"Since Oct 11, 2011"
Sniff.
Posted on 11/07/2011 7:20:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind
RE: You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain’s feet.
_____________________
I am not a Cainiac by any means. Let the best candidate be the nominee.
But I take exception to your charge that cain supporters “you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past”.
Before people (Cainiacs or non-Cainiacs included) conclude that he has a sullied past, LET’s LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.
THAT’s ALL WE ARE ASKING. WHERE IS IT?
And yeah, I am open to the idea that he may have had a sullied past ( no one is perfect ). But I sure as Hell DEMAND EVIDENCE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT before Icome to such a conclusion.
If you have such evidence we are all ears....
RE: You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain’s feet.
_____________________
I am not a Cainiac by any means. Let the best candidate be the nominee.
But I take exception to your charge that cain supporters “you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past”.
Before people (Cainiacs or non-Cainiacs included) conclude that he has a sullied past, LET’s LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.
THAT’s ALL WE ARE ASKING. WHERE IS IT?
And yeah, I am open to the idea that he may have had a sullied past ( no one is perfect ). But I sure as Hell DEMAND EVIDENCE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT before Icome to such a conclusion.
If you have such evidence we are all ears....
RE: You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain’s feet.
_____________________
I am not a Cainiac by any means. Let the best candidate be the nominee.
But I take exception to your charge that cain supporters “you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past”.
Before people (Cainiacs or non-Cainiacs included) conclude that he has a sullied past, LET’s LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.
THAT’s ALL WE ARE ASKING. WHERE IS IT?
And yeah, I am open to the idea that he may have had a sullied past ( no one is perfect ). But I sure as Hell DEMAND EVIDENCE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT before Icome to such a conclusion.
If you have such evidence we are all ears....
RE: That may encourage them to come out
Actually I am all FOR their coming out.
If they have anything to say I want them to PRESENT IT IN THE OPEN, instead of speaking in riddles through a lawyer.
Until they do and until we can prove that they’re telling the truth. Cain is innocent of the charge.
You make an easy target, troll. Your slimy partisan insinuations are not befitting FR.
Can't ask for more than that. We saw how this circus works years ago with Clarence Thomas. And we know the left is a creature of habit - if something worked against a black conservative years ago, they will try it again now. So to me, they are going to have to come out with something a lot stronger than Politico innuendo and a press conference with a well-know liberal hack lawyer.
The women might be telling the truth, but so far I have not seen anything approaching the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence, and as accusers, that burden is on them. Most of the folks chiming in about Cain's probable guilt on these threads already have a recent history of their own partisan posting on FR, so we know what they are about.
So let's recap - we have politically motivated posters picking up a well-worn liberal hatchet and asking us to believe that their motives are pure and sincere and they are only after the truth as they swing that bloody hatchet back and forth - all the while calling posters names who are pointing out that they are indeed swinging a well-worn liberal hatchet.
That dog don't hunt around here. Heck, even the fleas won't bite it.
I do.
Interesting that she didn’t tell her boyfriend about this until a few days ago. Odd.
Sniff.
Bachmann and the rest are not even in the running any longer, yet they continue to scarf up campaign donations, that they will keep making themselves even richer, because that money will follow them when they leave office.
May their days be long, and may their days in office BE FEW!
I am of a mind to vote 90% of both houses out. What BOTH parties are planning to do to our Military breaks my heart.
Any congress critter or president who FAILS to keep faith with the Military, WON'T keep faith with YOU!
Ret. Senior Chief's wife.
Puh-leeze, don't take your frustration out on Michele Bachmann. There's no reason to think she won't keep faith with the military, if that's what bothers you about her. She's also not RINO nor is she in with La Raza.
When and if she drops out of the presidential race, she will likely put her contributions to good use by running for re-election to her House seat and representing her district well.
No she is no RINO, but she is not up to going toe to toe with Potus and Totus. In 10 years she will have the viability to do so, but not today, the press has demonized her as ditzy when she has simply gotten a few facts wrong or miss stated them.
But the other two males are nothing but plastic ken dolls, mouthing the right words, while NOT walking those words. We have tracked them long enough to know they are NOT truly what they say they are. The rest of the field is unknown out side their own states.
I would have rather had Alan West.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.