Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Members to Super Committee: GO BIG (40 RINOS join 60 RATS)
U.S. House Representative Mark Simpson (R-ID) ^ | 11/2/11 | Mark Simpson (R-ID)

Posted on 11/03/2011 6:17:17 AM PDT by harpu

Members to Super Committee: GO BIG

Washington, Nov 2 -

Congressmen Mike Simpson (R-ID) and Heath Shuler (D-NC) are leading a 100-Member strong bipartisan effort to send a simple but important message to the Joint Select Committee on the Deficit Reduction, known as the Super Committee: Go Big. The 100 bipartisan Members of Congress sent a letter to the Super Committee with the simple and direct message that everything should be on the table and the goal should be closer to $4 trillion rather than the $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction required under the Budget Control Act.

“This letter is signed by conservative, moderate, and liberal members of the House, and while their political philosophies may differ, they all understand the urgency that our national debt crisis represents. They understand that the Super Committee represents our best, and possibly only, chance to make the real reforms needed to return our country to fiscal health,” said Simpson. “I commend Representative Shuler for his tireless efforts to gather support for this letter. Heath understands that this is the time to act, and the respect he has among his colleagues and his ability to build consensus have made him a crucial partner in this important effort.”

“I am so proud of all of my colleagues who signed this letter for their courage to put country before political parties and do what is right for the fiscal future of our nation,” said Rep. Shuler (D-NC). “Many believed the House could never come together to provide the real solutions and leadership our nation needs to get on a fiscally sustainable path. We are here today to show that we can. I applaud Representative Simpson for his hard work and steadfast determination to make this bipartisan effort successful. He is a visionary leader and true statesman, and we need more people like him in Congress.”

The text of the letter is as follows:

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

The Honorable Jeb Hensarling The Honorable Patty Murray

Co-Chair, Joint Select Committee on Co-Chair, Joint Select Committee on

Deficit Reduction Deficit Reduction

129 Cannon House Office Building 448 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20510

Dear Congressman Hensarling, Senator Murray, and Members of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction,

We write to you as a bipartisan group of representatives from across the political spectrum in the belief that the success of your committee is vital to our country’s future. We know that many in Washington and around the country do not believe we in the Congress and those within your committee can successfully meet this challenge. We believe that we can and we must.

To succeed, all options for mandatory and discretionary spending and revenues must be on the table. In addition, we know from other bipartisan frameworks that a target of some $4 trillion in deficit reduction is necessary to stabilize our debt as a share of the economy and assure America’s fiscal well-being.

Our country needs our honest, bipartisan judgment and our political courage. Your committee has been given a unique opportunity and authority to act. We are prepared to support you in this effort.

Sincerely,

1. Andrews (D-NJ)

2. Barrow (D-GA)

3. Bass (R-NH)

4. Bishop, Tim (D-NY)

5. Boren (D-OK)

6. Boswell (D-IA)

7. Cardoza (D-CA)

8. Carney (D-DE)

9. Carter, John (R-TX)

10. Castor (D-FL)

11. Chandler (D-KY)

12. Cleaver (D-MO)

13. Coble (R-NC)

14. Cole (R-OK)

15. Connolly (D-VA)

16. Cooper (D-TN)

17. Costa (D-CA)

18. Crenshaw (R-FL)

19. Cuellar (D-TX)

20. Davis (D-IL)

21. DeFazio (D-OR)

22. DeGette (D-CO)

23. Dent (R-PA)

24. Dicks (D-WA)

25. Dold (R-IL)

26. Duncan (R-TN)

27. Emerson (R-MO)

28. Fattah (D-PA)

29. Fitzpatrick (R-PA)

30. Fortenberry (R-NE)

31. Garamendi (D-CA)

32. Gosar (R-AZ)

33. Grimm (R-NY)

34. Hanna (R-NY)

35. Harper (R-MS)

36. Higgins (D-NY)

37. Himes (D-CT)

38. Hoyer (D-MD)

39. Kelly, Mike (R-PA)

40. Kildee (D-MI)

41. Kind (D-WI)

42. King, Peter (R-NY)

43. Kingston (R-GA)

44. Larsen (D-WA)

45. Larson (D-CT)

46. LaTourette (R-OH)

47. Lipinski (D-IL)

48. Loebsack (D-IA)

49. Long (R-MO)

50. Lummis (R-WY)

51. Maloney (D-NY)

52. Marino (R-PA)

53. Matheson (D-UT)

54. McIntyre (D-NC)

55. McKinley (R-WV)

56. Meehan (R-PA)

57. Meeks (D-NY)

58. Moran (D-VA)

59. Nunes (R-CA)

60. Owens (D-NY)

61. Pascrell (D-NJ)

62. Paul, Ron (R-TX)

63. Perlmutter (D-CO)

64. Peters (D-MI)

65. Peterson (D-MN)

66. Petri (R-WI)

67. Pingree (D-ME)

68. Platts (R-PA)

69. Polis (D-CO)

70. Price, David (D-NC)

71. Quigley (D-IL)

72. Rahall (D-WV)

73. Reed, Tom (R-NY)

74. Ribble (R-WI)

75. Roe (R-TN)

76. Rooney (R-FL)

77. Ross, Mike (D-AR)

78. Rothman (D-NJ)

79. Ruppersberger (D-MD)

80. Schiff (D-CA)

81. Schrader (D-OR)

82. Schwartz (D-PA)

83. Sewell (D-AL)

84. Shuler (D-NC)

85. Simpson (R-ID)

86. Smith, Adam (D-WA)

87. Stutzman (R-IN)

88. Sullivan (R-OK)

89. Terry (R-NE)

90. Thompson, Mike (D-CA)

91. Tsongas (D-MA)

92. Turner, Bob (R-NY)

93. Visclosky (D-IN)

94. Walz (D-MN)

95. Watt (D-NC)

96. Welch (D-VT)

97. Whitfield (R-KY)

98. Wolf (R-VA)

99. Yarmuth (D-KY)

100. Young (R-AK)

###


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: debt; rino; taxincreases
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2011 6:17:18 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpu

I knew something was coming.

Frank Wolf (RINO-VA) was on the house floor railing against Norquist and the tax pledge a couple weeks ago.


2 posted on 11/03/2011 6:19:02 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
The Honorable Patty Murray

You misspelled "scumbucket".

3 posted on 11/03/2011 6:19:33 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

I still like Buffet’s solution for deficit reduction the best: Any year in which there is a budget deficit, all of the members of the current House and Senate may not run for reelection.

How long do you think it would take to fix the deficit with this in place?


4 posted on 11/03/2011 6:23:46 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Notice Buffet has no mention of a President being able to run for reelection after the ruination of the economy by a 1.5 trillion dollar deficit directly from his policies and spending.

Yep...must be Congress. Our new House is taking the bruising for four years of Democratic catastrophe, and I cringe every time I hear someone bagging on ‘congress’. This is the new meme to take out our new majority and many of the recently elected tea party inspired members.


5 posted on 11/03/2011 6:27:08 AM PDT by ilgipper (Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpu

We the people are NOT willing to bail out our failed politicians and their hair brained schemes...I say sell off Washington to chip away at the debt..and block the federal G from raising any money, state balanced budget requirements would give DC surplus for specific programs...tie the beast up tight


6 posted on 11/03/2011 6:27:58 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Smokescreen for raising taxes and fair share mental mentality.

When Dems sign a cost cutting pledge, it is only to effect higher taxes to “spread the pain”.

Perhaps the SuperCommittee of American Citizens needs to “Occupy the Capitol” if these birdbrains don’t get the job done.

Occupation can work two ways.


7 posted on 11/03/2011 6:30:43 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I would add a rider - “Elected and appointed officials get paid out of what’s left over after the other bills are paid.”


8 posted on 11/03/2011 6:30:50 AM PDT by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Guess I’m not seeing the problem here, other than the fact the SuperDuper Central Committee exists because the RINOs caved.

$4T of the right types of cuts will save the country. If, IF the republicans can continue to expound upon their tiny spurt of spinal growth and take a lesson from the last election cycle, we may just get the cuts we want.


9 posted on 11/03/2011 6:31:01 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aces
I say sell off Washington to chip away at the debt.

Washington was sold off decades ago. That's what got us into the debt problem to begin with.

10 posted on 11/03/2011 6:35:46 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nickname
When the GOP agreed to the debt commission, military cut triggers— it showed they were not serious about the debt. Tax increases are coming along with inflation, higher costs for heating, food and basics.

Given to us by both parties. Crazy given the amount of waste and stealing in the stimulus bill, the devaluation of the dollar.

11 posted on 11/03/2011 6:36:15 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: biggerten
“Elected and appointed officials get paid out of what’s left over after the other bills are paid.”

Good idea!

12 posted on 11/03/2011 6:44:01 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Wake Up And Donate!


Click The Pic

Let's Make The Bar Yellow!

13 posted on 11/03/2011 6:46:09 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
From the letter

To succeed, all options for mandatory and discretionary spending and revenues must be on the table.

Revenues = increase in taxes. A Democrat on cable news this morning, was very excited about the willingness of the Republicans to raise revenue. Said it was a big break through.

14 posted on 11/03/2011 6:46:09 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Pubbies couldn’t even come up with $100 Billion in cuts they promised pre-election, so where are they intending on finding $4 Trillion?

Or how far across the decades will they kick that can?


15 posted on 11/03/2011 6:47:25 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
1) Did a quick scan and did not notice any conservative names that I recognized.

2) If Chaka Fattah is a signer it's likely a bad idea.

16 posted on 11/03/2011 6:49:16 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

The biggest concern is that they do nothing and Defense gets whacked for another 600 Billion. That should be the most important thing to avoid!


17 posted on 11/03/2011 6:52:13 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
everything should be on the table

In other words: more/higher taxes.

Wonder who will be called upon to "pay their fair share?"

18 posted on 11/03/2011 6:52:18 AM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Guess I’m not seeing the problem here, other than the fact the SuperDuper Central Committee exists because the RINOs caved. $4T of the right types of cuts will save the country. If, IF the republicans can continue to expound upon their tiny spurt of spinal growth and take a lesson from the last election cycle, we may just get the cuts we want.

They did not say spending cuts, they may be thinking 4T in new tax revenues $4 trillion rather than the $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction
19 posted on 11/03/2011 6:55:42 AM PDT by NoDRodee (U>S>M>C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

Somehow, they will soon have a national sales tax - in addition to the income tax. That way they will get everybody - a fair tax!


20 posted on 11/03/2011 6:56:06 AM PDT by Loud Mime ("Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.” Alexander Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: harpu

It should be automatically assumed that any congressperson recommending “revenue” increases as part of a deficit reduction package has NO intention of cutting spending.


21 posted on 11/03/2011 7:05:23 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

“Everything is on the table” = raise taxes and cut defense. Claim billions in “savings” in welfare/foodstamps by reducing fraud and upgrading computerized systems.


22 posted on 11/03/2011 7:15:47 AM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Et tu Ron Paul?


23 posted on 11/03/2011 7:26:03 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Any year in which there is a budget deficit, all of the members of the current House and Senate may not run for reelection.

Problem 1: The House runs every two years. One third of the Senate runs every two years. So none of them are running for reelection every other year.

Problem 2: The period of when Congress runs for election is fixed by a little thing called the United States Constitution.

Problem 3: Silly, impossible, make-believe fixes are soooo much easier than real, hard choices.

24 posted on 11/03/2011 7:34:00 AM PDT by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Is the super committee like the czars? Even though they are elected; how come they are seem like they are representing the government rather than the people? Is this some new type of government and what is it modeled after?


25 posted on 11/03/2011 7:39:23 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Turner has turned on us! Into a big Weiner!


26 posted on 11/03/2011 7:42:34 AM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: harpu

axxholes! Reducing the deficit by raising taxes is no answer at all. Just more of the same old crap.


27 posted on 11/03/2011 7:56:29 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
"A Democrat on cable news this morning, was very excited about the willingness of the Republicans to raise revenue. Said it was a big break through."

He's going to get served when the Tea Party Caucus joins hands with the Progressives to block this dopey bill.

28 posted on 11/03/2011 8:35:11 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
"The biggest concern is that they do nothing and Defense gets whacked for another 600 Billion."

I agree, but if it comes to that at least Entitlements take an equal percentage hit. It may be that it takes this much constriction to force the States (namely, California) to reel in the freebies. Contraction is inevitable.

29 posted on 11/03/2011 8:39:53 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Members to Super Committee: GO GREECE
30 posted on 11/03/2011 8:48:03 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
1) Did a quick scan and did not notice any conservative names that I recognized.

62. Paul, Ron (R-TX)

Ron Paul would probably like voters to think he's conservative. Now that he's stated that he won't run for re-election, I guess he's done pretending. If we could just get him off the GOP debate stage so that there's more time for serious candidates to speak, that would make me happy.

31 posted on 11/03/2011 8:48:27 AM PDT by lonevoice (The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers, impeach we much. We will much about that be committed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Gives ya a warm feeeling,, right in the old pocketbook.


32 posted on 11/03/2011 8:49:49 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
I don't think that's what he had in mind. What he was saying is that any representative who was in office during any given year is flagged as not being eligible for reelection. Even if we buy your premise, there would be huge pressures to balance the budget every two years at least.
33 posted on 11/03/2011 9:10:18 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Extra-Congressional legislation is illegal.


34 posted on 11/03/2011 9:31:08 AM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

No Washington was bought off, we need to sell it off..


35 posted on 11/03/2011 9:54:14 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Are you surprised?


36 posted on 11/03/2011 10:09:22 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Smokescreen for raising taxes and fair share mental mentality.

Scanning the list of Republican signees, I don't see many recognizably conservative names.

Which makes me suspicious.

Suggesting that this is a "moderate" initiative, a "bi-partisan" effort...to raise taxes.

37 posted on 11/03/2011 10:12:45 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
$4T of the right types of cuts will save the country.

This group of Congressmen -- RINO Republicans and "moderate" Democrats -- probably isn't thinking in terms of "spending cuts".

Instead, they're probably focussed on "tax increases".

38 posted on 11/03/2011 10:14:52 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: harpu
the congress is abdicating their responsibility by forming this committee, and all the people on this committee will be gaining bigger retaierment bucks because they are on this committee, congress needs to do their job and just say no! I bet that if they cut to deep they will be taken to the USSC just like the line item veto and overturned.
39 posted on 11/03/2011 1:53:35 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
congress is abdicating their responsibility

Yep, and all for political expediency. They can go home and tell their constituents "I didn't vote to raise taxes, cut spending, etc., it was the super-committee."
40 posted on 11/03/2011 1:56:04 PM PDT by DTxAg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DTxAg
Every last one of them needs to be charged with fraud for signing us the tax payer into so much debt. If these people were running a business they would be in prison right now.
41 posted on 11/03/2011 2:02:04 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

“the congress is abdicating their responsibility by forming this committee.”

In particular the GOP “leadership”. McConnell, Boehner, Cantor, etc.


42 posted on 11/03/2011 4:06:37 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Pure bums...bums.


43 posted on 11/03/2011 6:40:52 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: harpu

#49, Billy Long, is not a RINO.


44 posted on 11/03/2011 7:20:19 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

They’d just fix the deficit by raising taxes.


45 posted on 11/03/2011 9:14:23 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789
They’d just fix the deficit by raising taxes.

Yeah, like that would win them reelection. I think voters are just about fed up with federal spending and increasing taxes would produce the same effect as Buffet's idea.

46 posted on 11/03/2011 9:17:19 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Translation: If you are a productive member of society who only wants to work and do what’s best for your family, bend over and grab your ankles. Here come the molesters again.


47 posted on 11/03/2011 9:20:33 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

It’s proof 2010 was meaningless. I feel like the Jack Nicholson Joker in the first Michael Keaton “Batman” movie: “Watch out boys, we’ve been ratted out here!”


48 posted on 11/03/2011 9:25:20 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Romney as president will just destroy the country slower than Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Hey, the super committee is in the Constitution, right after the paragraph on czars, which is just under the section on the abortion penumbra. Mark Levin was saying just that on his radio program yesterday [/s].


49 posted on 11/04/2011 1:57:29 AM PDT by rfp1234 (RFP's Law: Whoever blames Bush first shall lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

“It’s proof 2010 was meaningless.”

Well, 2010 was a step in the right direction, but far too many RINOS are in positions of authority in the GOP leadership. This kind of crap just shows the need for another 2010-type year, but this time we need to primary some of the leadership-starting with Boehner.

And BTW-this is EXACTLY the kind of crap we get with people like Romney. Anybody who sees what’s going on here, is rightly disgusted by it, then still turns around and supports Romney is a complete and total FOOL.


50 posted on 11/04/2011 4:47:33 AM PDT by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson