Skip to comments.Boston Globe reporter withholds Obama file birth (narrative doesn't match up with INS reports)
Posted on 11/09/2011 7:09:04 AM PST by tutstar
A Boston Globe reporter sympathetic to Barack Obama apparently received favored access to the immigration file of the president's father.
In writing her biography of Barack Obama's father, Boston Globe reporter Sally H. Jacobs had access to what appears to be the father's unredacted Immigration and Naturalization Service file. The documents cover the time Barack Obama Sr. arrived in Honolulu in 1959 until he was forced to leave the United States in 1964.
However, the redacted file the Department of Homeland Security provided in an Freedom of Information Act request to independent reporter Heather Smathers whited-out key facts about the president's birth narrative, judging from the one unredacted page WND has obtained.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
- Immaculate conception
- Born in a manger in Kenya
- Wrapped in swaddling clothes
- Caused new star to appear in sky
Bari! ...you gots some ‘plaining to do!
you’re right about that!
hahahaha that’s funny!!
Sally H. Jacobs
Sally H. Jacobs lives in Boston. She has been a reporter for over three decades, most recently with The Boston Globe. She has specialized in political reporting and profiles including the famously reclusive Joan Kennedy, Michelle Obama, and Pat Patrick, Deval Patrick’s father. This is her first book.
A sealed and archived OLFBC is an indication of an adoption. A HI COLB with a “date filed” instead of a “date accepted” is another indication of an adoption.
And finally, a name change from Barack Hussein Obama II to Barry Soetoro is another indication of an adoption.
Adoptions take several years to finalize. Lolo Soetoro was SAD Soetoro’s husband and BHO’s II stepfather before the name change and Soetoro being named as his father.
Obama Sr. Bio Repackages Nativity Myth
Following the lead of the New Yorkers David Remnick and the New York Times Janny Scott, the Boston Globes Sally Jacobs chooses to duck the truth about President Obamas origins in her new biography, The Other Barack: The Bold and Reckless Life of President Obamas Father.
Like her fellow biographers, Jacobs labors to protect the foundational myth of President Obamas political ascendancy, in Remnicks words, his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal.
As the president tells the story, he was the product of an improbable love between a girl from Kansas and a goatherd from Kenya who shared a faith in the possibilities of this nation.
Last month on the eve of Fathers Day, Obama buttressed the myth once more by claiming that Obama Sr. left when I was 2 years old. This implies, of course, that there was a home and family to leave.
There was not, but like Scott in her new biography of Obamas mother, A Singular Woman, Jacobs helps sustain the fraud by both omission and commission.
About the courtship of Ann Dunham and Obama Sr., Jacobs rehashes old information. As she relates, Obama said nothing of his new girlfriend to most of his friends on campus. Jacobs attributes this to Obama Sr.s discretion on personal matters.
Obama Sr., however, was less discreet about other women. Jacobs tells of his courtship of a blonde co-ed, whom he often took out in public, including a night of dancing at a tourist hot spot in Honolulu.
Later Jacobs relates the tale of future Obama Sr. spouse Ruth Baker. Writes Jacobs of the couple, They went dancing at the hottest clubs around Cambridge. No such luck for Ann Dunham. No one even knew they were an item.
Jacobs feels obliged to create a married life for this couple. To accomplish this, she turns to current Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, whose serial lies about his relationship to baby Obama were exposed at the beginning of 2011.
Knowing this, Jacobs would have had time to rewrite the Abercrombie section but did not. She takes him at this word that “every now and then” Obama Sr. took his wife and baby out to meet friends. This is nonsense.
I think the first parentheses is in the wrong place, should be between file and birth. Makes much more sense that way.
Stuff like this is ridiculous. If they shared a faith about the possibilities of this nation, why were they planning to go to Kenya??
Susan Blake, another high-school classmate, said that during a brief visit in 1961, Dunham was excited about her husband's plans to return to Kenya.
"We all had June Cleaver as our role models, and she was blazing new trails for herself," said Blake, a former Mercer Island city councilwoman.
Over the next three decades, she became a well-traveled anthropologist, working in Indonesia, Pakistan and elsewhere.
"The life that Stanley chose to live after she left [Mercer Island] is indicative of the fact that Stanley thought about what else was out there," said former classmate Stenhouse.
"She was ready for having different experiences."
link to story
Someone needs to photoshop those lips.
Maybe the White House can do it for free....hopefully it will be better than the LFBC.
This career synopsis is more consistent with being a CIA agent than a banker. What training would have qualified her to be an international banking consultant?
To my knowledge (and personal experience with CIA recruiting) the CIA would never have embraced a Red-Diaper Baby bigamously married to a radical socialist. She was much more likely to be a KGB asset than a CIA agent.
Her undergraduate degree was in mathematics, so she could easily comprehend the rudimentary accounting skills needed to be involved in micro-loan programs to women in third-world countries. That and her comfort in living in Muslim countries and her anthropological skills made her a perfect fit for the progressive programs of the Ford Foundation.
Boston Globe reporter withholds 0bama file birth (narrative doesn't match up with INS reports)
. . . . # 18 , then # 21 .
More telling, perhaps, might be a journalism student presented with two sets of facts for stories, containing similar evidence, crimes, but different perpetrators/victims, and see what differences were present in the way they addressed the events, evidence, and underlying issues.
Dunham’s associaion with the insidious Ford Foundation is nothing to sneeze at.
“In 2010, the foundation granted $16.4 million (USD) to foundations throughout the world that advocate legalization of abortion or provide abortion services, including Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and International Planned Parenthood Foundation. In 2010, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America was elected to Ford Foundation’s board of trustees.
The foundations partnership with the New Israel Fund, which began in 2003, was frequently criticised regarding its choice of mostly liberal grantees and causes. This criticism came to light after the 2001 Durban Conference, where some NGOs funded by the foundation backed resolutions equating Israeli policies as apartheid, and later, against those groups which support the delegitimization of Israel. In response, the foundation adopted stricter criteria for funding.”
We all know what kind of monsters Planned Parenthood are, but who or what is the New Israel Fund ?
Also from wikipedia:
“The New Israel Fund was established in 1979 and has seed-funded most progressive social change groups in Israel. Since its inception the fund has provided over US $200 million to more than 800 organizations. NIF was the first major Jewish organization to work extensively with Arab citizens of Israel.”
Ok. No big deal, but.....
“In September 2011, the contents of a United States diplomatic telegram were revealed via Wikileaks, stating that Hedva Radovanitz, then Assistant Director of NIF Israel, said “she believed that in 100 years Israel would be majority Arab and that the disappearance of a Jewish state would not be the tragedy that Israelis fear since it would become more ‘democratic.”
Yes, these things came after Stanley Ann Dunham’s death, but I wanted to illustrate how dangerous the Ford Foundation is, and I wanted to illustrate what a radical Dunham had to be in order to be associated with it. Scary stuff when you consider her son (I guess, well, I don’t know) is the sitting President of the United States.
I agree, but I strongly believe this type of testing is necessary. Higher education has become incredibly expensive, but there is no standard analysis of the final ‘product’. ‘Name’ schools purport to be ‘the best’, but never have to prove anything head to head. There's no question that a highly motivated person with ability can perform as well or better educating themselves with alternative resources than students in traditional venues. They deserve to be able to prove it in an irrefutable way. It's the most egalitarian, affordable, and non-elitist approach possible.
For the sciences, math, engineering etc. keeping bias out of the tests would not be as difficult as in social sciences, journalism etc., but even for the later it could be done. It would be necessary to have an independent testing agency that was monitored for content and wasn't controlled by university faculty. In many instances questions could be submitted by people actually working in the particular fields being tested.
Wouldn't be perfect, but it could be a game changer.
So what seems to be the case is that Mama Obama got herself knocked with some black guy’s baby and needed a cover. This black guy figures he can get citizenship by marrying her. Didn’t work though because he couldn’t keep it in his pants to even pretend to be married.
To a point.
FOr example, the tests would have to be carefully vetted--and which experts would do so?
Issues which creep into the sciences:
Anthropogenic Global Warming,
Effects of Atmospheric CO2 levels,
the composition of diet vs. health and "wellness",
the correlation between abortion and breast cancer, vaccine risks (autism, allergies produced by squalene exposure, thimoserol) vs. benefits,
Joe McCarthy (saint or demon?),
History of Western Civilization in general, but especially the last century,
and it gets worse with the 'fuzzy' sciences (psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc.)
So much of what is taught in universities today is polluted by the Liberal agendae, whether those are State Universities or IV League, that it would be difficult to come up with tests which would survive (corrupted) peer review and not reflect the Liberal/Marxist bias present in what we call higher education.
While I agree in principle that standardized testing might be good for fundamentals, when you get to the level of even the GRE in specific subject areas, the potential for bias could negate the purpose of indicating the quality of the student and instead only measure the level of indoctrination.
Moochelle let the cat out of the bag when she said SADO was very young and very single.
Back on the long thread (?) there is a discussion of SADO's Seattle college apartment being next to the Salvation Army.
Who doesn't believe the INS file hasn't been fixed like his passport, school records, BC, etc.?
“While I agree in principle that standardized testing might be good for fundamentals, when you get to the level of even the GRE in specific subject areas, the potential for bias could negate the purpose of indicating the quality of the student and instead only measure the level of indoctrination.”
As it stands now we have no control at all. At least in that context you would have a standardized record of bias that could be challenged. I have taken lots of board exams, which are essentially the same categorically as what we’ve been discussing. They’re not perfect, but they do demonstrate that you have or don’t have a basic operative level of competence. Incidentally, in these kinds of exams it’s not the Ivies etc. that necessarily do the best.
Their East West friends posted remembrances of Sr. that they never knew about a baby.
All those times from college and on that he spent in Pakistan is yet another reason he hid out on the golf course before the OBL raid and why he wrote Pakistan a hefty check afterward. The enemy within.
So, unfortunately, he's probably a NBC, but he has lied and schemed his way through life.
Looks like reporters in Pennsylvania did a similar 'withholding' of information. How charming.
Speaking of sloppy writing (not yours), I sure hope we are talking about an "improbable love" between a girl from Kansas and a GOATHERDER (instead of a goatherd) from Kenya. Good grief.
Good catch. Actually that would explain things. Obama is half-American and Half-Kenyan Goat.