Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keystone XL: Nebraskans take pipeline issue all the way to the White House
The Guardian ^ | Thursday 10 November 2011 | Suzanne Goldenberg

Posted on 11/10/2011 3:29:56 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

The tar sandhills near Mills in north central Nebraska, through which the Keystone XL pipeline is planned to be built.

The woman seated before the row of suited state legislators in her red Husker team hoodie was choking on tears. She had grown up on a farm in Nebraska. Her parents had grown up on farms, in the days before electricity and running water, and now she said generations of toil and sweat could be destroyed in an instant by a $7bn pipeline project.

A leak from the pipeline, which would run from the tar sands of Alberta to the refineries of Texas, could poison her land forever, Donna Roller told the hearing this week during a special session of the state legislature.

"This thing shouldn't even be built. It's wrong and it's toxic," she said. Then she went outside and collapsed against a wall, sobbing. "Somebody, something has got to stop it," she said.

On Thursday, something did. The State Department said it would review alternative routes for the pipeline to avoid ecologically sensitive areas of Nebraska.

The announcement was an unexpected victory for environmental groups and for landowners like Roller who had despaired of forcing Barack Obama to take a tough stand against the oil industry going into an election year.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; bipartisan; collapse; default; liars; nimbeeches; shtf; teotwawki

1 posted on 11/10/2011 3:29:58 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Nothing like a liberal in tears to beat our national interests into the ground. Has she seen what several acres of windmills and reflectors look like in a beautiful desert area? NIMBY ahole.

2 posted on 11/10/2011 3:32:33 PM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Don’t worry, if Obama doesn’t give the go ahead, we’ll build the refining processing plants in Alberta and truck and train the finished fuel products to you.

Come to Alberta and find work.
Stay and enjoy our majestic Rocky Mountains.

3 posted on 11/10/2011 3:34:23 PM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

The corner stone of free people, private property rights, without which we would be like the rag land people and the oil would belong to the king. Get a grip.

4 posted on 11/10/2011 3:38:33 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
The announcement was an unexpected victory for environmental groups and for landowners like Roller

... and a completely expected loss to the thousands of landowners and consumers and jobless Americans who could have benefited from lower energy costs and more jobs.

But hey, at least it shut up the poor boo-hoo lady, and that's all that matters.

5 posted on 11/10/2011 3:42:17 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Same old whiney crap, with the Enviro-Wacko's being appeased and securing their votes for King Obama.

Forest fires EVERY year wipe out 100's of thousands of acres due to over-growth, but we have to "protect" the pristine woods, so loggers don't thin them out and create lumber or goods.....we've got so much land now that's Government-owned and controlled, to keep the Oil Barons happy and the Chinese happy, that Americans are left out of jobs and energy.

6 posted on 11/10/2011 3:47:18 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Somebody show the dopes a pipeline map of the USA. LOL .... This pipeline will be newer than the other two and it’ll be the shortest one in Nebraska.

7 posted on 11/10/2011 4:08:20 PM PST by OkiMusashi (Beware the fury of a patient man. --- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

works for the Saudi Royal Family...why not the Canucks?

8 posted on 11/10/2011 5:24:58 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I am a landowner in South Dakota, just north of the Nebraska Sand Hills. The pipeline may end up running across my land. I have received two requests for permission to survey a route through my property. I have refused both times and will continue to fight to keep the pipeline off my land.

The pipeline may be a good deal for America, but it is a rotten deal for the landowners whose land will be devalued by the constant and long-lasting risk of the pipeline. The landowners will receive a small, one-time payment but will have their land put at risk for as long as the pipeline exists. From a purely financial standpoint, it is a high risk, low reward deal. It just plain stinks.

My family already lost land when the dams were build along the Missouri River. We did our part for U.S. energy policy. It is someone else’s turn.

You don’t have to be a liberal to oppose the pipeline.

9 posted on 11/10/2011 5:36:01 PM PST by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

NIMBYs are trash—all of ‘em. It’s good that they’ll be losing their pensions (default) and croaking from their sedentary ways over the next decade or two. Good riddance! There are no “property values.” They’re finished. An age of property rights without NIMBY garbage getting in the way is about to begin. ...same with their socialist sources of income.

10 posted on 11/10/2011 5:36:27 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in a noisy avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OkiMusashi

11 posted on 11/10/2011 5:58:49 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Irving has a large refinery in Saint John NB, the could simply pipe it east, refine it and ship it out of that port... keep all the jobs for themselves.

12 posted on 11/10/2011 7:09:12 PM PST by pithyinme (Obama stimulus is 5 times the cost & half the satisfaction...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Rolls eye - she should go to Prince William Sound - forever my azz.

Call me when gas hit 5 bucs a gallon, then we will know who to thank!

13 posted on 11/10/2011 9:56:11 PM PST by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch


The risks to you and other land owners are very high. This isn’t going through federal land, and and clean up costs will be very high when (not if) the line leaks.

Not to mention the fact that the government has hinted they will use ED to take the line if they can’t buy rights to it.

14 posted on 11/16/2011 7:20:01 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson