Skip to comments.Chicago TEA Party Lead Activist on Sharon Bialek...
Posted on 11/07/2011 1:43:38 PM PST by justsaynomore
by Political Arena Editor Chuck Norton
When Sharon Bialek said that he was with Herman Cain at the Chicago TEA Party event with Herman Cain I reached out to one of the key voices and leaders of the Chicago TEA Party C. Steven Tucker and he says I did not recognize her Chuck and I was there all weekend.
I have been reaching out to my other friends in the Chicago TEA Party and so far no one recognizes her. Gloria Allred portrayed Bialek as a TEA Party Republican. Having seen her picture Bialek is not someone who goes unnoticed easily.
Tucker comments further:
I have spoken at Tea Party events ALL OVER Chicagoland including TeaCon Midwest 2011 where Gloria Allred says her client confronted Herman Cain. I have never seen nor have I ever even heard of a Sharon Bialek.
Steven Tucker with Herman Cain Steven Tucker with Herman Cain
Steven Tucker with Michelle Bachman Steven Tucker with Michelle Bachman
Steven Tucker with Sarah Palin Steven Tucker with Sarah Palin
Bailek has not been seen at any other TEA Party events. Even if she had gone to just one, why go to the one with Herman Cain and no others? It makes no sense.
Sharon Blailek said that this happened in 1996 so where was Blailek when Herman Cain was running for Senate in 2004?
We have been doing internet searches on Sharon Bialek. Her linkedin and all social networking/employer networking sites where her name appears seem to have been scrubbed. When you are telling the truth, why make the attempt to scrub your past?
Speaking of not making sense, why would a supposed Republican TEA Party activist/sympathizer call a known leftist hatchet man like Gloria Allred, as any association with Allred would impune her credibility?
It's time to destroy he, she, it. Swift Boat time.
Nobody commenting on this Cain affair was actually there so we cannot say for certain what actually happened. However, this may be another example of the left not being in touch with the age of Wikileaks, the internet, and Glasnost. Eighty years ago the leftist media could conceal the greatest genocide of its time. Today a bogus document is exposed within minutes. Twenty years ago John Tower’s nomination for secretary of defense was torpedoed by Leslie Stahl who reported that Tower had danced naked on a grand piano with a Russian-ballerina. Bod Woodward reported that “reliable sources” said that Tower was drunk and fondled a female airman. His reliable sources turned out to be one source who happened to be a psychiatric case. Tower’s nomination was defeated. I suspect that this woman is a fraud. If that is the case she will be exposed shortly.
Sure, it does, if she's trying to use her old connection to shake down Cain for some reason.
Why did her boyfriend, lo all those years ago, suggest she ask Cain for a meeting in Washington, outside business hours, to "ask for a job" or help getting her old job back? (Why did she lose her job at the NRA in the first place?)
Did she try to make trouble for Cain then and still had it in her to try to stalk him when he visited Chicago recently?
There are many reasons Cain could have "looked uncomfortable" (if true) when he saw this woman at an event. And they don't all have to do with him being guilty of anything or otherwise in the wrong.
We had a guy in Nevada, Scott Ashjian, run in a 3rd party as a shill “against” Harry Reid in the last election. He called his party, the “Tea Party”, much to the dismay of actual Nevada Tea Party supporters. He was a total fraud who was only running to help confuse voters who supported the Tea Party movement and might be voting for Sharron Angle, the conservative Republican. His real goal, which he accomplished was to help Harry Reid win reelection. He did show up at one Tea Party event to provide an appearance of support for the movement, but that was it. He was not at all active in the Tea Party movement. He spent most of his time during the campaign attacking Republicans.
It wouldn’t suprise me one bit to find out that his woman was attending a conservative event in order to give some credibility to her claim, just as the fake candidate Scott Ashjian attended a Tea Party event to appear as if he were “one of us.
Did any of these allegations come up during his senate campaign?
She was the manager for industry relations. Which doesn’t sound to me like a low-level job.
What if she went there in an attempt to meet up with Cain and “ask for help” with her career? And he rebuffed her? Or she went there to meet up with Cain to try to shake him down for something she’d tried to set him up with decades ago?
Attendance at one Tea Party convention doesn’t necessarily say much about one’s intentions or worldview. Especially when she knew Cain would be there and she made an effort and succeeded in approaching Cain personally there.
One of our FReepers hit the nail on the head. If Cain had done this to me, I certainly would not be seeking him out at a Tea Party rally.
This woman is a liar.
I suspect you’ll be waiting a very long time....
This is a moral issue, not a criminal issue.
On moral issues, I encourage people to go with their gut after reviewing all information available. There is NO obligation whatsoever to presume someone’s innocence once an allegation is made. In fact, it is stupid to do so in many instances (if a person is accused of child molestation, would you leave your kid with him because he is “innocent until proven guilty”?)
When the state wants to impose criminal penalties (always because of a moral breach), then I am glad the GOVERNMENT has to presume innocence until guilt is proven (but that is NOT the standard for private citizens).
I have no idea whether the woman’s story is true or not and whether she was put up to it or not.
But it makes sense to me that, as she described, she and her boyfriend had quasi-partied with Herman while she still had her job. So after she lost her position, she checked in with him to see if he could find her one elsewhere in the association (or at a state association).
If these charges are false, Cain has to take this woman on and sue her. If the democrats will falsely accuse in this manner and get away with this behaviour without being challenged then the gates are openned on all and any republican, candidate that comes along. Cain has to do more than just deny. His campaign has to sue her and get evidence that she is working for someone in order to ruin his run for Presidency.
Maybe she attended solely as a way to meet up with Cain — which, surprisingly, she succeeded at — as a way to try to leverage her old connection for career help, to get “famous” by being connected with the famous, to shake him down — many things possible here.
He didn’t “take her in,” so to speak.
Within a few weeks/months, she’s trashing him in the media — with a story that, by her own admission, she did not even tell her boyfriend or anyone else the details of at the time, lo more than a decade ago.
Maybe she even got in for free, seeing as she’s connected with the media (radio).
Oh no! I expect them to jump on this and blare all the eensy teensey itty bitty scurrilous facts they can dig up on this woman just like they did with Sarah Palin...............
Unfortunately, however, it is not a moral issue for the media or the Dems.
“manager” who only lasted 6 months on the job before she was fired (not resigned)!!
I am a woman, just older that Ms Bialek. In the mid 90’s IF I had called up one of my old employers while I was visiting from out of town and agreed to meet up with him in my hotel room, I would have been the sexual agressor.
This type of thing wasn’t done in my day, at least without the expectation of a sexual tryst.
I think she set him up then, as her target. He didn’t take the bait.
Or she was sent to the Chicago Tea Party convention for a reason.
She is from Chicago. That is just too, too convenient to be believable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.