I advocated taking all info available into account and then trusting your gut.
I also advocated that people stop applying “innocent until proven guilty” inappropriately. When folks misapply this standard, it demonstrates a major lack of understanding of the fundamentals of our moral AND legal system.
My own gut says she is not credible and Cain is.
Perhaps you could point me to the list of appropriate ‘innocent until proven guilty’ applications so in the future, I won't demonstrate such a major lack of understanding of the ‘fundamentals’ of our moral AND legal system. Not that you care because you obviously have a far superior grasp on the subject than I, but according to her presser today, what she alleges Cain did is ASSAULT and believe it or not, that is a LEGAL issue. Honestly, are you always so condescending?
Never fear, concern troll.
So far, almost NOBODY on FR is blithely assuming she is innocent.
Except some Perrywinkles.
posted on 11/07/2011 5:56:23 PM PST
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson