Skip to comments.Cain
Posted on 11/02/2011 7:05:00 PM PDT by fightinJAG
[snip] I cant understand why our side is giving the Politico/Cain story any sunlight.
Im not a Cain guy. There is a lot to like about him, and I could easily see myself voting for him against President Obama which is the same thing I say about several of the GOP candidates, none of whom has won me over yet. But this sorry Politico episode seems to me to have little to do with Cain and everything to do with how content we are to live in the Lefts world.
This controversy is the perfect storm of (a) media hypocrisy: given the bar set by Clinton/Edwards/Ted Kennedy/et al., the worst possible case of what Cain is accused of if you draw every conceivable negative inference against him doesnt come close to being a story, yet the lefty media energetically dig into Cain after having buried the exponentially worse Democrat scandals; (b) the special bulls-eye fitted on black conservatives: their example of self-reliance and independent thinking makes them such a threat to the social justice narrative that, when it comes to destroying them, anything goes; (c) sexual harassment: a social-engineering caprice the arbitrary standards of which can turn routine not admirable, often unsavory, but entirely unremarkable human behavior into legal ruin; and (d) the litigious nanny state: with human life hyper-regulated and legal fees hyper-expensive, ordinary human behavior becomes grist for extortionate lawsuits that parties settle on the cheap because the cost of fighting is prohibitive and later, these parties end up sounding like jackasses if asked about the suits, at least in part because, if you say something strong in your defense, you risk violating the standard reciprocal confidentiality provision and thus reopening the whole expensive, embarrassing business.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
It really makes you wonder. By all accounts he is an extremely decent productive human being. He is transmogrified into a grasping sex fiend. Verifiable, documented grasping sex fiends are transmogrified into senior statesmen.
Our “reality” is obviously being manipulated. And if you dare to admit this is happening you are a black helicopter conspiracy theorist.
The leftists are the right hand of El Diablo. What they are doing to Herman Cain borders on the criminal of personal harrassment.
Herman Cain will prevail and his enemies will be put to shame.
If the worst accusation is 100% true:
Cain: Wow, you are cute! Wanna come back to my room?
But I have seen black helicopters.......
I could not agree with you more.
I, for one, absolutely refuse to be lead around like cattle any ****ing longer.
I am not even watching media any longer, and Sean Hannity is about to get the X too. Tired of hearing about it, tired of hearing morons talk about it.
It doesn’t matter at all.
Where are those Media Matters voices that are always saying Politico is middle of the road?
You are wise grass hopper.
Couldn’t have said it better myself, in a million years. The media has the right chasing it’s tails on every accusation and protecting the left on any hardproof of same.
The right needs to go into every interview with comparisons of the media’s disingenuous accusations until the msm won’t invite them anymore. Maybe then the populace will realize their treason.
"I like Cain, but I disapprove of his behavior," as if the fact that he has been accused of something pretty much makes it irrelevant whether he did or not.
And the accusation is that he made a couple of neurotic women "uncomfortable."
He made them "uncomfortable?"
WTF? And there are idiots who take this seriously, because it comes from state-controlled media?
Whatchoo say. The Left creates the reality that suits them on the fly. That's why the have to own the media: because "three newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonettes."
But, maybe if we dig around, we can find two thousand of them and solve this freaking problem for a while.
The problem is that if this is way the Hermster rolls then there are going to be a bunch of nice ladies who said yes.
Cain is going to have to deal with this weakness or whatever he wants to call it. Avoiding it is just asking for further eruptions later on and it will sink him. I hope he can sort this out with his wife and continue with his campaign. We can’t let the dims and RINO’s pick our candidates.
“the lefty media energetically dig into Cain after having buried the exponentially worse Democrat scandals”
A bunch of contemptible jackals is what they are. Oops, now I need to go and apologize to contemptible jackals everywhere, having insulted them so unfairly by comparing them to the leftist media.
I think more see this than you think. Take heart.
That said...Call me Doris Day...but I think a lot of normal, everyday voters...the ones that didn't think too much about specifics and reality...Have had reality to deal with in the last 3 years.
This crap smear of Cain will play out. Yes...by all accounts (except the nameless harassed women), Cain is decent. Smart. Kind. Funny. Dealt with massive obstacles...yet came out with a positive attitude.
This—THIS—the MSM is hot upon?
Salacious stuff. If that is what they think very important they would have gone after Mr. Obama’s love interests at Man's Country, Frist, Kal Penn, R. Love....etc., etc.
I still have hope for Cain. I see he is in for the ride of his life. He looks to be a decent man. I'm behind him until there is proof that he is not. I am disgusted how they (whoever “they”) are have gone at him.
People are watching now. I always think it a positive when Conservative ideas find their ways to those just starting to think about these big ideas.
From your lips to God’s ears.
He doesn't have the years of learning the political acumen that a Mitt, Newt or Perry may possess.
If my reputation were being ruined by verbal character assassination and my family, especially my grandchildren, having to witness this circus I'd be fighting mad.
Mr. Cain is a black American who was born and raised in the South. He made it in America because of his intelligence, hard work and perseverance.
Take a look at the facts - these are white, liberal journalists taking pot shots at a black, conservative businessman, striving to make our Country a better place for all of us.
Where is the NAACP, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson when you have “whitey”, (including Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kriston and Brit Hume) trying to take Herman Cain back to the Plantation? MIA of course!
Hannity disappointed me today. He was playing right into this Theater of the Absurd by claiming “we don’t know what happened” and similar non-relevant garbage.
We DO know what happened.
Complaints were made. They were investigated. They were found unsubstantiated. No action was taken against Mr. Cain. The accusers were terminated from their employment, with the usual severance pay and a confidentiality agreement.
END OF DISCUSSION.
It’s like this:
Fifteen years ago you were cited for DUI.
The case was investigated and the judge found there was no evidence that you had been DUI. The citation was dismissed before the case even went to trial.
Moreover, the cop who made the citation against you was terminated, given a severance pay, and he entered into a confidentiality agreement.
Today, fifteen years later, you are running for office. Someone leaks to the press that you were once CITED for DUI. You confirm that you were CITED for DUI. You AND THE MEDIA (in the Cain case, Politico) also confirm that:
1. The citation was dimissed as unsubstantiated.
2. The accuser was terminated.
3. The accuser entered into a confidentiality agreement. Now the accuser, the cop, wants to be released from his confidentiality agreement so he can “tell his side of the story” — the same facts (unless he lies) that he told the judge, that the judge found insufficient, and upon which the case was dismissed and you were exonerated.
That means NOTHING in terms of the validity and precedent of the previous findings by the judge upon a contemporaneous investigation into the facts and the accuser’s account.
NOTHING real or reliable could come out of the cop being allowed to say, literally, whatever he wants at this time — no matter how many people he wants to drag into the matter, no matter how impossible it is to collaborate or refute ANYTHING he says.
Why do some conservatives fall for this crap? It’s embarrassing.
Again, this is exactly why there are statutes of limitations in legal cases. The law says that after a certain amount of time has passed, the testimony of witnesses is no longer reliable.
Shouldn’t we be smart enough — not to mention politically savvy enough — to understand how this same rationale applies here?
Again, if you want to ding Cain because someone made a complaint against him, that’s your call. But please don’t clamor for the debacle of the Jerry Springer-ization of our nomination process. The Left is doing enough to try to destroy conservatives without conservatives going “celebrity crime” crazy over a complaint that was investigated and dismissed more than a decade ago
I’ve been flown in black heli...ahhh....well, I...disregard my last!
Ok he is not handling this well. But what he is not handling is being grabbed by the throat by a mad dog and shaken like a doll.
Should we stand back and critique his lack of ability to fend off mad dogs?
Or should we stand up and say back off you miserable mad dog.
The Left, through the infamous Equal Opportunity Employment Commission and their buddies in the trial lawyer bar, create this culture where employers would rather pay someone a few months salary severance (a, gasp!, five-figure settlement), or even millions of dollars, to get rid of them than have to fight blatantly false charges.
Then, when it suits them (i.e., when the target is, say, NOT Bill Clinton), the Left uses the fact of these shut up settlements as a political bludgeon to say, see, that man, that company must be awful, someone actually made a SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIM against him!!
But do yourself a favor and skip the vanity article. Just read the comments and chime in.
So have I . . .
I think I’ll just go ahead and say it. No predictions on whether it will doom him or not, but ...
The reason this story has legs now is simple. He was not consistent with his message. Didn’t know. Agreement vs. settlement. Did know.
He knew it was coming and didn’t just say “yes, I knew about the settlements; the allegations against me are baseless, and they were severanced from the NRA with x number of weeks pay. As is typical with all severance agreements, there is a non-disclosure clause, and I will respect that.”
Simple, true, and verifiable.
A presidential candidate who does not know that inconsistent responses to the media are like blood in the water? Who is advising him?
I don’t see that Herman Cain is “avoiding” anything.
There’s just not much to say.
The complaints were investigated and found unsubstantiated. The accusers were terminated and, as usual, given severance pay.
That is all.
To the extent that other alleged anonymous “accusers” are coming forward, well, golly, this is the political silly season.
I think I head Hannity say today or yesterday, “Hermain Cain should have said I cannot talk about this because I am bound by the confidentiallty agreement, and they would have ended it, for now”.
WTF does that even mean Sean? Seems all all those stupid idiots you talk to and subject me to on your show are starting to rub off on you big time...
I agree and had to turn him off this afternoon. His tone was such that he was giving the allegations credibility.
We could take a lesson from the left when these things happen and just ignore it, don't report it and don't talk about it.
Gee, I thought by now people would realize the Left always use what they do against decent people and that seems to go for the RINOS too. They have the worst of all, Bill Clinton the rapist.
We are not dealing with facts and law now. This is gossip and character assassination. Cain needs to get in front of this and admit some indiscretions or however he wants to frame it. Otherwise these orchestrated eruptions will continue until he is damaged beyond repair.
I so agree. We should be discussing what the candidates really stand for.
We’re our own worst enemy, time and again.
Who is advising Cain on these matters? Any attorney will advise clients not to discuss the case with anyone but them. And being the case is closed, and he is running for public office that advice should apply even more so. He is doing what comes natural, trying to explain his way out of it one interview at a time, yet doing so puts him at high risk implicating himself, and the more he talks about it the more likely a innocent inconsistency between statements will plant the seed of doubt. From day one, he should of directed all questions to his attorney.
I seriously like Cain, but he needs to stop discussing this right away with the public, and have a talk with his attorney.
Great advice for Cain on this video - You have the Right to Remain Silent - DO IT
Remember, when the trial lawyers were probing the new and lucrative 'harrassment' angle, almost anything could be considered 'harassment'. (They were still feeling out the limits of how much could be made off of what.)
The initial stories (being wiped out by the headlines) claimed in the text there was nothing overt, but the women in question 'felt uncomfortable', whatever that entails.
In short, it was a question of how they took the comment or gesture, not one of how it was intended.
As a business owner, I would have been glad to be rid of people who were going to create trouble at the drop of a hat. No organization can function effectively walking on eggshells. A settlement and non-disclosure agreement beats what may have been a lawsuit with a real hefty price tag in the future if someone had made a remark they could really get traction with, just as a strategic move.
I think this crap was blown out of proportion to begin with, and that is just getting worse.
In the meantime, we have Fast and Furious and all the other DOJ and associated taxpayer-funded firearm deliveries to criminals, we have the milking of huge (half-billion dollar) taxpayer funded loans to failing businesses which continued to fail--at our expense--with political connections and disappearing dollars, we have a national economy in the toilet, the Euro on its way down the pipe, and a host of other, literally earth-shaking developments and they are using the airtime to pump this?
If someone had some facts instead of all the inuendo and supposition, they might have a story.
As for the puke-licking minions of the MSM, they have managed to drop below the 'Bat Boy' credibility level with me. If they told me the sky is blue, I'd have to go check.
So far we have the FACTS that allegations were made, they were investigated and found unsubstantiated, the case was closed without action against Cain (he was exonerated), and the accusers were terminated from their employment, with the usual severance pay and the usual confidentiality agreements.
So, again: what indiscretions?
There is nothing more for Cain to say about this incident. He should say he has responded to it and move on.
Of course, and I’m sure you agree, IF (big IF) the incident in fact impugns the candidate’s character or conduct, then we have to count that against him.
But if we evaluate the situation and, as here, see the candidate’s character is intact, then we need to drop it and move on.
One of the accusers now says she *thinks* Cain is lying:
How much more evidence do you want?
Agreement v. settlement? Are you serious?
First of all, how would Cain know this? He was NOT a party to the action between the complainants and the NRA. He would only know through some kind of hearsay.
Further, this case was so inconsequential and business-as-usual that (1) the HR director at the time said she was unfamiliar with any complaints having been filed against Cain, and (2) the lawyer for the complainant said he couldn't remember her name, or WHO the complaint had been against, that he had accomplished the case with a few phone calls and that was it.
These type of terminations happen EVERY DAY. No one would pay the least bit of attention to it. Especially since there is also evidence that the woman was likely to leave or be fired anyway.
If she doesn't know, there really is nothing to see here.
Yep. From the article:
“She is offended by Cain’s proclamations that he was falsely accused and thinks he is lying.”
Have you ever seen anything so bizarre?
Amen. It’s fodder for fools.
Like complaints that Sarah Palin spent a whopping 150,000 on clothes for a campaign (which she donated to charity)... when the wookie takes multimillion dollar vacations without so much as a peep.
There is not even a pretext of honest or intelligent reporting out there from the MSMinistry of Propaganda, and Fox has been sliding toward that abyss, especially since Beck left.
Frankly, we need a POTUS who can say "If that offends you, tough!" instead of globe-trotting and bowing and scraping to everyone.
You’re right - I agree with that exception
Please note the similar treatment Cain is receiving now to what Palin was subject to the last 2 years...and the common thread behind both becomes clear. This is a bipartisan lynching courtesy of the RinoCracy.
We the People are only to be allowed certain candidates....
I’m a human resources guy career wise so I am well aware of how these things work. The agreement vs settlement talk were Cain’s words not mine.
Stop shooting the messenger.
Cain’s response has been inconsistent. That is undeniable. I’m sorry, but how could he not have been prepared. The guy who he suggests told the Perry camp about used to work for Cain. And I believe I read/heard than it was Cain himself who told the leaker.
“So, again: what indiscretions?”
FRiend, don’t shoot the messenger. It’s obvious from all the gossip Herm has been stepping out on his wife. The stories and innuendo are only going to make this more sordid. He needs to own up to it and move on with his campaign.
Disagreeing with a post, challenging it, or simply asking questions or for clarification or elaboration does not constitute “shooting the messenger.”