Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/15/2011 7:11:49 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

She won’t recuse herself,
she’ll vote to keep 0bamacare,
and there’s nothing anyone will do about it.

More, the left will, in their usual fashion of accusing the right of what the left is doing, demand Thomas’ recusal because of some supposed fringe conflict of interest that his wife has.


2 posted on 11/15/2011 7:14:52 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Does anyone think she’ll recuse herself from the upcoming case? Doubt it.... Meanwhile the same people that see nothing wrong in this are the ones saying Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from the case because his wife is affiliated with a tea party group....


3 posted on 11/15/2011 7:15:55 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

if this Byotch does not recuse herself....The Conservative Justices need NEVER Recuse themselves again(think Justice Clarence Thomas and any sexual issues.)


4 posted on 11/15/2011 7:16:31 AM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Liberals never do the correct & honorable thing.

It always just win baby, ends justify the means.

5 posted on 11/15/2011 7:16:45 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If there ever was an argument that an average mind could obtain a law degree, this woman is a prime example.

She is only a couple of degrees above “simpleton” and the fact that the Obama-butt placed her into such a high legal position fully illustrates both his intellectual lack and also the degree to which our highest court has fallen.


6 posted on 11/15/2011 7:27:45 AM PST by Da Coyote (Liberalism - when you absolutely, positively have no ability to produce wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If she expressed her views, she must recuse!!! :)


7 posted on 11/15/2011 7:30:20 AM PST by Sudetenland (There can be no freedom without God--What man gives, man can take away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

She’s a tool.


8 posted on 11/15/2011 7:32:06 AM PST by b4its2late (Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I have no confidence in our legal system. Since every important decision is 5 to 4 I can only surmise that there is no shared set of principles among the justices.

Present any conceivable proposition to a competent lawyer and he can construct an iron clad legal case on either side of the question.


9 posted on 11/15/2011 7:32:25 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

if it is upheld 5-4 there is gonna be trouble


15 posted on 11/15/2011 7:45:21 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Kagan will be just as excited to vote to keep this terrible law in effect just as her master, Obama, wants.


17 posted on 11/15/2011 7:47:32 AM PST by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

they better have more than this email for kagan to recuse herself.


29 posted on 11/15/2011 8:48:43 AM PST by stylin19a (obama - "FREDO" smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Elections have consequences.
...and its the republicans fault for not battling her nomination.

There seems to be a general view that it shouldn’t matter who goes on the SCOTUS, because it is a benny for the president who won the presidential election. Somehow, someway, we have gotten to the point that Repub’s feel disinclined to fight nominees. This lack of will is a disservice to those that elected them. Frankly, they should be thrown out next election.

SCOTUS definitively shapes the culture of our lives. They determine what is allowable and acceptable. Reversing a decision of unelectable, politcally appointed people, is nearly impossible. Any element of our society, whether political or societal, that can shape culture is the business of those we elect.


31 posted on 11/15/2011 8:56:03 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson