Posted on 11/11/2011 6:47:52 PM PST by Hoodat
Everyone should speak out against any abuse of any child. Everyone should speak out against the sexual abuse of anyone, child or adult.
Let me ask you this, do you really believe, as you stated, that half of FReeper men would cheer on the Penn State rape of a ten year old boy if the rapist were a woman?
If one was starting with the naughty teacher threads as their primary point of reference that would be the logical assumption.
Bringing back that you CLAIM to be a lawyer, have you ever bothered to do a little homework and run the math on the posters who support the female pedo teaches vs. those who oppose them on those threads, or did you just decide to try to rest on your credentials on this thread and make shit up that you can't back with the available empirical evidence?
She already said that was her source.
If you are not full of crap, take the last forty or fifty of those threads, extract the statistics, and prove her wrong if she is wrong.
Good luck with that.
Norm, have you seen this one??? Check posting history! They’re all over the place!!!
“Let me ask you this, do you really believe, as you stated, that half of FReeper men would cheer on the Penn State rape of a ten year old boy if the rapist were a woman?”
Why don’t we see? Change the sexes and post it as an article. Link it to a blog.
Let’s see what FReepers say.
It would be my greatest hope to be proven wrong. I would love it if more than half the men snarled like tigers against this crime.
But let’s do a series of experiments.
- a 35 y/o man with a 14 y/o girl
- a 35 y/o woman with a 14 y/o boy
- a 35 y/o man with a 14 y/o boy
- a 35 y/o man with a 15 y/o girl
- a 35 y/o woman with a 15 y/o boy
- a 35 y/o man with a 15 y/o boy
All are minors. All below the age on consent. I promise yo that the homosexual articles will have harsh responses, condemning the actions of the molester in the worst of terms.
The male-molests-girl arguments will be almost as bad (good?) in their condemnation.
But when it comes to the female-molests-boy article, it won’t be as bad.
Quit calling me names and prove it.
These people sound like the defenders of Clinton.
I'm not calling you names, I'm just accurately describing you, a lying libeler of all male FReepers. I don't have to prove anything. You opened up your mouth and defamed around 125,000 FReepers with a stupid statement with no proof. You started digging your hole with a shovel and then you brought in a backhoe. You earned everything you've been called. 95% of FReepers can't stand you.
And BTW, I have friends in academia close to this situation. They said that all but two of Sandusky’s victims are black. Wait until the media gets a hold of that info.
As I never called ALL male FReepers anything I'd say that YOU are now guilty of liable.
So, are you going to do that test and prove me wrong? :-)
>> “You’re not getting it. You just don’t get it,” said Dave Lorenz who was abused by a priest as a teen.
What an amazing coincidence.
Oh, how I wish the focus was not becoming this clear...because what I am sensing here is that these white admins & white coaches may have “put up” with not intervening on behalf of the victims because the victims they knew of were black. They were deemed “expendable” — especially in light of the alternative...
>> But when it comes to the female-molests-boy article, it won’t be as bad.
The condemnation is sparse in comparison.
Thanks.
You really don’t see any difference in the outcome to the boys between a 25 year old female teacher seducing a 15 year old virgin high school boy, and a 55 year old male coach grooming and raping a ten year old boy?
They are the same to you? Equally damaging?
As a male, I can say that on this one, you are off your rocker. (And I would not presume to speak for women or girls, not being one.)
As i pointed out earlier, You Prokopton are making shit up that is countered by the empirical evidence. I have to assume that you are not really a lawyer, or that you only work as a clerk for someone else because nobody can make a living in the legal field with work as sloppy as yours.
I pointed out that you could just run the math on the naughty teacher threads.
You haven't done so yet you keep trying to push your made up crap. You never got far enough in school to learn elementary statistics, did you Prokopton? Still don't know the difference between the average and the mean? Think X bar and R charts have something to do with cattle ranches?
Or you have been caught in a lie and are hoping to bluster your way through.
Bluster ain't working, Prokopton.
Honesty is not your friend, MrEdd.
Checking in - computer difficulties.
Rough road ahead, when so many don’t see what happens when traditional aka “real” morailty is thrown in the trash.
This is not a he said she said question.
The truth is carved out in the posts on those threads.
You have put yourself in a position where it has been pointed out that there is wealth of evidence contradicting your contentions and none supporting you.
You continue to stamp your feet, scream hysterically “no no no you're all lying” and then you hold your breath.
No amount of continued childishness on your part will make you seem credible.
Do you think he's enduring a slap-fest down at "county" or is he in solitary for his own protection?
Your attempts to cloud the issue are pathetic. None of your postings change the fact that Marie, in a most disgusting way, libeled a huge number of FReepers.
Marie posted, concerning the rape of a ten year old boy at Penn State, and I quote:
"If the teacher had been a female, half of the FReeper men here would’ve been cheering the abuse on."
She accused tens of thousands of FReepers of being the type of men that would cheer on the rape of a ten year old boy if the rapist was a woman. This is an outrageous and libelous statement that she would not back down from nor apologize for. You have endorsed this statement and have made yourself no better than she. Maybe you want to inform Mr. Robinson that half of the men registered on his conservative news forum would cheer on the rape of a ten year old boy. Do you think he would endorse that?
You want me to "prove" something. I am not the one who made the libelous statement. It is up to the libeler to prove what they said is true. Go ahead, prove to me and all the rest of the male FReepers that half of us would cheer on the rape of a ten year old boy. If you can't, then you should come out and admit the statement was wrong and apologize for your endorsement of it.
Let's see what type of a man you are.
I'd say that YOU are now guilty of liable.I'd say you're liable to be guilty of catachresis.
The definition of an extremist is someone who can’t tell who their friends are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.