Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘60 Minutes’ Ambushes… Nancy Pelosi?
Breitbart TV ^ | November 4, 2011 | Breitbart TV

Posted on 11/04/2011 3:19:37 AM PDT by Makana

"60 Minutes" challenged Nancy Pelosi on her conflict of interest while Speaker and facilitating financial reform while being involved with credit card companies.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; ehtics; financialregulation; pelosi
The Queen of Hearts replies "Off with his head!"
1 posted on 11/04/2011 3:19:39 AM PDT by Makana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Makana

How dare they ambush one of the Party elite? Back to the re-education camp.......expecting to hear the replacement with Democrat approved reporter...


2 posted on 11/04/2011 3:23:15 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Maybe the DNC finally realizes how unpopular she is, and wants to push her aside for some new, fresh face only in his sixties.


3 posted on 11/04/2011 3:24:25 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Nancy Pelosi: The #1 reason I want a Constitutional requirement for all members of Congress to submit to random drug testing.


4 posted on 11/04/2011 3:31:12 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Mark Halperin - Learned the hard way what happens when you speak the truth on PMSNBC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

That was The Red Queen. She told Alice to believe in ‘’impossible things’’. “That’s silly’’ said Alice. “no one can believe in impossible things’’. To which The Red Queen responded, “I dare say you haven’t tried’’. “Why when I was your age I could believe in six impossible things before breakfast’’.


5 posted on 11/04/2011 3:42:00 AM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana
And the look on her face was.....

............The same as last week!

6 posted on 11/04/2011 3:44:37 AM PDT by RobertClark ("Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

She looks like she has been ambushed.

She looks like she`s been “rode hard and put up wet”

She has alot of miles on her, and not all on paved roads.


7 posted on 11/04/2011 3:44:58 AM PDT by Einherjar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

There is no way this woman is clean. Look at her mouth constantly twitching when she isn’t speaking: Classic symptom of cocaine/amphetamine usage. Also the eyes bugging out which is another symptom, although that can be attributed to a face lift, but I doubt it in this case. Anybody wants to drive her up the wall, she should be questioned about this. She thinks nobody notices? Surprise the b*tch, put her on the spot.


8 posted on 11/04/2011 3:53:52 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Mark Halperin - Learned the hard way what happens when you speak the truth on PMSNBC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Maybe 60 Minutes egos are attacking Pelosi for Hussein. I am betting Hussein would, if his Fraud machine succeeds next year, LOVE to install Debbie Wasserschmuck Ditz as the Speaker. Deb is an obedient Hussein poodle and is Jewish to boot! Hussein may be working to make Nasty Pelosi damaged goods.

Hell, it isn’t like he is in danger of losing San Francisco’s votes.

Just a thought.


9 posted on 11/04/2011 3:56:48 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana; All

Her reply was about as clear as the water in Boston Harbor. She was definitely caught off guard by this.


10 posted on 11/04/2011 3:57:31 AM PDT by no dems (Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Add up the numbers....still a significant win for the house Republicans in 2012, and a 52-member Republican Senate very likely. If this were a NFL team...you’d say a rebuilding effort is necessary. Your lame old quarterback needs to go, and even if it’s a dismal adios to the old quarterback....it’s necessary for the need to rebuild and look toward 2016. So I think the big outsiders who support the DNC have told 60 Minutes to go ahead and start carving off her support.

I’m guessing Nancy is going around the DNC and trying to find out who encouraged 60 Minutes and CBS to take her down. Everybody is mostly grinning, and lacking an answer.


11 posted on 11/04/2011 3:58:46 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

A witch hunting witches.


12 posted on 11/04/2011 4:09:51 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Makana

And she claims the House is “in play”. The ads should write themselves...’Do you want THIS back as Speaker???’


13 posted on 11/04/2011 4:14:14 AM PDT by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Nancy Pelosi: The #1 reason I want a Constitutional requirement for all members of Congress to submit to random drug testing.

Nancy Pelosi is an effective advocate for the leftist degenerates from the progressive cesspool that she represents. The varmits who elect her year after year are the ones that we need to drug test.

14 posted on 11/04/2011 4:16:18 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Nancy Pelosi: The #1 reason I want a Constitutional requirement for all members of Congress to submit to random drug testing.

...all well and good, until one considers just how much good an oath before God and the people, to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, has done to keep our government safe from the Thugs, Communists, crooks, deviants, dumb, and delinquent, that reside there with impunity.


15 posted on 11/04/2011 4:16:47 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

“degenerates”

Thanks, I forgot degenerates, and probably quite a few others.


16 posted on 11/04/2011 4:23:22 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I actually laugh when I see Pelosi these days. I used to be really annoyed, now she’s the Democrats’s crazy aunt, their Miss Havisham. She shows up thinking she’s still young, that she’s the belle of the ball, and because she has a microphone that she somehow EARNED the right to have an opinion on anything other than the best Botox salons in Napa Valley. Then she stammers out these bon mots of hers, and people just look perplexed in the room, while out here in ‘flyover country’ we think “What a crazed fossil, who do I vote for that she won’t like?”


17 posted on 11/04/2011 4:25:08 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
she’s the Democrats’s crazy aunt, their Miss Havisham

...sitting in her dusty, unlit office... cobwebs covering the oversized "prop" gavel that has been sitting undisturbed on her desk since November of 2010...

That or their Nora Desmond.

Mr. niteowl77

18 posted on 11/04/2011 4:39:19 AM PDT by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77
That or their Nora Desmond.

"Max, they confused me with Nancy Pelosi. Hurt them, Max."

19 posted on 11/04/2011 4:45:07 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("To Serve Manatee" is a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77

“I’m ready for my close-up, Mr. Olbermann.”

While America lies face-down in her wine-filled swimming pool.


20 posted on 11/04/2011 4:46:55 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Savage played the audio of the questioning. Pelosi said that Congress provides “protections” for industries. It was a tacit admission that Congress is in the protection racket business, picking winners and losers depending on who plays ball. As far as substance abuse is concerned, I’m convinced she’s mentally disturbed e.g. crazy.


21 posted on 11/04/2011 5:01:14 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Is Botox a controlled substance?


22 posted on 11/04/2011 5:04:01 AM PDT by Humble Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

LOL!

Comments like this make FR a very interesting place!


23 posted on 11/04/2011 5:12:26 AM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Melt her down and recover the fiberglass...


24 posted on 11/04/2011 5:56:36 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Makana
Any lazy journalist could make a career out of comparing Pelosi’s public statements against herself, and reality.

For too long, this woman has gotten away with making the most ridiculous reality-free public pronouncements. AP assigns an army to fact-check Palin, but won't waste time fact-checking this woman, even when she was speaker of the house.

25 posted on 11/04/2011 6:12:08 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

How stupid does someone have to be to vote for somebody like Nancy Pelosi?


26 posted on 11/04/2011 6:24:55 AM PDT by Savage Beast (A backwoods southern lawyer is a safer trustee for your soul than a Washington politician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
How stupid does someone have to be to vote for somebody like Nancy Pelosi?


27 posted on 11/04/2011 6:28:24 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("To Serve Manatee" is a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wita

So true. They swear to protect and defend it yet as soon as they’re elected they are the ones attacking it, destroying it right off the bat. I look at the 2nd Amendment for example: If I’m not mistaken, it’s the only right in the Constitution that implicitly states “Shall not be infringed”. Has the word “not” taken on some kind of invisibility in the English language? Where somehow these people just skip right over it when reading a sentence? Are they using the Bill Clinton method of dissecting sentences “it depends what is is”? “Oh ‘not” can mean ‘definitely’! Yes, pass the law banning all firearms! the Constitution says ‘Shall definitely be infringed’”?


28 posted on 11/04/2011 8:30:36 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Mark Halperin - Learned the hard way what happens when you speak the truth on PMSNBC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

‘Shall not be infringed’

To the two of us, the Constitution and the oath taken by military and public servants has great meaning. Unfortunately the majority of folks form their own gospel of government, just as they do their gospel of Jesus Christ. Believing what they will, in total disregard of scripture to the contrary.

I’m quite sure the only way that the importance of the founding documents much less the principles on which they were founded, will ever be reestablished as the foundation for the Republic will be, when public trails for treason become more important than the present overwhelming need to abort the next 10 or fifteen generations of Americans.


29 posted on 11/04/2011 10:52:14 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson