I loved the History Channel program that reviewed and debunked the conspiracy theories. They covered the theory that WTC 7 was destroyed by the CIA to wipe out some files that were stored in their. An investigator asked if they really believed the CIA has no other method for destroying files than destroying an entire building. The theory sounds really stupid when phrased that way.
posted on 11/01/2011 12:53:21 PM PDT
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
The better question sounds even worse: do they really believe the CIA has no better method for destroying files than destroying four planes to destroy four buildings (two of which were in a different region) in hopes that one of them might fall onto the target (fifth) building and maybe manage to destroy the files.
Yet another indication you should stop watching TV: when you conclude Occam’s Razor (to wit “the simplest answer is right”) never applies.
posted on 11/01/2011 12:59:33 PM PDT
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
“I loved the History Channel program that reviewed and debunked the conspiracy theories.”
Apparently, they’ve matured since airing “The Men Who Killed Kennedy.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson