Skip to comments.
Dems fear Supreme Court will rule against Obama on healthcare reform
The Hill ^
| 11/14/11
| Julian Pecquet
Posted on 11/15/2011 9:39:39 AM PST by freespirited
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a former state attorney general who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said that the individual mandate might very well fall Even RATS know they crossed the line.
To: freespirited
They better and if they don't then the GOP better be ready to defund every aspect of it.
2
posted on
11/15/2011 9:41:54 AM PST
by
tobyhill
(Obama, The Biggest Thief In American History)
To: freespirited
Of course Im concerned, said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). The justices decide for insurance companies, they decide for oil companies, they decide for the wealthy too often. This moron has absolutely no understanding of the Constitution. It is amazing how an idiot like this can get elected! Yea, I know, by all the other idiots.
3
posted on
11/15/2011 9:44:01 AM PST
by
mosaicwolf
(Strength and Honor)
To: freespirited
Maybe Obummer will regret that he made a fool of himself and an enemy of the Court by lying about the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision right in front of them at the State of the Union address. What an idiot he is.
4
posted on
11/15/2011 9:44:20 AM PST
by
hsalaw
To: mosaicwolf
This moron has absolutely no understanding of the Constitution. He's no worse than the O!!!
To: freespirited
Democrats on Capitol Hill are worried that the Supreme Court will rule against President Obamas healthcare reform law.
AS DAMN WELL THEY SHOULD BE!...
To: freespirited
I swear, this a-holes don’t even bother to hide the Marxism any more, just like the maggot infested OWS hippies.
7
posted on
11/15/2011 9:49:26 AM PST
by
Marathoner
(Occupy Wall Street = Useful Idiots on Parade)
To: freespirited
FAKE STORY. The Rats fully expect, as do I that the flunkies they have on the Supreme Court will rubber stamp the whole thing. After all, the judgie-wudgies wouldn’t want to lose their own cushy gubmint benefits!!!
To: freespirited
I remain unconvinced our Supreme Court will see this matter clearly.
9
posted on
11/15/2011 9:53:23 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Obyema 2012 - he has addition deficit disorder... (not my line, but a great one to repeat))
To: freespirited
May their fears become a gleaming reality.
What this says, actually, is that they don’t really care to know if it’s constitutional or not, as long as they get their way. Who cares about the constitutional rights of individual patients and health care providers.
To: freespirited
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), who is up for reelection, said trying to delay the high courts review just would have been political, and I think what theyre trying to do is get this decided on its merits. And I think thats appropriate. I really dont have an opinion on how the court will treat this case, Nelson said. Itll be whatever it is.
And yet you voted for it, Senator? Despite apparently being utterly, totally ambivalent about it? You need to be run out of office on a rail!
To: freespirited
We all know [the justices] are going to put their ideologies aside and do the right thing. Right?
Yeah, Barry...just you put your ideology aside when you shoved this up the butt of the American people.
I pray to GOD the Supreme Court strikes this travesty DOWN as firmly and completely as it deserves.
Question: So what if Kagan refuses to recuse herself? Can she be forced to do so?
12
posted on
11/15/2011 9:55:32 AM PST
by
Adder
(Say NO to the O in 2 oh 12)
To: hsalaw
That decision leaves the fate of Democrats signature domestic achievement in the hands of a right-leaning (MAKE THAT CONSTITUTION LEANING) court that has consistently ruled against liberals on everything from campaign finance to the District of Columbias gun ban to Bush v. Gore.
13
posted on
11/15/2011 9:56:04 AM PST
by
taterjay
To: mosaicwolf
Yea, I know, by all the other idiots.Throughout our history that has always been the case. The distressing thing in these modern times is idiots are getting closer to outnumbering the non-idiots.
14
posted on
11/15/2011 9:56:58 AM PST
by
Jagdgewehr
(It will take blood.)
To: freespirited
I think the RATS want it overruled. Gets them off the hook and one less issue for 2012.
15
posted on
11/15/2011 10:03:22 AM PST
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: Adder
Question: So what if Kagan refuses to recuse herself? Can she be forced to do so? I dont know, but am under the impression that the decision is left up to the justice in question.
Look! It's Spam!!!
Click The Spam And Donate
Donate Anyway
17
posted on
11/15/2011 10:04:32 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: freespirited
This is why Obummer is pushing to get it decided before 2012.
He knows it will fail but wants to use it as an excuse to fire up the base to come out and vote and throw out the the GOP house and save his behind.
18
posted on
11/15/2011 10:07:00 AM PST
by
Zathras
To: freespirited
the Supreme Court, which The New York Times editorial page recently labeled the most conservative high court since the 1950s. As Einstein proved, a New York Times editorial page that is hurtling leftward at indeterminate speed cannot tell whether anything else is moving to the right. From the moving platform of the Times, everything appears to be moving to the right. |
19
posted on
11/15/2011 10:10:33 AM PST
by
Nick Danger
(Pin the fail on the donkey)
To: freespirited
Dems fear Supreme Court will rule against Obama on healthcare reformThey should be crapping in their pants. Obamacare is unconstitutional.
The fat lady hasn't sung, however. The fat lady here is, Jusitce Anthony Kennedy. That should strike fear in every conservative.
20
posted on
11/15/2011 10:13:11 AM PST
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson