Ban List Written by Raven Clabough Thursday, 27 October 2011 16:23

The U.S. House of Representatives recently introduced a “rogue websites” bill that has managed to attract bipartisan support even though it would force Internet Service Providers to create a list of banned websites and prevent users of those websites from accessing their sites. The list is all too similar to the “ban lists” that are found in China. reports: “US lawmakers introduced a bill on Wednesday that would give US authorities more tools to crack down on websites accused of piracy of movies, television shows and music and the sale of counterfeit goods.”

Entitled the Stop Online Piracy Act, the bill reads:

A service provider shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures designed to prevent access by its subscribers located within the United States to the foreign infringing site (or portion thereof) that is subject to the order, including measures designed to prevent the domain name of the foreign infringing site (or portion thereof) from resolving to that domain name’s Internet Protocol address.

It is the House version of a bill that was introduced in the U.S. Senate earlier this year called the Theft of Intellectual Property Act or Protect IP Act.

While the touted focus of the bill is on foreign websites, it may just as easily be applied to all .com domains.

The very language of the bill indicates it is trying to empower the federal government to ban websites.

According to journalist Paul Joseph Watson, “The only difference between this system and the draconian measures currently in place in countries like Iran, China and North Korea, is that the ISP’s would be mandated to enforce the ban list, rather than the websites being blocked via a centralized government hub.”

The Center for Democracy and Technology issued a statement indicating that the House version of the bill “includes the most controversial parts of the Senate’s Protect IP Act, but radically expands the scope.” It adds, “Any website that features user-generated content or that enables cloud-based data storage could end up in its crosshairs.”

“Internet Service Providers would face new and open-ended obligations to monitor and police user behavior,” the CDT said. “Payment processors and ad networks would be required to cut off business with any website that rightsholders allege hasn’t done enough to police infringement.”

The proposal is not much different from the Internet kill switch proposed by Senator Joe Leiberman (D-Conn.), who said during an appearance on CNN, “Right now in China, the government can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too.”

Lieberman has moved to shut down websites such as Amazon and Wikileaks without a court order.

Likewise, the Department of Homeland Security has seized a number of websites just for linking to copyrighted material, even when that material wasn’t hosted on the website itself. Responding to this, the Electronic Frontier Foundation called the government’s actions “Blunt instruments that cause unacceptable collateral damage to free speech rights.”

Once again, the federal government is being given permission to act in violation of individual rights just based on an accusation of something believed to be unlawful, without legal process.

The newest proposal to acquire the ability to ban websites should not come as too much of a shock, as the government has already taken the authority to demand that websites remove information and videos which contain too much “government criticism.” Google admits that there has been a substantial increase in the number of requests by the federal government to take down certain information.

“In the US, Google received 757 takedown requests across its sites and services, up 70 per cent from the second half of last year,” reports technology website“US authorities also called for the removal of 113 videos from YouTube, including several documenting alleged police brutality which Google refused to take down.”

In Google’s newly released transparency report, it reveals that the number of “user data requests” by U.S. authorities has increased by 29 percent over the course of the last reporting period. In the case of the removal of a YouTube video, for example, the reason listed was “government criticism,” and no content of the video was indicated or explained. Other videos which have been ordered to be taken down pertain to police brutality on the grounds of defamation.

Interestingly, the number of items requested by the U.S. government to be removed actually surpasses the number requested to be removed by authorities in China.

Meanwhile, Verisign, the global authority over .com domain names, has already demanded the power to destroy any website deemed “abusive” when a government orders it to be done, even if it is so ordered without court order and without any oversight.

“The company said today it wants to be able to enforce the “denial, cancellation or transfer of any registration” in any of a laundry list of scenarios where a domain is deemed to be “abusive,” reports the UK Register.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: censorship; communism; economy; housebill; prison; statism; totalitarian; tyranny

1 posted on 10/28/2011 5:14:49 PM PDT by Publius2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

This is the protect IP act. It will fail at it’s target, fighting online piracy, which I support, but it will give the government and business the ability to arbitrarily shut off websites they disagree with. Since when has adding government oversight on the internet improved anything?

This turkey needs to be cooked and tossed in the trash heap of bad ideas.

2 posted on 10/28/2011 5:23:28 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

This is a horrible bill.

3 posted on 10/28/2011 5:25:57 PM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

Freakin’ politicians. They’ve got to stick their big noses into everything. We’ve got to get rid of the maggots on the Hill. We need some new guys up there. Americans only preferred.

4 posted on 10/28/2011 5:27:25 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop Government Greed Now!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

I get it! They want to ban YouTube.

PHOOEY to them!!!!

5 posted on 10/28/2011 5:28:19 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012
I see a major 1st Amendment suit over this one.
6 posted on 10/28/2011 5:30:50 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Terrible bill. Lieberman really said that crap that the internet needs to be shut down in times of war?

Let Obama push this and see how fast he loses all the young people who’s work relies on this.

7 posted on 10/28/2011 5:31:34 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Do You Want FR To Survive?

Click The Starving Forum Skeleton To Donate

Then Support Your Forum

8 posted on 10/28/2011 5:32:28 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

It’s only statist tyranny when foreign countries do it.

9 posted on 10/28/2011 5:54:20 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

I hope this makes rank and file Democrats know the Dem Party is not good for them, and they will lose their rights if we don’t vote them out.

10 posted on 10/28/2011 5:55:30 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

That means the Internet is winning and they are not able to cover up their lies and corruption.

It’s sort a checks and balances thing that they hate.

So here comes the government trying to control the information.

11 posted on 10/28/2011 9:42:23 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius2012

Disgusting - - this monstrosity was introduced by a Republican and co-sponsored by 8 Republicans.

Latest Title: Stop Online Piracy Act
Sponsor: Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21] (introduced 10/26/2011) Cosponsors (12)
Latest Major Action: 10/26/2011 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

COSPONSORS(12), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
Rep Berman, Howard L. [CA-28] - 10/26/2011
Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] - 10/26/2011
Rep Bono Mack, Mary [CA-45] - 10/26/2011
Rep Chabot, Steve [OH-1] - 10/26/2011
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] - 10/26/2011
Rep Deutch, Theodore E. [FL-19] - 10/26/2011
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 10/26/2011
Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6] - 10/26/2011
Rep Griffin, Tim [AR-2] - 10/26/2011
Rep Ross, Dennis [FL-12] - 10/26/2011
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] - 10/26/2011
Rep Terry, Lee [NE-2] - 10/26/2011

12 posted on 10/28/2011 9:53:49 PM PDT by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson