Skip to comments.Coulter rips Cain allegations: Liberals "are terrified of strong, conservative black men"
Posted on 10/30/2011 8:44:20 PM PDT by martosko
Politico dropped a bombshell story Sunday evening, charging that GOP presidential front-runner Herman Cain was accused of sexual harassment by two unnamed females in the late 1990s when he was CEO of the National Restaurant Association.
During an appearance on Fox News Channels Geraldo at Large just an hour later, Ann Coulter likened the allegations to those Clarence Thomas faced in the early 1990s during his Supreme Court confirmation process. Liberals are terrified of Herman Cain, she said. He is a strong, conservative black man
They are terrified of strong, conservative black men.
born December 13, 1945 in Memphis, TN (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Luther Cain Jr., born March 16, 1925 in TN, died March 29, 1982 in Atlanta, GA
Lenora Davis, born July 27, 1925 in GA, died August 20, 2005 in Atlanta, GA
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Herman Cain is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama ISN'T!
Click on the cane, (#3 in rotation.)
Wow, where have they been? Funny, how things turn up.
The Politico article is several pages.
When will they dedicate this much investigative effort and space to owebama’s
2.) Educational “achievments”
3.) Social security number(s)
4.) Etc. Etc. Etc.
Well, at least according to left-stream media douchebag jonathan alter(ed reality) the owebama regime is completely scandal-free.
I think I’m gonna hurl.
“They are terrified of strong, conservative black men.”
Mainly because liberals don’t believe that ALL men are made (with equal abilities). It is an affront to their reality, and they don’t like it.
This was leaked in order to spice up the National Press Club appearance he is making tomorrow. That’s the only questions he will get.
Looks like Annie got a new dew since I last saw here on TV. I believe she’s on Hannity tomorrow night.
That's nothing. I had a female bartender/her husband/the bar owner/several bouncers accuse me of sexual harrassment, back about the same time too.
When they become named will be the time that Herman Cain can face his accusers. The leftists have no shame.
And if there was a settlement with a non-disclosure agreement, Cain won't be able to answer them directly. Gonna be ugly.
A successful black conservative is the left’s biggest nightmare... They will pull all the stops to Bork him.
So it’s pubic hair on a Coke can time again!
P.S. Hope her comment means that Annie’s back in the fold.
It is what they did to Clarence Thomas.
Annie the fag hag is deflecting blame away from her beloved Romney and Rove, who orchestrated this smear.
I do not disagree with your thoughts. However logically speaking, it is too early for the liberals to stick Cain with this type of explosive story. They would have waited until Cain actually won the nomination.
My first instinct is to suspect Romney operatives, because Romney feels Herman’s hot breath on the back of his neck already. I would also not rule out Perry opertives since Cain is the biggest obstruction in his path.
Liberals are such racists. They're always charging conservative black men with sexual harassment and yet Teddy Kennedy was their Saint.
She is attempting to take the heat off of Romney. Not going to happen.
Do we really know they’re responsible for this smear?
Im just guessing you arent running for President soon.
American Spectators discuss who did the hit on Cain? Some very interesting points being made...
Lets keep in mind that the 90's were a "hot" time for disgruntled women in corporate America to use every tool, including courts and allegations, to "get ahead".
"It don't mattuh wat he was accused of ... we just want to hear him deny it - hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I too first thoughts was to suspect Romney operatives, because Romney feels Hermans hot breath on the back of his neck already, but after seeing the pure vitriol that Perry Supporters have demonstrated toward Herman and considering ruff and tumble LBJ politics of Texas I to would not rule out Perry operatives. In fact Cain would be wise not to get in an car that hasn’t been throughly inspected anytime he’s in Texas.
Wow, is Ann getting ready to jump on the Cain train?
Very interesting. They make sense.
Thanx for link in Post #23.
That was precisely my reaction. This type of thing is their MO.
The Left must be scared if they feel the need to resort to this.
You are probably right...
Yes, Texas is LBJ country and Perry is desperate as he sees his poll numbers sinking. Perry is certainly a suspect.
Quite frankly, I don’t think the liberals are behind this. I think it’s Rove and crew. Is there any “roof”? No. But, well, there is a concerted effort by the GOP establishment to take down anyone threatening Romney. The GOP elites are the most likely suspects.
The more I think about this story, I am asking the same question every homicide detective asks himself...who is the most to gain from the crime!
If Herman is knocked off, who gains most of his support? Bingo! It won’t be Romney right now, and the democRats would have waited until after the GOP convention to spring a story like this and after Cain was the actual nominee.
I knew that some smears like this would up against Cain. Every time, a viable alternative to Romney starts to rise, out come the smears.
When Bachmann starts to rise, scurrilous questions about her husband surface.
When Perry starts to rise, out comes the N-rock story (granted Perry was self-destructing around the same time, but the rock story was just a way to finish him off
Now Cain starts to rise, we hear about sexual harassment.
I suppose these unnamed women will soon go public. Mat Lauer will interview them. They will shed a few tears and talk about how Cain propositioned him while delivering pizza or something.
The left always slings the mud. Remember the Bush Jr. drunk driving incident that they waited to spring on the public until a couple of days before the election.
If Cain survives these allegations, I am sure they have some other kind of mud to toss at him.
Herman Cain was CEO of the association from late 1996 through 1999. He challenged Bill Clinton on HillaryCare. Is it possible that some bimbo thought she was doing Bill Clinton a favor?
It was the butler with the candlestick in the library/
I agree with all of your premise. Why Dems would bash Cain so early? More likely RINO establishment hoping Romney or Perry get a bounce off this story. Romney would have the most to gain to get over the 29% ceiling in his poll numbers to lock up the nomination, although Perry could gain from a fall in Cain's momentum going into Iowa.
Karl Rove may have the same fear. Ann, please tell Karl to shut up!
That should be a permanent crawler on every TV news and opinion show.
The guy in the center is Robert C. Byrd.
You are obviously not familiar with liberals. They will smear anyone they perceive as a threat, now or in the future. At the moment, Cain is leading so they are after him. They chased Palin around the country and planted a junk journalist in the house next to hers and she is not even running. When Bachman made a good showing they started the rumor that her husband is gay and they claimed she fostered 23 kids just for the money the state provides for such services. When Perry was doing well they uncovered the Niggerhead rock at an old hunting lease and claimed Perry is a racist. They have hated Newt since 1994. Yet, they love Mix and Match Mitt.
My first instinct is to suspect Romney operatives, because Romney feels Hermans hot breath on the back of his neck already. I would also not rule out Perry opertives since Cain is the biggest obstruction in his path.
Why? They in particular and conservatives in general have no history of dirty politics. We often wish they would beat the Democrats at their own game but they don't.
You have only been a Freeper for a couple of months but stick around and learn about liberals and conservatives.
Ann is correct.
I must agree, and I may be new here but I do know enough about liberals and listening to Rush this morning I am now tending to believe it could be liberals. They probably do not want Cain to get too far ahead of “moderate” Romney. The primaries are coming fast and furious, and we are only weeks away from knowing who will be the last man/woman standing.
If liberals are behind this, it still makes no sense because it would be much more powerful impact story in October 2012 if Cain was the nominee. But they would much rather run against Romney which takes attacks on Obamacare off the table since Romney is the biological father of it. So then it would make sense to try and take Cain out right now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.