Skip to comments.Chicago TEA Party Lead Activist on Sharon Bialek...
Posted on 11/07/2011 1:43:38 PM PST by justsaynomore
by Political Arena Editor Chuck Norton
When Sharon Bialek said that he was with Herman Cain at the Chicago TEA Party event with Herman Cain I reached out to one of the key voices and leaders of the Chicago TEA Party C. Steven Tucker and he says I did not recognize her Chuck and I was there all weekend.
I have been reaching out to my other friends in the Chicago TEA Party and so far no one recognizes her. Gloria Allred portrayed Bialek as a TEA Party Republican. Having seen her picture Bialek is not someone who goes unnoticed easily.
Tucker comments further:
I have spoken at Tea Party events ALL OVER Chicagoland including TeaCon Midwest 2011 where Gloria Allred says her client confronted Herman Cain. I have never seen nor have I ever even heard of a Sharon Bialek.
Steven Tucker with Herman Cain Steven Tucker with Herman Cain
Steven Tucker with Michelle Bachman Steven Tucker with Michelle Bachman
Steven Tucker with Sarah Palin Steven Tucker with Sarah Palin
Bailek has not been seen at any other TEA Party events. Even if she had gone to just one, why go to the one with Herman Cain and no others? It makes no sense.
Sharon Blailek said that this happened in 1996 so where was Blailek when Herman Cain was running for Senate in 2004?
We have been doing internet searches on Sharon Bialek. Her linkedin and all social networking/employer networking sites where her name appears seem to have been scrubbed. When you are telling the truth, why make the attempt to scrub your past?
Speaking of not making sense, why would a supposed Republican TEA Party activist/sympathizer call a known leftist hatchet man like Gloria Allred, as any association with Allred would impune her credibility?
I have no idea whether the woman’s story is true or not and whether she was put up to it or not.
But it makes sense to me that, as she described, she and her boyfriend had quasi-partied with Herman while she still had her job. So after she lost her position, she checked in with him to see if he could find her one elsewhere in the association (or at a state association).
If these charges are false, Cain has to take this woman on and sue her. If the democrats will falsely accuse in this manner and get away with this behaviour without being challenged then the gates are openned on all and any republican, candidate that comes along. Cain has to do more than just deny. His campaign has to sue her and get evidence that she is working for someone in order to ruin his run for Presidency.
Maybe she attended solely as a way to meet up with Cain — which, surprisingly, she succeeded at — as a way to try to leverage her old connection for career help, to get “famous” by being connected with the famous, to shake him down — many things possible here.
He didn’t “take her in,” so to speak.
Within a few weeks/months, she’s trashing him in the media — with a story that, by her own admission, she did not even tell her boyfriend or anyone else the details of at the time, lo more than a decade ago.
Maybe she even got in for free, seeing as she’s connected with the media (radio).
Oh no! I expect them to jump on this and blare all the eensy teensey itty bitty scurrilous facts they can dig up on this woman just like they did with Sarah Palin...............
Unfortunately, however, it is not a moral issue for the media or the Dems.
“manager” who only lasted 6 months on the job before she was fired (not resigned)!!
I am a woman, just older that Ms Bialek. In the mid 90’s IF I had called up one of my old employers while I was visiting from out of town and agreed to meet up with him in my hotel room, I would have been the sexual agressor.
This type of thing wasn’t done in my day, at least without the expectation of a sexual tryst.
I think she set him up then, as her target. He didn’t take the bait.
Or she was sent to the Chicago Tea Party convention for a reason.
She is from Chicago. That is just too, too convenient to be believable.
Filing a lawsuit now could force her to come clean.
Okay, it’s a moral issue. Once again, there’s NO PROOF. Perhaps you’re ready to take a CBS media employee from CHICAGO at her word, who has never brought this issue forth in the 15 years since she says it happened, but I’m not. Cain has repeatedly said these are lies. Why do you assume he’s the liar here? Additionally, her description of the events is very disturbing. Do you honestly think if this happened the way she says it happened, she would have told only 3 people that he harassed her and not speak of the sordid details?
Big Government has spoken with a source who helped organize Teacon 2011 and who confirmed that Sharon Bialek attended, as did Mr. Cain (who was a featured speaker).Whole post can be read here: HERE. Cain needs to get a handle on this, whether it happened or not.
Our source also remembers Ms. Bialek personally, and therefore can confirm that the woman who attended was not a different woman with the same name.
That does not affirm or deny the substance of Ms. Bialeks allegations, nor her account of her interaction with Mr. Cain at Teacon.
I advocated taking all info available into account and then trusting your gut.
I also advocated that people stop applying “innocent until proven guilty” inappropriately. When folks misapply this standard, it demonstrates a major lack of understanding of the fundamentals of our moral AND legal system.
My own gut says she is not credible and Cain is.
Another organizer of that event says there is no record of her being there nor anyone remembering her.
Tea Party event was in October 2011; very recent. I can almost guarantee that she was already working with Allred or some other polical operatives at the time. That event was a planned event/set up to lend credence to her story.
Breitbart’s Big Government site is reporting a source that confirms Ms. Bialek’s attendance at the Schaumberg, IL TEACON 2011 event on 9/30-10/1, 2011. Breitbart was a featured speaker but the event materials on the web do not advertise Cain as a speaker.
Again, this is easlily a set-up by Ms. Bialek’s handlers who were already planning today’s media event.
Talk show host here in ATL is taking her physical account of the events she describes and claiming that Herman must be a sex ninja to be able to pull the maneuvers she describes....
I Am so PISSED that I missed my chance for some of that ninja action!!!
This is where Cain hire attorneys to freeze the backup files on the LinkedIn servers. Additionally, the software operating the site would also leave trails of any changes and when they were made.
Yep, That one was glaring at me as well.
Breitbart is hardly a shill for the other side. If his source turns out to be wrong, he’ll clear it up ASAP. Breitbart has an interest in maintaining his credibility.
Maybe that's how Brietbart has confirmed she was there?
She is Stifler’s mother.
Your example is beyond stupid. Comparing a child molestation charge to a 15 year old he said, she said is ridiculous.
It already stinketh to the high heavens....
NOt accusing them of shilling, it all depends on who the sources of the information is.
Thanks for the smile, eeevil :-)
Oh.. I’m also chatting on IM with a friend who was there and near Cain all the time because he was reporting on the campaign and he doesn’t remember her. He said he is going to pull all his photos and post them online to see if anyone sees her.
Below is from Ancestry.com, cant confirm it is the right person.
Name: S Bialek
Address: 3723 N Magnolia Ave
Zip Code: 60613
ame: Sharon L Bialek
Birth Date: 8 Aug 1961
Phone Number: 283-0532
Address: 5101 W Waveland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60641-3449 (1982)
[474 N Lake Shore Dr Apt 2506, Chicago, IL, 60611-3440 (1994)]
[474 N, Des Plaines, IL, 60016 (1994)]
[2083 Fox Ln, Des Plaines, IL, 60018-4028]
Name: S Bialek
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1961
School: Reavis High School
School Location: Burbank, Illinois
This is bigger than Cain.
If we let the media pick our candidate again, we are no longer a representative Republic. It means we no longer have a vote.
Anyone promoting this obvious attempt to take down a good man, you are aiding the destruction of our Republic.
If you don’t like Cain, let your candidate beat him fair and square. NOT like this. Stand up against this garbage.
Well, as the old saying goes, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” We’ll find out soon enough if this babe is a fraud or not. I never thought Joe Pa’s defensive coordinator could be charged with sodomizing boys, but oh well. Whatever happened/didn’t happen, happened or didn’t happen. We’ll have more evidence—maybe even proof—soon enough. I for one am tired of going out on a limb and pronouncing HOW IT’S ALL JUST GOTTA BE before I get a clear picture of the facts and what those facts mean.
the eeevil part of me really wants to start a thread....
What are YOU willing to do for Herman in order to get a job?
I know, I know...eeevil mind.....
“In that job she has to be making cold calls and reaching out to literally hundreds of people per week, or shed starve.”
If she reached out to me, I would run. She looks like a madam in a $25 cat house.
There are already lots of photos and videos of the event online and so far, she isn’t to be seen.
“...Some are thinking who cares if Cain really did it, lets use it to boost our candidate...”
Even if Herman Cain doesn’t wind up as our candidate, he already IS one of OUR CANDIDATES.
He’s one of us.
We need to start showing the leftards that if they mess with ONE of us, they’ll face ALL of us.
We ought not let him get butchered like this.
For the record, I don’t this bimbo piece of sh*t and her worthless garbage ambulance chasing wh*re of an attorney.
“For the record, I dont believe this bimbo piece of sh*t and her worthless garbage ambulance chasing wh*re of an attorney.”
If she’s a Tea Party Republican, then she’ll have Tea Party Republican friends. Did she go to this TP event alone? Was this the only TP event she attended?
Simple - to establish her story, her credentials, or "alibi" (take your pick) for use later (i.e. at today's press conference).
There were nearly 700 in attendance and 489 votes cast in the straw poll which Cain won with some 77% of the vote...
Looked her up on opensecrets.org I find it odd that a TEA partier would have no record of political donations.
as the old saying goes, Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
No. Absence of evidence is absence of evidence.
Comparing JoePa's defense coordinator's actions here is reprehensible. There were eye witnesses to severe allegations...as in caught in the act, and subsequent cover-up by many. Not. even. close.
I couldn’t of said it better.
“Do you honestly think if this happened the way she says it happened, she would have told only 3 people that he harassed her and not speak of the sordid details?”
If this was factual, she would have started telling friends and neighbors that, “that SOB tried to get into my pants some years back, the dirty bastard”!