Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China: Expressways of Excess (vast overbuilding of transportation infrastructure)
Caixin ^ | 10/31/11 | Yue Zhen

Posted on 11/04/2011 5:57:03 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

By staff reporter Yue Zhen 10.31.2011 18:38

Expressways of Excess

Lu Dadao has long warned about the risks of highway, railway and airport overbuilding, and now people are listening

"Excessive." That's the word Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) academic and National Planning Expert Committee member Lu Dadao uses to describe the scope and pace of transportation-related construction projects in China.

In a recent interview with Caixin, 71-year-old Lu repeated his long-held concerns about the nation's vast transportation building program, referring specifically to a critical report written by a research team he headed and submitted to the central government one year ago.

At that time, Lu said he "faced great pressure" in part because Liu Zhijun was still serving as the nation's powerful minister of railways. Liu was sacked for alleged corruption in February, and his push to build bullet trains was discredited by a deadly collision in July.

The report Lu cited stemmed from a June 2010 initiative by the CAS Faculty Advisory Committee, which issued a report called Recommendations for Avoiding Excessive Transportation Construction in China.

The report's authors argued that sizeable investments in the nation's transportation sector since 1997 had created excess capacity. The gap between supply and demand became even more prominent after the 2008 global financial crisis prompted the Chinese government to push for even more building projects through a 4 trillion yuan economic stimulus package.

Lu and the report's other authors were finally heard after the July 23 collision of two, high-speed trains near Wenzhou killed 40 people. The tragedy prompted the State Council to order a cool-off for bullet train expansion.

The nation's experience with high-speed railways has become a touchstone for reflecting and adjusting to what's been called a perilous "great leap" for transportation development.

(Excerpt) Read more at english.caixin.cn ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; overbuilding; transportation

1 posted on 11/04/2011 5:57:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

P!


2 posted on 11/04/2011 5:57:51 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

And good luck with all of that substandard concrete and rebar.


3 posted on 11/04/2011 6:10:48 AM PDT by Noumenon (The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

We used to have money for public works. Then, we embarked on free trade and now the Chinese have all our money. Boy, is our government stupid!


4 posted on 11/04/2011 6:11:09 AM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Stimulus to nowhere.


5 posted on 11/04/2011 6:22:58 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate. ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

We shouldn’t have “public works” to begin with. Infrastructure construction ought to be entirely privatized.


6 posted on 11/04/2011 6:30:59 AM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
Correct, we shouldn't. But even as early as the 1840’s and 1850’s, in our still young Republic, the railroads were being built thanks to Federal land grants along the right of way.

It would be an interesting debate to decide which lasted longer: the virtues of the Roman Republic or the American Republic.

7 posted on 11/04/2011 6:51:42 AM PDT by hfr (Liberalism is a moral disorder that leads to mental disorder (actually it's sin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China created the greatest freeway system in the world after the US to knit a growing nation together and to ease travel around a country in which prior to the 1980s, few people ever left their village. Its the concrete expression of China’s ditching of Maoism, with the ideological belief China should remain poor and equal than rich and powerful. Yes, the Communist Party is the ultimate power. But there is a vast and growing Chinese middle class and the question is when not if China will someday transition to democratic rule. This can’t be rushed.


8 posted on 11/04/2011 7:17:49 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

When I was a college freshman back in 1963, my economics professor waxed long and poetic about the amazing economic development of the USSR under their enlightened communist system. Then in the 1980’s, we were told how the brilliant Japanese were buying up America and would dominate the world of the future.

Both examples show the value of predictions, but I will make one anyway. In 20 years, China will be an economic basket case. By then, the US will have passed through a dark time of violence and chaos and will have re-emerged as the worlds moral and economic leader.


9 posted on 11/04/2011 7:20:57 AM PDT by tickmeister (tickmeister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The tragedy prompted the State Council to order a cool-off for bullet train expansion.

Somewhere, Willie Green softly weeps.

10 posted on 11/04/2011 7:28:38 AM PDT by denydenydeny (The moment you step into a world of facts, you step into a world of limits. --Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I’ve been to mainland China several times over the years as a tourist. On each return, I was impressed by the new modern highways and traffic interchanges in and near the large cities. They may have overdone it with some of the high speed train lines but, I don’t think the roads and bridges are excessive.

Good surface transportation is important for business development. It gets goods to railheads and ports. We tourists like good roads as we spend a lot of time on buses. I also have been to India and its roads are very bad. Little is being done in India to keep up or build roads. They are letting the good train system the British built for them decline too. India will have trouble growing its economy without good roads and rails.


11 posted on 11/04/2011 7:36:30 AM PDT by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

Alone.


12 posted on 11/04/2011 7:18:07 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

LOL. That’s a bad thing?


13 posted on 11/06/2011 4:08:49 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hfr

We need a James J. Hill and something similar to the development of the Great Northern Railway.


14 posted on 11/06/2011 4:10:37 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson