Skip to comments.Woman accuses Cain of bold sexual advance [ 2 bankruptcies yes 2 ]
Posted on 11/07/2011 4:57:09 PM PST by NoLibZone
Leaving little to the imagination, a Chicago-area woman on Monday accused Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain of making a crude sexual advance more than a decade ago when she was seeking his help finding a job.
"Come clean," Sharon Bialek challenged Cain at a news conference in New York at which she described herself as "a face and a voice" to support other accusers who have so far remained anonymous.
Cain's campaign swiftly denied Bialek's account. "All allegations of harassment against Mr. Cain are completely false," it said in a written statement.
Court records indicate Bialek had financial difficulties a decade ago when she filed for bankruptcy protection and reported $4,500 in unpaid rent and $13,000 in outstanding credit card bills.
Current property records show she owns a house on an acre of land in a Chicago suburb.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted2.ap.org ...
So the $100K View circuit has no bearing on her story.
Pray for America
In 1999, Bialek’s son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive. This is more than a year after the alleged incident and 5-6 years into her marriage.
I seem to remember allegations made against Obama too, however, the media ignored them. Why didn’t that man’s allegations make national news?
Wow... not the most stable gal on the block and she has loads of money problems!
Yup, she has a beef with Herman Cain alright. She’s broke.
So of course she voted against Clinton and Gore. /sarc
Yeah, I'm sure financial incentives had nothing to do with her coming forward to bravely tell her story to the media, with Gloria Allred standing right beside her.
Put some ice on it.
This reads like a poorly written 2 part story line in the old TV series ‘IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT.’
Did the “father” file a paternity suit to prove that he was not the father?
Can someone please tell Gloria the Red that Precious was not employed at the time? Cain could not have been her boss, and could not be guilty of workplace sexual harassment.
Can anyone open this link?
This is supposedly what is there about her:
Sued for $440.00 1994
Sued for $2205.00 2000 BROADACRE MANAGEME Joint Lawsuit
Sued for $2250.00 “ “
Sued for $6750.00 “ “
Sued for $3000.00 Mark Beatovic 2005
Sued for $1000.27 MIDLAND FUNDING LL
Sued for $3539.58 ILLINOS LENDING
unemployed gutter skank looking for her 5 mintutes of fame and a few bucks she doesnt have to earn for once with her mouth.
Just another scumbag from the Allred Rent An Accuser stable. Creepy women. A “Chicago-area woman”, huh? Damn. Chicago-area. Chicago-area. Where have I heard that before?
Exactly. What took place, even according to the Left is a private matter. Its no one else’s business. Its just sex and there is nothing to see here and its time to move on.
The more I think about this “campaign” to discredit Cain the more I thing it is fairly advanced in planning and has been thought out.
OK - take the “lady” being represented by Gloria Alred - a pariah to most of us - but think about it. She is always on the Nancy Grace show and many Nancy Gracers know her (or think they do). If they can take 10% of the female vote away from Cain that eats into his fairly slim lead.
At first I thought Alred was only there because of camera facetime - now I’m thinking she may be there as part of a plan.
Is this you Rove? You magnificent slime ball?
Bialek is a walking lawsuit magnet. And I can’t imagine why Allred would take on a client who can’t even pay her bills. What she gets on welfare isn’t enough to pay Allred’s six figures lifestyle.
Be advised the political landscape is littered with the corpses of Allreds victories over republicans going all the way back to Bruce Hershenson.
This Piraña doesn’t let go, is not limited to the truth and will take Cain down as easily as she took Meg Whitman down.
Sad to say but true. Our only option is to get Sarah back in the race or else Romney will be the last man standing and the nominee
She’s trying to yank the chain of the Right, these reputed sexual puritans. Trouble is, today’s sexual puritans do not usually believe in witch hunts. They want some proof or at least an account that holds water before waggling their fingers at Herman Cain. Neither of these has been produced to date.
According to the Chicago Tribune the skank’s been living with a john named Harwood for the last four years. For the last two, they have been living in “an upscale” home in Mundelein, Ill. Harwood reportedly is from “London”, and works in the “medical equipment industry.” In the picture supplied by the ChiTrib the red-faced guy appears half-drunk. By the time this is over, and his immigration status is checked, I’ll bet he wishes he never met the woman.
Someone other than this woman is paying Allred's fees. Trust me.
In the interest of full disclosure, I want little Miss Perfect to give all the names of all the men who put a hand up her skirt, down her dress, and all points around those areas.
If Cain committed adultery, he’d be disgraced. But I think they would have audio recordings, pictures, videos - something objective and that can’t be disputed. And I think the Left will keep digging.
Inglorious Allred just took a bite of something larger than she could chew in Herman Cain. Cain has boldly called her bluff. This Piranha will shortly need the Heimlich maneuver.
The two BKs means that she CANNOT handle money...so when someone drags a $100 bill in front of her, she will certainly do what it takes to snatch it.
Even if that weren’t the case, my vote and my money stay with Cain UNTIL I hear details of his past felony conviction. Anything less, and he meets my standards for president, as I set them at the same level as Clinton’s supporters. In other words, I WILL NOT PERMIT the media to tell me who I should and should not vote for.
So it’s CAIN ALL THE WAY...until that felony conviction comes in (as if it will).
This lady makes unconfirmed accusation's and the MSM goes to the bank with it with no background information on her what so ever!....
No double standard here Folks....move along..
London, ON or London, UK?
I wonder if its a Green Card marriage.
The guy she was embroiled in a paternity suit with, West Naze, is the Executive VP of a subsidiary of News Corp, which also owns Fox News. The suits and countersuits between the two of them went on for many years. It must have been quite acrimonious. Which makes it even more ironic that her current fiancee (with whom she has been cohabiting for a few years without benefit of marriage) has "friended" West Naze on facebook.
Oh, and just a small point of interest, Allred claimed in the presser that this woman is a registered Republican. There’s a link on that same thread I referenced in previous post that shows the woman is, in fact, not registered to vote.
Are we really on FReerepublic? Man...
Paternity suits of this kind (to prove you ARE the father of a child born to a woman married at the time to somebody else) are quite rare and would suggest an unusual reason. He’s clearly not worried about being overcome by child support issues. Perhaps he wants to adopt the child.
If it were nearly ANYONE other than Allred who brought this skank forward I would attempt to believe it. But Gloria has used up all her cred over the years peddling Feminist PC crap, so, in my opinion, she’s outta’ gas!
It would be interesting to know the outcome of the paternity test by the HUSBAND of this new “victim” and whether the child really DID belong to the HUSBAND or to SOMEONE ELSE!
Are you referring to LARRY SINCLAIR, the man who had sex and smoked crack with BARACK OBAMA in the backseat of that limousine on more than one occasion?
He wrote a book about his gay sex and drug use with Obama... here’s the book at Amazon.com
I hope these charges are not true. But if it's not true, then Cain should be able to successfully show some kind of facts that counter the lies.
However, if any of this were true the best thing Cain could have done from the get go would have been to belly up, admit the wrong doing, and show that he's changed his heart and actions. But we're now down the road of denial. I hope this stuff isn't true but if any of it is, at this point, I think he's got a problem.
I had some guy tell me earlier that he’s never seen anything misogynistic on FR...lol...
With her mouth... I hope that’s not as crude as it looks. She’s trying to earn some bucks with her mouth NOW it looks... she’s using that mouth to lie about Herman Cain.
Sex is a potent weapon of mass destraction. The media is being saturated with these scandals just to get you to forget about Fast and Furious, Fannie and Freddie, being unemployed for the next 10 years and most of all, what a rotten president obama is.
Not just that, but apparently she has a constant jihad going against Republicans. So it truly is the same old same old.
This is going to get interesting....erasing an online social networking account won’t stop the folks that got Dan Rather on the fake old letters ;)
Larry Sinclair, call your office!
CAin may not have called this woman “sweetie”..
There appears to be nothing “sweet” there..
Phones need to be tapped, and communications need to be hacked...........
I got the impression to prove that he was. The other alternative is worse for her credibility, but neither case is good.
Too bad for the Rats that Bill Clinton lowered expectations of politicians’ personal morality by about an order of magnitude during his tenure in the White House. It’s a little too late for them to try to raise that bar again. In fact the way the story of this little alleged “consensual” tryst is playing out makes Herman Cain look virtually like an angel. If Cain did even that much, and he’s flatly denying it. He certainly has had the time to get the story straight by now, so the gauntlet clearly has been hurled down at mach speed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.