Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Clements

a civil war, followed by California becoming North California and South California.


7 posted on 10/29/2011 12:48:40 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Supermans cape/ya don't spit into the wind...and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

As long as they don’t bring their idears to Alaska, they can do whatever they want.


8 posted on 10/29/2011 12:52:29 PM PDT by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck
North, Central and South would work better to divide us up. Everything north of Sacramento can be one state, everything south of Bakersfield can be a second, and everything in between can be a third. SoCal, NorCal and CentCal would group like items pretty well, assuming we were all our own states.

There's really no hope for us trapped behind the lines here anyway, but at least we'd be free from the cash-hungry oppression asylum of Sacramento. ;-)

12 posted on 10/29/2011 12:57:30 PM PDT by Steel Wolf ("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I like the idea of splitting up California as well. However, any region which includes San Francisco or Los Angeles will be destroyed forever by the liberals and the Taker class. Even Orange County, where I live, can not be relied upon because so many of our young people have been completely brainwashed by their professors. Within the next ten years Orange County will go democRAT.


16 posted on 10/29/2011 1:00:02 PM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson