Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.C. Heart Attack Rates Down Since Passage of Smoke-Free Law
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services ^ | November 9, 2011 | Mark Van Sciver

Posted on 11/16/2011 12:39:21 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

RALEIGH – Emergency room visits by North Carolinians experiencing heart attacks have declined by 21 percent since the January 2010 start of the state’s Smoke-Free Restaurants and Bars Law. State Health Director Dr. Jeffrey Engel reported the results to the Justus-Warren Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Task Force this morning.

“We pushed for passage of this law because we knew it would save lives,” said Governor Bev Perdue, who signed the law into effect. “Our goal was to protect workers and patrons from breathing secondhand smoke and we are seeing positive results.”

The N.C. Division of Public Health report cites studies from numerous communities, states and countries that show similar declines in heart attack rates after enacting tobacco-free policies as well as a 2008 Institute of Medicine report concluding smoke-free laws are a proven way to decrease heart attack rates.

According to U.S. Surgeon General’s Reports from 2006 and 2010, chemicals in tobacco smoke narrow the blood vessels, raise blood pressure and heart rate, and trigger chemical changes in the blood that make cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks, more likely to happen in the hours following breathing the smoke.

“The Institute of Medicine has evaluated the effects of indoor smoking bans world-wide, and data consistently show that smoke-free laws reduce heart attacks,” Dr. Engel said. “The Centers for Disease Control acknowledges that secondhand smoke exposure causes heart attacks; even a brief stay in a smoky area can trigger a heart attack in someone who is at risk, such as those with heart disease, a family history of heart disease, high blood pressure, or high cholesterol.”

Engel reported that the decline in heart attacks in North Carolina in 2010 represents an estimated $3.3 to $4.8 million in health care cost savings. Secondhand smoke is a known trigger for other health conditions like asthma, stroke, and chest pain, and is a major risk factor for lung cancer, the state’s leading cancer killer.

A team of researchers from the Division of Public Health and the University of North Carolina Department of Emergency Medicine used statewide emergency department data from the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NCDETECT) to examine rates of heart attacks before the law in 2008 and 2009 compared to rates after the law took effect in 2010. These results add to a growing number of studies documenting the health benefits of smoke-free legislation across the nation and the world.

“North Carolina’s experience in seeing reduced heart attack rates after implementation of smoke-free legislation is consistent with others that have taken this important step to enhance the population’s health,” Dr. David Goff of the Justus Warren Heart Disease and Stroke Task Force said. “Informed by this strong evidence, we should now act to protect all workers in North Carolina, not just those working in restaurants and bars, from the hazards of second hand smoke.”

The heart attack study is posted at N.C. Report on Heart Attack Rate After Smoke-Free Law.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: bars; bevperdue; busybodies; healthcare; heartattacks; nannystate; niconannies; niconazis; restaurants; secondhandsmoke; smokefree; smokingban; smokingnazis; study; tobacco; tobaccofree
“Informed by this strong evidence, we should now act to protect all workers in North Carolina, not just those working in restaurants and bars, from the hazards of second hand smoke.”

Does this mean that people who hire domestic workers won't be able to smoke in their own homes while the workers are on the premises?

1 posted on 11/16/2011 12:39:23 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Eric Blair 2084; SheLion; Gabz; Hank Kerchief; 383rr; libertarian27; ...

A joint government-university study that shows good results from a government policy? I’m shocked!

(In all fairness, it is backed up by other studies.)

Nanny State PING!


2 posted on 11/16/2011 12:44:25 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

That is because nobody is working and there is no stress setting at home collecting un-employment!


3 posted on 11/16/2011 12:47:06 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“Emergency room visits by North Carolinians experiencing heart attacks have declined by 21 percent since the January 2010 start of the state’s Smoke-Free Restaurants and Bars Law”
That means that smokers are staying home and eating better and drinking less.


4 posted on 11/16/2011 12:47:30 PM PST by running_dog_lackey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Oh yea?

Have the researchers checked the traffic fatality or incident rate way up since they pass the law?

Speaking of ‘cause and effect’, completely non-related, of course.


5 posted on 11/16/2011 12:49:56 PM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
CNN: Long hours at work may boost heart-attack risk

Higher unemployment means fewer hours worked. Fewer hours means fewer heart attacks. Unemployment saves lives!

6 posted on 11/16/2011 12:50:40 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: running_dog_lackey

Very scientific “modeling”, LOL:

Supporting data.
We collected county-level gender- and age-specific stimates of population from North Carolina’s Office of State Budget and Management. We extracted county-specific weekly average temperature data from the Southeast Regional Climate Center (http://www.sercc.com). For counties without a weather tation, average temperature was based on average weekly temperatures recorded in all counties that are adjacent to the county with the missing data. Data on weekly rates of ED visits for influenza like illness (ILI) were accessed from the NC DETECT system and defined using NC DETECT’s syndrome based reporting definition.

Statistical Analysis
We used an interrupted time series design to evaluate whether the implementation of smoke-free legislation on Jan. 1, 2010, was associated with a change in the rate of ED visits for AMI. We calculated crude and adjusted rate ratios
by modeling the weekly number of ED visits for...


7 posted on 11/16/2011 12:52:37 PM PST by donna (This is what happens when America is no longer a Christian nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: donna

I smell BS. Somebody please let the herd out.

TC


8 posted on 11/16/2011 12:56:09 PM PST by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The figures from the study actually suggest otherwise. The reduction from 2008 to 2009 was about 900 ER visits. In 2010 the reduction was around 500. It could be argued that the legislation slowed the reduction by about half.


9 posted on 11/16/2011 12:59:00 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
unfreaking beleivable. The law didn't take effect until 2010-01-01.

It was trending downward before the law went into effect. There was a bigger overal decrease from 08-09, than 09-10. and Women 18-59 from 09-10 ? geeze...

"Number of Emergency Department visits in North Carolina with a first-listed diagnosis for acute myocardial infarction for years 2008 to 2010, overall and by categories of age and gender."

Men................................ Women
Year All events 18-59 60 + 18-59 60+

2008 9,066 2,106 2,778 1,288 2,894
2009 8,113 1,962 2,630 1,093 2,428
2010 7,669 1,523 1,873 1,735 2,538

10 posted on 11/16/2011 1:06:03 PM PST by stylin19a (obama - "FREDO" smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click the Pic               Thank you, JoeProBono

Gary Takes the Pigeon's Advice and Hurries Back to Harriet by FedEx
He Absolutely Has to Get There Overnight!

Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!


Donate Monthly
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each New Monthly Donor

11 posted on 11/16/2011 1:23:49 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: running_dog_lackey

People who eat out more often have higher cholesteral.


12 posted on 11/16/2011 1:26:55 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


13 posted on 11/16/2011 1:30:10 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

As good old Dad used to say: “Horse Puckey.”


14 posted on 11/16/2011 1:37:30 PM PST by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Bullshit

/.02

15 posted on 11/16/2011 1:40:09 PM PST by tomkat (para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yeah its BS alright.. these govt funded “Studies” always manage to come out right after a ban is passed.. means nothing because the sole purpose of the “study” is to simply say “See we were right govt knows best”

Your best bet is to ignore these kind of silly fake studies.


16 posted on 11/16/2011 1:41:00 PM PST by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eXe

I hate these so-called studies. The results presume that all of these people that had MI’s were regular bar patrons that went to places that allowed smoking. And now these barflys are not having as many heart attacks. That is simply not provable or even credible. How do prove a negative? You can’t demostrate that these people wouldn’t have had a heart attack anyway.


17 posted on 11/16/2011 1:51:38 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There are lies, dammed lies, and statistics.

The correct question for the "reporter" to ask is how the incidence of heart attacks dropped in the previous 2 year period ('08-'10), and in the 2 year period prior to that.

I'd bet that it's not too different from the period measured (1/10 to current, I'm supposing, but the article conveniently left that out as well).

18 posted on 11/16/2011 2:04:53 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

NO NO NO NO

This is all bogus BS. All “studies” in regard to this have been proven to be doctored in one way or another.


19 posted on 11/16/2011 2:28:07 PM PST by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
It could be argued that the legislation slowed the reduction by about half.

You were probably able to do that analysis in just a couple minutes. I wish there were someone in the media or the legislature capable of pointing out the same. Unfortunately, most people will believe this baloney and it only invites the nannies to up their game.

20 posted on 11/16/2011 3:23:10 PM PST by BfloGuy (Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I used to debunk these type of studies on a point by point basis.

It's just too tiring anymore and it comes down to the same thing each time.

All I can say to this study right now is, "PPPPFFFFFFTTTTTT".

21 posted on 11/16/2011 3:23:57 PM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I’ve seen enough of these to be debunked, so I’m not buying.


22 posted on 11/16/2011 4:03:00 PM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson